Suzanne Somers strikes again

Still that is kind of risky. I do know that some Naturopathic drugs and supplements screw around with real drugs like chemotherapy. I think I remember reading about it on this forum.

It could be, I didn't know she's gone this route as she'd worked for evidence based medicine for years ( receptionist in a doctors office ) and I was used to some of her old school funny ideas, like putting a chicken in the oven, then setting the timer on the oven to start cooking it in, like six hours.

There was no talking to mom and she didn't want a computer or internet access so she could look for herself re possible treatment conflicts. I wish I'd paid more attention to what she was reading and given that she was a big fan of Three's Company when it was on, I could see her "trusting" sources like Sommers.
 
From the linked aticle:
Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez. He’s the second featured doctor who is “curing cancer,” right there in Somers’ book in Chapter 6!

That’s right, one of these doctors who are “curing cancer” is a quack (in my opinion, of course) whose “protocol,” which includes 150 supplement pills a day topped off by a couple of coffee enemas per day, was recently shown to be worse than useless for pancreatic cancer and, indeed, based on a recent study, far worse than conventional treatment.


I can't believe the lady is allowed to advocate 'coffee enemas'.
See the aticle and the links as to why.
 
Science based medicine has a fantastic post about Somers' book Knockout and the inaccuracies just in chapter 1. Scary stuff.

Apparently Gonzalez and the coffee 'treatment' not only receives a mention in chapter 6, but it's dedicated to him:
The Doctors Who Are Curing Cancer
Chapter 5: Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D.
Chapter 6: Nicholas Gonzalez, M.D.
Chapter 7: Burton Goldberg
Chapter 8: Julie Taguchi, M.D.
Chapter 9: James Forsythe, M.D.
 
Last edited:
Comment from Suzzane's blog said:
In your speaking engagements, you MUST talk about the hospital you were at and the doctor's you saw, etc. The story in your book is too vague. You are losing credibilty fast. People are talking and some are even saying that the whole hospital story might be made up. People are wondering why they never heard about you being rushed to the hospital like we usually do when something happens to any celebrity and how 6 doctors could get a diagnosis wrong and why you will not name the hospital or doctors. I am a big fan of yours and purchased your new book as soon as it was released. Please set the record straight. Thanks for getting all of this great information out in the open. I have seen too many people ravaged by chemo. Thanks!!
What the hell? I'm almost beginning to wonder if the skeptical side is infiltrating the comments and acting like agent provocateurs. I really hope she is every bit of stupid that her book makes her out to be because she would get ripped apart by that hospital.
 
Last edited:
You live in Canada eh....

Little profit in managed care for the drug companies or doctors in the US.



My son is type one.

I am type two, and I live in the US. My [perfectly ordinary, non-"alternative"] doctor recommended diet and exercise. It worked. I lost 40 lbs and no longer have the symptoms of type II diabetes. Diet and exercise for type II is by no means an "alternative" treatment.


As the joke goes:

Q: What do you call alternative medicine that's repeatedly been proven to work in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials?

A: Medicine.
 
Somewhat off-topic, but regarding diabetes, the wiki article is of interest.

From the description of type II:

Type 2 diabetes is usually first treated by increasing physical activity, and eliminating saturated fat and reducing sugar and carbohydrate intake with a goal of losing weight.

So according to this, diet and exercise seems to be the standard treatment. Furthermore, this treatment is by no means new:

Sushruta (6th century BCE) identified diabetes and classified it as Medhumeha.[94] He further identified it with obesity and sedentary lifestyle, advising exercises to help "cure" it.
 
My doctor handed me a free 100 packet starter kit for the sinus rinse (Neilmed) which I use every evening before bed, and it did indeed reduce my sinusitis dramatically.

Let me repeat:

My doctor handed me a free 100 packet starter kit.

