• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Regarding Franko...

It is really pathetic that the biggest troll on the forum (De_Bunk), calls for the banning of Franko (one of the smartest guys on the forum).

Every post De_Bunk makes is an appeal to popularity logic fallacy, incomplete sentences and void completely of paragraphs of any substance.

De_Bunk couldn't out-debate a gerbil.

JK
 
Nobody gets banned for their ideas, period.

I would ask all to try, ever so hard, to be a tad more civil. Again, I can't force you to be, but can we drop the level of vitral a tad?

I think we have really done all we can in the 'banging our heads against the wall' area. So if we could, say, adopt the model of the House of Commons, things would be nicer :).

There, if you want to insult someone, you must be clever about it. For example, "you are an idiot" would not be allowed, but "bidlack's a fine intellect, when measured by counting the number of brain cells alone" or "Bidlack is the model of decorum, assuming one uses the model crafted by the visigoths" would be just peachy.

let's play nice, be witting, and let's see if we can't just get along? :)

Finally, when we start new threads, shall we strive to keep them from being focused singularly on the posts and comments of a single member? Again, I'm asking, as I can not direct in this area.

Can you tell I'm a stuffy old prude? :p

humbly but in hope,
 
UpTroll,

Very true. This thread started not to discusso free will, but about what should be done about Franko. Personally, I believe he represents everything being a skeptic is not.

How so, because I won’t believe in “free will” based on nothing more than your say so? Or is it because I am NOT a “smart” A-Theist like yourself? Are only A-Theists “skeptics” according to you UpTroll?

You claim that there is no evidence for God. This is patently false. How does making obviously false claims make YOU a Skeptic?

You are a non-skeptical Troll UpChimp. You are no different that that idiot De-Bungler, just nobody knows you or cares who you are other than you follow me around on this forum incessantly whining because I won’t believe your claims based on heresy.

He is closed minded, unthinking, unyielding in the face of evidence, and illogical in his argument.

Evidence? What evidence? I keep asking you for EVIDENCE OVER AND OVER again YOU NEVER present any.

So where is your Evidence UpTroll … lets see it. Start with “free will” what is Your evidence for “free will”?

What is your evidence that there is No God?

I appriciate an opposing point of view and love a good discussion …

That is obviously a lie.

.. but that is not what Franko offers.

I’ll debate you on anything. The problem is you offer no evidence. You are simply a fanatical religious nitwit who expects people to take your word for everything you say. But you NEVER support your claims.

Where is your evidence for “free will”? Why do you believe you have it?

Why do you believe that people will be moral without the notions of rewards and punishment?

What is your evidence that there is no god?

What is the difference between “random” and “magic” (I contend there is none).

What is your evidence that Matter makes consciousness?

How do you know that Solipsism isn’t True?

What makes you believe that “matter” even exist? How do you account for Einstein and Energy?

If Human action is NOT algorithmic, then how are YOU claiming it works?

How can you call yourself a Skeptic when you refuse to answer any questions about your beliefs?

One can only guess at his motives …

Your motives are easy to guess. You liked being an A-Theist with a “superior” metaphysical belief system. You liked coming here and talking trash to people who you knew you were “better“ and “smarter” than (Theist and deist). Come to find out you aren’t as smart as you thought, and you want to pretend that it is My fault.

… but they are not to have civil discussions with those who differ from him.

I have civil discussion with people who want to be civil. Unfortunately that doesn’t include you or the other hard-core fanatical A-Theists attempting to take over this Skeptic’s site for your own selfish and evil purposes. You have no desire for “discussion” UpTroll, and everyone here knows it. You are a devoted fanatical religious Troll here to spout off about how much better you are then the 90%+ of the general population stupid enough to believe what the evidence clearly indicates.

While temporary suspension would be welcome, Franko represents the first case where I feel banning is called for. Should the occasion ever arise where a vote is called for, I'm voting him off the island.

Begone A-Theist Troll! If anyone needs to be BANNED from this site it is You and the rest of your fanatical little cult. Besides … Your master De-Bungler is probably lonely without your constant adoration and praise …


I suggest you try this site. (www.infidels.org )You won’t find anyone questioning your precious religion there. JREF is not for YOU. It is a site for SKEPTICS – NOT Losers with a chip on their shoulder and a superiority complex from the cult of A-Theism.
 
(to Upchurch from Frannie)
Franko said:


I’ll debate you on anything.

Really? By "debate" do you mean discussion where both people can have a reasonable expectation to ask questions - and have those questions answered?

If so - count me in. I'd like to discuss fatalism, shall I start a new thread?

(if fatalism has been redefined in The Lexicon, please mention that before hand)

-Ed
 
Really? By "debate" do you mean discussion where both people can have a reasonable expectation to ask questions - and have those questions answered?

If so - count me in. I'd like to discuss fatalism, shall I start a new thread?

Sure Mossman, I am assuming you know nothig of Fate, because your prophecies NEVER seem to come TRUE.

So obviously you believe in "free will" -- I don't.

Why should I believe that You or I have "free will"?

What evidence do you have that would convince me to believe what you believe?
 
BTW ... I know that some people tried to email me today.

I have cleared out my old mail (again).

Please resend the emails.

Sorry for the inconvenience.
 
Franko said:

So obviously you believe in "free will" -- I don't.

Why should I believe that You or I have "free will"?

What evidence do you have that would convince me to believe what you believe?

Okay, but before I start the fatalism thread:

1) Repeat after me: "Mussy does not believe in free-will the way I have defined it." I have been very clear about this, were Franko to ask, "Mussy, do you believe in free-will?" Mossy would answer, "No." (unfortunately, Franko hasn't asked but we're being hypothetical)

2) Does The LD Lexicon have an entry under "Fatalism" - or do you use the standard philosophical definition? For reference, something like:

link
Belief that every event is bound to happen as it does no matter what we do about it. Fatalism is the most extreme form of causal determinism, since it denies that human actions have any causal efficacy. Any determinist holds that indigestion is the direct consequence of natural causes, but the fatalist believes that it is bound occur whether or not I eat spicy foods.

That's it - then we can have a nice pleasant discussion about fatalism.

-Ed
 
Mussy,

Okay, but before I start the fatalism thread:

Ohhh, there is no need to start a new thread. We can post right here.

1) Repeat after me: "Mussy does not believe in free-will the way I have defined it." I have been very clear about this, were Franko to ask, "Mussy, do you believe in free-will?" Mossy would answer, "No." (unfortunately, Franko hasn't asked but we're being hypothetical)

So you don’t believe in “free will” now Mussy?

Very good, I can see that I am having some effect on your Fate. I don’t know if that is a good thing or not from your POV.

Okay so you are conceding to the FACT that you are totally and completely controlled by TLOP – correct?

TLOP controls/makes YOU controls/makes CAR

Are you also claiming to be more or less conscious then your CAR?

How about TLOP?

Explain your reasoning.

2) Does The LD Lexicon have an entry under "Fatalism" - or do you use the standard philosophical definition? For reference, something like:

I just gave my definition of Fatalism in here the other day. I will try and find it and repost it here.

Essentially there are a few differences between Fatalism and determinism. In a way it is accurate to say that Fatalism is a “hard-core” form of Determinism. I would say that the main semantic difference between the two terms is that Fatalism implies the ability to predict the predetermined events in advance, whereas Determinism does not necessarily imply this. That is the main difference in my mind.
 
Franko said:
Mussy,

So you don’t believe in “free will” now Mussy?
Never did, Frannie. Had you stopped telling me I did long enough to read the numerous times I explicitely stated, "I do not believe in your free will" (word for word quote, by the way), then you would already know this.

Very good, I can see that I am having some effect on your Fate. I don’t know if that is a good thing or not from your POV.
(italics mine)Interesting statement, we'll get to that later.

