The Infinite! In Search of The Ultimate Truth.

[Matthew Ellard]

No. You don't seem to have a basic 12 year old's education in science.

You can't explain the primary school experiment, why iron filings on paper, over a magnet actually shows electromagnetic waves.

Your "God is infinities" (bouncing photon balls) religion can't explain why two magnets have positive poles that repel, although that was known 200 years ago.

Your "God is infinities" (bouncing photon balls) religion can't explain why Polaroid glasses filter out electromagnetic waves at certain angles.

Your "God is infinities" (bouncing photon balls ) religion can't explain why RADAR waves bounce back from objects at a distance.

Your "God is infinities" (bouncing photon balls ) religion, with infinite particles and no gaps, can explain why black holes don't, expand and absorb the entire universe.

Your "God is infinities" (bouncing photon balls ) religion,can't explain how light travels through vacuums between stars.

Now that I know your education level. I can start explaining how electromagnetic waves work and show you the experiments that prove this.

In contrast, you can't show any experiment or any evidence for your hilarious "God is infinities" religion.

I have explained ALL that, REPEATEDLY! I find it boring going over and over and over the same thing.

No. You haven't addressed, not even one, of the experiments that prove light is an electromagnetic wave. Instead you posted more incoherent nonsense about your "God is infinities religion" .

I have said that "magnets" Polarized ferromagnetic metals, polarize in turn particles within the area called the "magnetic" field, which in turn polarizes materials entering that area of polarized particles called the "magnetic field."

So you just admitted there is an electromagnetic field, after denying that for 10 pages.

That was very funny.

Now that you finally admitted there is such a thing as a magnet and that magnets have electromagnetic fields, can you see any reason why two alternative electromagnetic fields maintain maintain an electromagnetic wave form?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

What does your theory explain? You cannot even tell me how light moves,

See above. That is a light wave. Didn't you know?

 

[tazanastazio]

See above. That is a light wave. Didn't you know?

No, that is what you understand as a wave, whereas it is particles interacting with particles giving you that IMPRESSION, just like the molecules of water in any of the oceans of your choice for the analogy.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

No, that is what you understand as a wave, whereas it is particles interacting with particles giving you that IMPRESSION

No. We already have thousands of experiments that prove that Maxwell's light wave is exactly that, as defined in the mathematics shown in the diagram.

We have the two slit experiment, Polaroid sunglasses and so on and so on. Maxwell's equations defined the speed of light almost two hundred years ago.

Your hilarious "God is infinities" claim that light is little bouncing balls is not supported by one experiment.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

I proved to you why photons do not increase to infinite mass .

That was hilarious. Electromagnetic waves only move at the speed of light and have no mass.

Are you saying you didn't even know light (electromagnetic waves) travels at the speed of light?

 

[tazanastazio]

No. We already have thousands of experiments that prove that Maxwell's light wave is exactly that, as defined in the mathematics shown in the diagram.

We have the two slit experiment, Polaroid sunglasses and so on and so on. Maxwell's equations defined the speed of light almost two hundred years ago.

Your hilarious "God is infinities" claim that light is little bouncing balls is not supported by one experiment.

"In the mid 1800s, Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell established that light is a form of electromagnetic energy that travels in waves. The question of how it manages to do so in the absence of a medium is explained by the nature of electromagnetic waves....."
https://sciencing.com/light-travel-4570255.html

Your worldly knowledge is 200 years behind current science.

Perhaps is the other way around, if that is the case our lives will not be enough "time" to wait and see.

 

[abaddon]

This is not correct. We know light travels and we know the speed of light. Laser range finders would not work if light didn't travel. Light leaves a range finder, bounces of what you point it at and returns. The time that takes tells you how far the object is away. You can test this yourself. Laser range finders are for sale in most sporting goods stores that sell hunting or golf supplies (though I consider the use of such things in golf as cheating) for under $100. You can test this yourself.

Uhh, yeah. How does tanastazio not know this? Seems to me to me a trivially easy thing to demonstrate. Once upon a long ago, realtors measured your rooms with tapes, geosurveyors measured your neighbourhood with tapes.

These days, it is all laser measurement which, according to tanastazio is not possible. Odd then that it reliably works, no?

In fact, it is so de riguer that there are teleshopping ads on TV for DIY gadgets that do exactly that which anyone can buy for a few of whatever currency. None of those can possibly work either according to him.

Not to mention GPS.

Tanastazio has apparently painted himself into a corner. According to his notion, none of these things can possibly work. But they demonstrably do. Thus tanastazio's idea has no evidence for it and ignores all evidence that it is flat out wrong. The only descriptor I can come u with for the risible idea does not pass the MA.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Tanastazio has apparently painted himself into a corner.

Tananastazio is hilarious. His "explanations" keep contradicting his own claims.

In one post he believes in relativity (particles with mass obtain infinite mass at the speed of light) while simultaneously claiming photons are little particles balls knocking into each other at the speed of light with no mass increase)

I proved to you why photons do not increase to infinite mass (as per relativity)

He still won't admit Polaroid glasses are real.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Perhaps is the other way around,

No. The last two hundred years of experiments proving light is an electromagnetic wave will not change by "magic".

 

[tazanastazio]

Uhh, yeah. How does tanastazio not know this? Seems to me to me a trivially easy thing to demonstrate. Once upon a long ago, realtors measured your rooms with tapes, geosurveyors measured your neighbourhood with tapes.

These days, it is all laser measurement which, according to tanastazio is not possible. Odd then that it reliably works, no?

In fact, it is so de riguer that there are teleshopping ads on TV for DIY gadgets that do exactly that which anyone can buy for a few of whatever currency. None of those can possibly work either according to him.

Not to mention GPS.

Tanastazio has apparently painted himself into a corner. According to his notion, none of these things can possibly work. But they demonstrably do. Thus tanastazio's idea has no evidence for it and ignores all evidence that it is flat out wrong. The only descriptor I can come u with for the risible idea does not pass the MA.

Every phenomenon is a result of particle to particle interaction (action and reaction). Particles interact by pushing/pulling, bonding/dis-bonding and energizing one another. In a "magnetic field" smaller particles within particles, pull smaller particles within other particles (polarization), each smaller particle therefore contributing to the generation of the magnetic field, a magnet is generating as a whole. That is how a magnetic field is comprised. With the energizing of particles (fire) we have heat and light. The energy increase causes electron jumps causing the release of photons/particles of energy, causing further energy increase and escaping from the particles in the areas surrounding the previous particles in a ripple/wave effect. Pushing particles in a vibrating manner, pushes in turn other particles which cause our ear drums to vibrate and our brains to interpret the effect as "sound." The chain reaction of particles we understand as waves; light,sound, heat, waves in water; or as a magnetic or a gravitational field.

The measurement with the help of lasers happens simply because a laser beam - (particles interacting in what we understand as parallel wave motions which has the same frequency/amplitude and wave length with each other) - interacts with/energizes particles of an object, which particles interact with/energize particles back all the way to the sensor of the meter. The meter displays the distance, based on the time it took for this particle interaction.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Every phenomenon is a result of particle to particle interaction

Sooooo....... random isotope radiation (half life), is little balls hitting other little balls?

What experiment are you claiming as evidence for this insane claim? A billiard table?

 

[Matthew Ellard]

particles interacting in what we understand as parallel wave motions

Are you serious?

How can an isolated particle have wave frequency?

You really don't know what any of these words mean do you?

 

[abaddon]

Tananastazio is hilarious. His "explanations" keep contradicting his own claims.

We can all observe this. We know that the rules of this site mean he cannot expunge his stuff.

Everyone knows this. Except him for reasons I cannot fathom.

I suspect that now that he has discovered that there is no revisions allowed he will likely bail.

 

[tazanastazio]

Tananastazio is hilarious. His "explanations" keep contradicting his own claims.

In one post he believes in relativity (particles with mass obtain infinite mass at the speed of light) while simultaneously claiming photons are little particles balls knocking into each other at the speed of light with no mass increase)



He still won't admit Polaroid glasses are real.

No you got it wrong; I simply said "if" relativity was correct, and object which traveled with the speed of light increased to infinite mass, my theory of photons, which do not actually travel but cause a ripple/wave effect instead, explains why they don't acquire infinite mass, as they would if relativity was correct in this particular position; namely the increasing to infinite mass of objects that travel with the speed of light. I believe that any object would not be able to withstand the friction it would have to sustain by travelling beyond certain speed.

I have a pair of MJim's, they work really good (so do a $30 version of polaroid glasses that I use when jogging, not as good though truth be told). Polaroid glasses work by adjusting the angle of the particle to particle ripple/wave effect; you tried to make that point before. Lenses in telescopes function by adjusting angle of ripple/wave particle to particle energizing as well (as I have already mentioned earlier).

 

[Matthew Ellard]

Everyone knows this. Except him for reasons I cannot fathom.

Tananastazio originally was claiming his little balls bounce off little balls, as proof of god, on another forum. When he got destroyed he came back and tried to make it sound like science by using science words he doesn't understand. He got destroyed again so he started posting here.

He didn't know what a magnet was until yesterday.

 

[Matthew Ellard]

I simply said "if" relativity was correct,

What does the mass of particles do, when accelerated to almost the speed of light, in the Large Hadron Collider, according to the law of relativity?

You really don't know anything about basic science do you?

The LHC
https://home.cern/science/accelerators/large-hadron-collider

 

[Matthew Ellard]

my theory of photons, which do not actually travel but cause a ripple/wave effect instead,

You claim photons are individual little balls. Tell us how all the little photon balls are connected to maintain a homogeneous wave frequency in the two slit wave experiment?

Rubber bands?

 

[tazanastazio]

You claim photons are individual little balls. Tell us how all the little photon balls are connected to maintain a homogeneous wave frequency in the two slit wave experiment?

Rubber bands?

Isn't this exactly the reason you CANNOT EXPLAIN how light moves? Or how the photons move in waves? Or their dual particle wave nature as it is shown by the double slit experiment? Isn't that I have been saying all along (with my whip and water hose wave example) that you cannot have a wave because photons are not connected? This is precisely why my theory works, and yours doesn't.

 

[tazanastazio]

Sooooo....... random isotope radiation (half life), is little balls hitting other little balls?

What experiment are you claiming as evidence for this insane claim? A billiard table?

Within an atom there are subatomic particles. When the atoms break apart the smaller particles are released and they interact with other particles to an infinitesimally small size which we understand as "energy." What evidence do you have to prove otherwise?

 

[tazanastazio]

What does the mass of particles do, when accelerated to almost the speed of light, in the Large Hadron Collider, according to the law of relativity?

You really don't know anything about basic science do you?

The LHC
https://home.cern/science/accelerators/large-hadron-collider

The electrons LOSE ENERGY (break apart to infinitesimally smaller particles which in turn interact with other infinitesimally smaller particles in the "vacuum." in a wave motion, the frequency,amplitude and "wave" length of which, we call X-rays. They do not increase to infinite mass. Now try this in space with a spaceship, see what happens to it.