He did not charge me for it.
Of course, he did that because he's madly in love with you ... :cool:

DR
 
I HAVE to quote this part of Dr. Gorski's review of Sommers' book linked earlier in this thread:

It’s incredibly hard at this point not to go even beyond Mark Crislip-grade acid sarcasm at the arrogance of ignorance on display. Here we have a woman who is apparently taking cortisol as part of her “bioidentical hormone” cocktail, and this woman does not know that each and every one of those estrogens she is taking is a steroid hormone. More importantly, Somers apparently does not know that cortisol is a corticosteroid (”cortico,” get it?), the very same kind of steroid that is routinely used by us evil reductionist practitioners of “Western medicine” as an anti-inflammatory and immunsuppressant. When used that way by us evil pharma shills, cortisol is known as hydrocortisone, which is–gasp!–a pharmaceutical concoction! It’s also “bioidentical,” too, proving once more that “bioidentical” does not mean “risk-free.” Indeed, hydrocortisone is often included as one of the drugs in immunusuppressive protocols used to prevent the rejection of organ transplants. Given that Somers has said that she takes enough “bioidentical” estrogens to recreate the hormonal milieu of a woman in her 20s (in other words, far more estrogens than a 63 year old woman would ever have or need), it’s not beyond the pale to wonder whether she similarly takes a significant dose of hydrocortisone (sorry, cortisol) as part of her brew of “bioidenticals,” particularly in light of her having fallen seriously ill due to an organism that usually causes mild disease in immunocompetent hosts. Yes, valley fever can sometimes be a bad disease in immunocompetent hosts, but being immunocompromised for whatever reason is still a significant risk factor for disseminated disease or the reactivation of quiescent disease.
After reading Somers’ story in Chapter 1, I shook my head in disbelief that Random House apparently didn’t have better editors who could have told Somers that she had just written something incredibly contradictory and just plain dumb when she wrote that didn’t take steroids in the context of writing how she castigated her oncologist for “not understanding” the role of cortisol in her menopause treatments.

LOL!!!! Priceless awesome. I will never read a word of her drivel, even skipping over her crap quoted by Dr. Gorski, but I'm happy I didn't miss this review!

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/?p=2244
 
After reading Somers’ story in Chapter 1, I shook my head in disbelief that Random House apparently didn’t have better editors who could have told Somers that she had just written something incredibly contradictory and just plain dumb when she wrote that didn’t take steroids in the context of writing how she castigated her oncologist for “not understanding” the role of cortisol in her menopause treatments.
I shake my head in disbelief that he or anyone would think any publisher cares. It's all about the almighty dollar. Somers could recommend rhino horn powder as a cancer cure-all and if it looked like it'd be a good seller, publishers will publish it (with the appropriate CYA disclaimers of course).
 
Well yeah. Thing is, most people won't get how completely stupid she is. She caused this disease that she got and ranted about in Chapter 1. She doesn't know a damn thing about the crap she stuffs in her own body that will (hopefully before anyone rushes her to hospital again) hasten her death by breaking down her immune system.

I wish they had let her think she had cancer again and left her untreated, but somebody might have figured that out and sued the hospital. Dammmmmmmmit.
 
Thanks for posting up that review, eon of ages.
It's good to know someone's showing up the lady's incoherence.
How did that chapter get past the publishers' lawyers?
 
She should be sued out of existence. :mgbanghead

Ignorant ditz.

Chemo IS poison....targetted poison.

I'm still suffering the side effects of that poison but I have no cancer.

I'll get over the side effects.....I wouldn't have lived 2 years without the "poison".

I have an 80% chance of an outright cure....and the radiation was a just in case.

Hey, that's great, good for you!
My mum was diagnosed with 4th stage colon cancer a few years back--lucky for her and us, there were poisonous TOXINS on hand that kept her cancer in check and kept her alive for two years. I mean, yeah the evil Big Pharma controlled surgeon did SLASH her open to get at the primary tumor, but it was the poisonous chemo that kept the tumors in her liver and lungs at bay for over two years. Yay poison! Yay Big Pharma!
 
Thanks for posting up that review, eon of ages.
It's good to know someone's showing up the lady's incoherence.
How did that chapter get past the publishers' lawyers?
I think there was something about a disclaimer... would have to read the article again or get a review copy of the stupid book. I won't be buying that crappy waste of ink myself though.
 

Back
Top Bottom