Okay so you are conceding to the FACT that you are totally and completely controlled by TLOP – correct?
Effectively yes - I do believe there is wiggle room, but for the purposes of a discussion on fatalism, I'm willing to set that aside for now.


Are you also claiming to be more or less conscious then your CAR?
Always did claim to be more.

How about TLOP?
What about it?

Explain your reasoning.
For what, for not believing in your free-will? Let's use your example: I can't fly.

I just gave my definition of Fatalism in here the other day. I will try and find it and repost it here.

Essentially there are a few differences between Fatalism and determinism. In a way it is accurate to say that Fatalism is a “hard-core” form of Determinism. I would say that the main semantic difference between the two terms is that Fatalism implies the ability to predict the predetermined events in advance, whereas Determinism does not necessarily imply this. That is the main difference in my mind.

I think that meshes with my understanding of fatalism (minus the prediction part). For example, if I am sick and have a serious illness, yet am fated to get better, it doesn't matter whether or not I go to the hospital. (does that match what you're saying?)

How does the prediction element come in?

-Ed
 
Mussy,

[Do you still believe in “free willy A-Theist?] Never did, Frannie. Had you stopped telling me I did long enough to read the numerous times I explicitely stated, "I do not believe in your free will" (word for word quote, by the way), then you would already know this.

That’s not what you have said, and there are plenty of people here who know it Mussy.

But that is okay, I have been kicking your ass around for a good while, and now you quietly want to concede defeat on this point. Okay … I’ll let it go. So now you are an A-Theist Determinist – is that correct?

You believe that all of your actions are controlled by TLOP and have been preordained since the moment of the “Big Bang” – is this correct?
Franko:
Okay so you are conceding to the FACT that you are totally and completely controlled by TLOP – correct?

Mussy:
Effectively yes - I do believe there is wiggle room, but for the purposes of a discussion on fatalism, I'm willing to set that aside for now.

Wait, wait, wait, Mr. wishy-washy A-Theist. How much wiggle room was there in the great FLAT-EARTH vs. ROUND-EARTH debate? It is either One or the other – not “Sorta Both”!

Where is this wiggle room you are referring to? Either your actions are determined, or you are claiming they are magical – which is it?

Franko:
Are you also claiming to be more or less conscious then your CAR?

Mussy:
Always did claim to be more.

Good. But you may want to have a chat with that knucklehead Trixy. Apparently he is convinced that all right thinking A-Theists should be of the belief that your CAR is more conscious.

Franko:
How about TLOP?

Mussy:
What about it?

Mussy, I will be more than happy to simply remind people of what an idiot you are if you don’t actually want to have a serious discussion.

TLOP controls/makes YOU controls/makes CAR

You have already stipulated that YOU are more conscious then CAR. So what about TLOP? Are you claiming to be more or less conscious then TLOP? What is your reasoning (and/or Logic) for making this claim? (why do you believe this, by what chain or thought?)

Franko:
Explain your reasoning.

Mussy:
For what, for not believing in your free-will? Let's use your example: I can't fly.

Explain your line of reasoning for concluding that TLOP is a non-conscious magical wonder-force?

I think that meshes with my understanding of fatalism (minus the prediction part). For example, if I am sick and have a serious illness, yet am fated to get better, it doesn't matter whether or not I go to the hospital. (does that match what you're saying?)

How does the prediction element come in?

I am saying that a Determinist believes that all things are Determined, but that fact – in and of itself – does not imply the ability to predict the outcome in advance. Fatalism is a belief similar to Determinism, except that Fatalism implies you can always (ultimately) predict the outcome in advance.
 
Mossy..

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Franko


I’ll debate you on anything.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Im sorry...i refuse to believe Franko actually posted that...

Do you seriously want us all to believe that Franko has other things to post about...

No...

It would make me look a kook...

Franko cannot post about anything else.....

