• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Rich Man's Trick

ozeco41 said:
My position unchanged for years. I think that there are many aspects of the socio political situation that have not been adequately addressed.

AND one big factor - possibly the biggest - is that the truth movement had been its own worst enemy.

Pursuing silly claims for CD. The AE911 strategy the most obvious and a dead set recipe for a political loss. "This looks like CD THEREFORE we demand a New Investigation". Anyone trying a political influence move would be well advised to NEVER feed the politicians with an easy way out. Especially when the issue will not be popular.

There never has been the slightest case for CD claims and most politicians being pressured for a new investigation are bound to look at the supporting argument, seek reasonable advice, identify the nonsense of CD and drop the issue.

Then you resort to false generalisations which are a common procedural fault in truther claims. You say "is almost as good as understanding that the official story is bogus." and you put that nonsense on par with "understanding that the event was exploited". Give us a break. At the least drop the false global claim to make it appear that you are partially rational "[some/many/a lot/a few] of the findings of the official story are wrong."

The instant you resort to global or exclusive claims (most/many/lots of ;) ) intelligent readers will switch off.

And you do yourself further disservice by quoting me THEN making this false GLOBAL assertion with the inference that it includes me: I have not relied on official stories or official reasoning since my second week on the Internet - late Nov. 2007. Many do - I don't and it is a deliberate long term choice.

No comment needed on the remaining two issues:
Click to expand...


You mentally cropped the second paragraph which stated that while there can be a bit of "you're not consciously covering up mass murder", your denial of evidence while obsessing for years about "debunking" 9/11 doesn't leave you anywhere near someone to "negotiate" with. You are at fault, and it is the fact that you can't handle the truth that brought you here.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
It hasn't been penetrated significantly and the videos you refuse to understand are witness of that fact. Given the evidence it almost behaved like a mountain - just without reflecting the mass of a large passenger plane -, contrary to the comic-like understanding of physics you are willing to believe.
Click to expand...
Thanks for posting this, you saved me 3.5 hours watching the video (not that I have that time to waste.
 
JSanderO said:
A jet engine traveling at 500 mph will severe a steel column as in the towers like a knife through butter.. as will a tank of fuel, landing gear and so forth.
Click to expand...

No, that is fundamentally wrong.

Very unlike a knife thru butter.

A knife will slice thru a stick of butter ... with NO DAMAGE done to the knife.

The jet, the jet engine, the tank of fuel, the landing gear, etc. WILL (& did) go thru those columns. But all of them suffered massive amounts of damage in the process.
 
slowsmile said:
121 views in 3 1/2 years - you can't even attract the "low hanging fruit" on the David Icke Forum.
Click to expand...


I didn't do any promoting other than here. As I stated earlier it isn't important to me as it has turned out that this issue isn't one that can bring about change. As long as you work for the greater good in light of obvious ridiculousness of state of affairs, I'm fine with that, regardless of your lack of critical thinking re:9/11. Choose your battlefield.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
I didn't do any promoting other than here. As I stated earlier it isn't important to me as it has turned out that this issue isn't one that can bring about change. As long as you work for the greater good in light of obvious ridiculousness of state of affairs, I'm fine with that, regardless of your lack of criitcal thinking re:9/11. Choose your battlefield.
Click to expand...

People on here can count to twenty without taking their socks off. You need a dumber audience that can't tell the difference between hitting a building and hitting a mountain.

The DIF seems tailor made for you - it'd boost your youtube post count no end.
 
tfk said:
No, that is fundamentally wrong.

Very unlike a knife thru butter.

A knife will slice thru a stick of butter ... with NO DAMAGE done to the knife.

The jet, the jet engine, the tank of fuel, the landing gear, etc. WILL (& did) go thru those columns. But all of them suffered massive amounts of damage in the process.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected and I didn't mean literally... I meant they wouldn't bounce off... and not sever the steel.
 
slowsmile said:
People on here can count to twenty without taking their socks off. You need a dumber audience that can't tell the difference between hitting a building and hitting a mountain.

The DIF seems tailor made for you - it'd boost your youtube post count no end.
Click to expand...


You're wasting our time.
 
Childlike Empress said:
"It" didn't. You can see the collapse of the outer facade in my playlist. If an airliner would have been able to penetrate that deeply, rocket scientists wouldn't be needed. Ask Mackey. Oops, he left like all of your "experts".
Click to expand...
I watched your play list. Could you describe the construction of the first 3 layers at the point of impact? I know, so don't try to "educate" me.
 
DGM said:
I am. Was it more than one? Three puts in the court yard.
Click to expand...


You failed to point out the remains of the large jetliner you maintain penetrated the Pentagon in the videos you want us to believe you watched with an open eye.

I feel insulted by your expressed chutzpah, bro.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom