LilaMae
Scholar
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 106
My point had more to do with TAM than with DragonCon, in case that wasn't clear. I did not attend DCon and don't plan to. Nothing against it.. it's just not my thing, that's all.
Bottom line IMO: TAM should be the Amazing Meeting, not the Amazing Convention. I think that is in keeping with the spirit of what TAM was intended to be. And it's nonsense to think limiting attendance will stymie the progress of the skeptical movement.
If you're concerned about the growth of the skeptical movement, why not ask yourself how you are helping. Are you actively involved in your local community of skeptics/critical thinking groups? Or is it possible you really don't do much more than sit on your ass in front of your computer commenting and complaining on skeptical blogs and forums?
Bottom line IMO: TAM should be the Amazing Meeting, not the Amazing Convention. I think that is in keeping with the spirit of what TAM was intended to be. And it's nonsense to think limiting attendance will stymie the progress of the skeptical movement.
If you're concerned about the growth of the skeptical movement, why not ask yourself how you are helping. Are you actively involved in your local community of skeptics/critical thinking groups? Or is it possible you really don't do much more than sit on your ass in front of your computer commenting and complaining on skeptical blogs and forums?