Can you point to a post where Franko has seriously debated or participated in any other thread and not quoted anything concerning TLOPs, TOAST...CARS...ELFS...GOBLINS..and GODDESSES...that skeptics are religious....or Atheism is a religion...

Dont think so somehow...

Franko is a one point poster...a joker...a spamming troll...

Answers every question with the same answer...

Please...dont try and pretend that Franko actually has another point of view...

I dont want to be made to look like i'm making everything up...

;)
 
Franko said:
Mussy,



That’s not what you have said, and there are plenty of people here who know it Mussy.
Find one, Fran. Fine one person here who has ever seen me type the words, "I believe in free will". You can't - because it hasn't happened.

I have, however, stated repeatedly some of the following: "I think the concept of free will is meaningless", and numerous times, "Frannie, I don't believe in your free will".

Right now you have an opportunity to make someone else look like a moron for a change - all you have to do is show where I have ever claimed this. Go ahead, search away, you won't find a single time I have said that.

But that is okay, I have been kicking your ass around for a good while, and now you quietly want to concede defeat on this point. Okay … I’ll let it go. So now you are an A-Theist Determinist – is that correct?
The universe may, in fact, be deterministic - I don't know. Our current understanding of science suggests it isn't - but perhaps we are missing something. I'm willing to admit that if someone had access to the PLOP (thanks Trixy), then perhaps it would be obviously deterministic.

We don't have it, so I don't know.

You believe that all of your actions are controlled by TLOP and have been preordained since the moment of the “Big Bang” – is this correct?
See above.


Wait, wait, wait, Mr. wishy-washy A-Theist. How much wiggle room was there in the great FLAT-EARTH vs. ROUND-EARTH debate? It is either One or the other – not “Sorta Both”!
Mr. wishy-washy? :)

It is either your definition of free will, or fatalism? Says who? You?

I read me some books, and them books seem to give a whole bunch more possibilities.

Seriously Fran, you can't think you're the only person to examine the issue, right? What about all of the other great minds that have examined it, and don't agree with your either-or dilemma?

Where is this wiggle room you are referring to? Either your actions are determined, or you are claiming they are magical – which is it?

See above.


Good. But you may want to have a chat with that knucklehead Trixy. Apparently he is convinced that all right thinking A-Theists should be of the belief that your CAR is more conscious.

You're misrepresenting him, he's never said that. Hmmmm, maybe you did misrepresent my position on purpose?


Mussy, I will be more than happy to simply remind people of what an idiot you are if you don’t actually want to have a serious discussion.
Oh I'm trying to have a serious discussion - I'm also avoiding arrogance, lies and 12 year old name calling (aside from "Frannie", you know you like it), care to reciprocate?

If you'd like to show everyone what an idiot I am - here is your opportunity.

TLOP controls/makes YOU controls/makes CAR

You have already stipulated that YOU are more conscious then CAR. So what about TLOP? Are you claiming to be more or less conscious then TLOP? What is your reasoning (and/or Logic) for making this claim? (why do you believe this, by what chain or thought?)
I believe the laws of physics (PLOP, not TLOP) are not conscious.

I believe consciousness stems from our brains, thus I don't believe the laws of physics are conscious.

(anticipating from your previous responses): Begging the question? No, proceding from the only information I have. I don't have any information that consciousness comes from anywhere else, if I see any evidence I'll consider it. Do you have any to show me?




Explain your line of reasoning for concluding that TLOP is a non-conscious magical wonder-force?

See above.

I am saying that a Determinist believes that all things are Determined, but that fact – in and of itself – does not imply the ability to predict the outcome in advance. Fatalism is a belief similar to Determinism, except that Fatalism implies you can always (ultimately) predict the outcome in advance.

So if I am seriously ill, but fated to get better, then it doesn't matter if I seek medical attention?

-Ed
 
Mossy said:


So if I am seriously ill, but fated to get better, then it doesn't matter if I seek medical attention?

-Ed

Duh. You would also be "fated" to either 1) seek medical attention, 2) or not, before the live/die fate. :p


But cheer up. I too don't mind typing before engaging brain. :D
 
hammegk said:


Duh. You would also be "fated" to either 1) seek medical attention, 2) or not, before the live/die fate. :p

That's true as well, but with this question I'm specifically referring to the "choice" I make (even if it isn't really a choice).

If I'm fated to live to be a healthy 100 year old man, then I don't have to worry about going to the doctor - even when I'm sick. (of course that would already be decided as well, by my question is more addressing the person's perspective)

-Ed
 
Mussy,

Fine one person here who has ever seen me type the words, "I believe in free will". You can't - because it hasn't happened.

I could FIND no Fine person who claimed you didn’t believe in “free will”. In fact, I think you are lying and you do believe you have magic powers. You are just too embarassed to admit it any longer. You A-Theists are sooo pathetic ...

I have, however, stated repeatedly some of the following: "I think the concept of free will is meaningless", and numerous times, "Frannie, I don't believe in your free will".

What are you talking about? I don’t believe in “free will” Mussy -- but you knew that …

Right now you have an opportunity to make someone else look like a moron for a change - all you have to do is show where I have ever claimed this. Go ahead, search away, you won't find a single time I have said that.

Ohh please Mussy. Everyone knows that the reason you are so obsessed with me is that because I have wiped the floor of the R&P up with your worthless ass more times than can be counted.

Allow me to do it again …

The universe may, in fact, be deterministic - I don't know. Our current understanding of science suggests it isn't - but perhaps we are missing something.

Our current understanding of Sigh-ence suggests that things are not determinable?

How can you even conduct Sigh-ence if you can’t determine anything Mussy?

Do you just randomly select words from a dictionary when you make posts? You should try stringing them together into coherent sentences that actually reflect the way things work in reality.

I'm willing to admit that if someone had access to the PLOP (thanks Trixy), then perhaps it would be obviously deterministic.

I guess Trixy making a PLOP on you would be a predictable outcome, now that you mention it …

We don't have it, so I don't know.

So what you are claiming is that because you don’t KNOW what the complete Laws of Physics are then obviously we can (should) conclude that they don’t really exist, and instead things happen magically and supernaturally.

That is great for you A-Theists with your magical supernatural belief system, but most people don’t believe in magic Mussy. Most people are looking for a logical explanation of how things work. Especially people who are Skeptics.

You believe that all of your actions are controlled by TLOP and have been preordained since the moment of the “Big Bang” – is this correct?

Just a simple Yes or No will do.

Franko:
How much wiggle room was there in the great FLAT-EARTH vs. ROUND-EARTH debate? It is either One or the other – not “Sorta Both”!

Mussy:
It is either your definition of free will, or fatalism? Says who? You?

I thought You said you didn’t believe in “free will”? Is this another example of you honestly stating your beliefs Mussy (A-Theist)?

Do YOU control your actions Mussy, or does TLOP (ultimately). It is a simple question, why are you so terrified of answering it? Why all the lies and obfuscation? Why can’t you A-Theists ever just state what you believe, and why you believe it?

You think this makes you and the A-Theists look like you know what you are talking about? It makes you look like an idiot religious fanatic desperately trying to defend his absurd dogmatic claims by any illogical means possible.

I read me some books, and them books seem to give a whole bunch more possibilities.

You read some books!?!? Hehehe … well good for you Wussy.

… And these possibilities are?

Why mention the “books”, but not the other possibilities? So you don’t believe in “free will” Mussy? What do you believe exactly? Should we try and read your mind, or are you going to tell us? Perhaps I should just ask Stimpson, or Trixy, or De-Bungler what you believe. It is pretty obvious that they are all much smarter than you are.

Seriously Fran, you can't think you're the only person to examine the issue, right?

No.

What about all of the other great minds that have examined it, and don't agree with your either-or dilemma?

yeah … and now here you are … an A-Theist.

So what are you saying Mussy, the issue has already been decided by the great minds of the past and there is nothing new to be said or discovered? What are you doing in this forum then.

Did you some here simply to demonstrate how much smarter you were then stupid theist with their “crazy” beliefs in “invisible gods”? Did you come here just so you could pat guys like TP and De-bungler on the back about how much more “superior” you are with your magic “free will” powers, and no consequences for your actions?

I believe the laws of physics (PLOP, not TLOP) are not conscious.

I believe consciousness stems from our brains, thus I don't believe the laws of physics are conscious.

Yeah, but where did your brain stem from? Didn’t Tlop make your brain? And if TLOP made your brain, then how can TLOP be less complex and conscious than its creation?

How can a non-conscious force control a conscious one?

Besides I thought you said you don’t believe in “free will”? That means YOU aren’t doing squat – TLOP is doing everything, you are just watching. How does just watching make you more conscious then the thing doing the doing?

TLOP moves you, and it needs to perceive you to move you. You on the other hand ONLY perceive. You don’t do any of the actual moving yourself. So how can the thing that merely perceives be greater than the thing which perceives and moves (acts)?

That doesn’t make any sense.

TLOP makes/controls YOU makes/controls CAR

What you are claiming Wussy, is that YOU are superior (more conscious) to both CAR and TLOP, but clearly that doesn’t make any sense. For you to claim that you are more conscious then TLOP is as absurd as claiming that your CAR is more conscious then YOU.

What have you to say about this obvious contradiction in your beliefs?

(anticipating from your previous responses): Begging the question? No, proceding from the only information I have. I don't have any information that consciousness comes from anywhere else, if I see any evidence I'll consider it. Do you have any to show me?

TLOP controls YOU controls CAR

Don’t lie and say you don’t have this information Mussy. You simply choose to ignore it because you are insane – you Fear God and the idea of Fate. But don’t say that you don’t have ANY evidence for God. You have the evidence You just don’t want it to be True.

TLOP controls YOU in exactly the same way that you control your CAR. Perhaps your CAR is out in the parking lot this very instant telling the other nearby CARs how there is no evidence for MUSSY, and that the CAR has “free will” and controls its own Destiny. There is no evidence for the “invisible supernatural omnipotent Driver”, that is only a fairy tale that naïve stupid Theist CARs believe.

Franko:
Explain your line of reasoning for concluding that TLOP is a non-conscious magical wonder-force?

Mussy:
See above.

“See Above”? Are you making a reference to God Mussy, or just praying for guidance, because I didn’t see you present ANY evidence that TLOP is a non-conscious magical mystery force like you claim.

Just explain how a non-conscious force controls a conscious one, and please provide an example of a time when a rock, or chair, or charcoal briquette controlled your actions.

Are Dogs inferior or superior to You Mussy? Do you tend to control your pet dog, or does your pet dog tend to control you? Who tells who what they get to eat more often? Who tells who when they are allowed to go to the bathroom ?

So if I am seriously ill, but fated to get better, then it doesn't matter if I seek medical attention?

You mean kind of like if you are Fated to win the lottery you don’t have to actually buy a ticket?
 
Well, that didn't last long...


I could FIND no Fine person who claimed you didn’t believe in “free will”. In fact, I think you are lying and you do believe you have magic powers. You are just too embarassed to admit it any longer. You A-Theists are sooo pathetic ...

Step one: Make repeated accusation.
Step two: Claim that "every knows it", or anything to that effect (I believe your last one with me was, "I'll go back and find the proof that you're lying")
Step three: Concede that you can't back it up but resort to, "I just know you're lying, because I've decided atheists are liars, and you're an atheist, and you're a big liar-head!"
Step four: Stand proud and defiant at what is clearly profound and flawless argumentation.

Okay, thanks Frannie. That was fun - you may now resume lying and representing your deity in the only way you know how.


-Ed
 
I thought you wanted to discuss your beliefs Mussy?

Why won't you explain why TLOP must be a non-conscious mystery force?
 

Back
Top Bottom