• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rob Menard's FOTL Claims II

Heres an example of Menardian humour.
http://www.angelfire.com/rebellion/elizabeth/
This was in the letter that he sent to the authorities when they took Elizabeth
I have been doing some research on the effects of fathers on families and the importance of fathers to developing children. I feel your Ministry either knows or should know these following statistics. If you do not know these statistics, you are negligent in your duties. If you do, then you disregarded them and are therefore fully responsible and liable if any of these things befall Elizabeth:

Daughters of single parents are:

53% more likely to marry as teenagers,
111% more likely to have children as teenagers,
164% more likely to be a single parent
92% more likely to divorce if they even marry.

Children from Fatherless households are:

5 times more likely to commit suicide.
32 times more likely to run away.
20 times more likely to have behavioral disorders.
14 times more likely to commit rape: This applies to boys of course.
9 times more likely to drop out of high school.
10 times more likely to abuse chemical substances.
9 times more likely to end up in a state-operated institution.
20 times more likely to end up in prison.

That tasteless quip would have been enough for me to deny him any access.

Oh and heres another statistic
Children who have a drunken pothead lounging around sponging of his/her mother are 100% more likely to grow up maladjusted.
 
Last edited:
When has Menard ever given anybody the straight skinny on anything?

When have any of his stories done anything but cast him in the best light possible?

Despite Menard assigning evil deeds to government social workers one can hardly imagine child protective services workers putting the kybosh on a stable, supportive relationship between Megan and Bobby that promoted little Lizzy Anne’s growth and development.

You will note that Bobby boy really never talks about the conditions in his “home” or recounts Megan imploring officials to let her and the baby stay with him. But, in a pathetically self-revealing diatribe the ole boy warns against letting authorities come to your home and talk to the child’s mother.

Duh?

Menard never talks about presenting Megan and her parents with a pay stub, an apartment lease, a modest savings account. . .and a ring!

No, according to our subject after the removal of his “daughter” he says he read Black’s Law and Bouviers for three days and, like a budget version of Muhammad in the cave, received enlightenment!

He started publishing his revelation over the internet and it turns out, like all narcissists, he liked the attention he got from baby daddies who weren’t allowed in the same block has their children.

For the first time in his life Bobby had found a subculture he could get over on with his stories!

Maybe his daddy was wrong?

He bought a second hand fez, started borrowing bad ideas from failed detaxers and sovs. . .and the rest is history.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of GODOF, can we take down Ceylon next? He irks me. Yeah, I said "irks".

What, you mean Ceylon of "this will definitely work, but before you try it you should pay for all of my letters but then do all your own research and if it doesn't work its not my fault" fame?

He irks me too. He so should be next on the list.
 
Rob Menard is on GetOutOfDebtFree!!!!

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=45259

I don't recall him being on GOODF before. Is this a new low, even for him...?

Thanks for the link!

The show will eventually be on the archives at: http://www.bobsbackyard.co.uk/darkcity/live.html

-----------------

Dope Clock update: It is day 79 since Fez Boy filed his magic freeman court papers and I haven’t heard anything from the courts, or my internet and email providers.
 
Your case will make a federal law precinct that others will be able to rely on to smash every one of these fraudster and that includes the bank.
Translation: This has never worked before, so a win would set a precedent. Please risk everything as we watch from the safety of the internet.

The thread is essentially a full confession to defraud the company. She blocked out the 'personal info', but not the date of the letter or the contact.

Dear Mr. Bulen,
I am an observer to one of the Internet scam belief systems being posted on getoutofdebtfree.org as a valid way to escape debt.

If you visit http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=141&t=39407 and view the attached scanned letter on that site, you should be able to determine the name and account of the person in question. The thread should give you full insight to their knowledge of the debt, intent to not re-pay, and strange belief that they think they are somehow entitled.

I do not have any interest in either party, but would find it entertaining to see them report back to their forum that everything they have said was to be used against them in court.
 
Thanks for the link!

The show will eventually be on the archives at: http://www.bobsbackyard.co.uk/darkcity/live.html

The "show" is availble now.

Listen and hear Menard claim that Constitutions, empowered by the will of the people, are mere “delusions“ while claiming that his notions of direct democracy and C3PO vigilante justice are real!

Yes, you heard it right!

In an astounding self-contradiction Menard ignores his own claim that democratic governments can’t rule without the contractual consent of the individual by proposing direct democracy via internet!

But at least he didn’t sound stoned or drunk.
 
I want to nominate this for a stundie, but I really don't know which part to quote...

Those intellectuals at GOODF have worked out that the only reason Black's Law Dictionary was updated was because the PTB realised that the FOTlers had worked out the real meaning of the legal words, so they had to make up new ones.

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=45319

this is just a general question about the use of Blacks Law Books

When there are quotes or definitions given for certain words that are to be used- why is it not taken from the LATEST Editon
of Blacks Law.

eg:
Notice that I made a big mistake using the word inalienable instead of UN-A-LIEN-ABLE, always use the latter starting with "un" for unalienable rights are incapable of being alienated, that is they can't be sold, or transferred look it up in the Black's Law Dictionary 6th edition.

Does this word not appear in the latest edition

I always see references made to Edition 1 or the third Edition- Surely the latest Edition should have what we are looking for

Any opinion on this anyone

And the answer given:

you will find the better terms in the older books before they started to realise we were reading it

UN-A-LIEN-ABLE indeed.
 
Isn't it obvious that tptb, being all-powerful alien shapeshifting Jewish-Muslim lizard-men bankers from the future, realised what was going to be going on and started changing the odd word and definition here and there after 1933 as a display of their awesome power over mankind.
 
Speaking of GODOF, can we take down Ceylon next? He irks me. Yeah, I said "irks".
The thing with ceylon is he will never stray from his own forum, I know hes an idiot but unlike Menard he seems to have his ego in check and doesnt feel the need to go elsewhere promoting his garbage.
He posts Youtube videos but censors any negative responses.
Unless someone set up a sockpuppet on GOODF and made friends with him and got him to commit to breaking the law by selling duff legal advice then hes pretty much safe..

mmm...now theres a thought ;)
 
And although Dean is not charged with having certain political beliefs, it does appear he was targeted for them,
Well yes. If your political beliefs include a way of life where you think you are not subject to laws, then of course you're "targeted". Their job is to target people who are breaking laws.
 
Ceylon's real name seems to be a mystery. This, like the man himself, irks me. Yeah, I said "irks" again.

Jon Witterick, on the other hand, was totally the bullied kid in your class with the ankle-swinging trousers.
 
Brilliantly passive aggressive post on Robs 'fan' facebook account:

https://www.facebook.com/RobertArthurMenard/posts/417714794980741
I'm not sure that he says POLITICAL BELIEFS quite enough! How many times does he need to repeat it before it becomes a compelling argument? Or even a representation of reality?

Although it is coming from the "Interim" "Chief" of the "Peace" of the "Canadian Common Corps of ""Peace Officers"" so there is that.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom