Questions about Diabetes?

*bonk*

*bonk*

Wow, sarah, two people saw that coming in the last few minutes. You walked straight into a brick wall. Happy dancing trying to address the conflict that clearly exists in your assertions.
 
Sarah-I said:
I believe that Barb has already defined this for you in another thread however, as far as I am concerned, Classical homeopathy means giving remedies in accordance with both Hahnemann and Kentian principles, being one remedy at a time and not mixing remedies and waiting long enough to see what a remedy does.

In other words, the nonsense WoowooWim comes out with, that you enthusiastically defend cannot be classical?

Barb was helping to give a definition of Homeopathy (as in not necessarily classical). She never succeeded in giving an actual definition, but did attempt to.
 
Sarah-I said:
I believe that Barb has already defined this for you in another thread however, as far as I am concerned, Classical homeopathy means giving remedies in accordance with both Hahnemann and Kentian principles, being one remedy at a time and not mixing remedies and waiting long enough to see what a remedy does.
Barb's definition was completely useless. Something about when a remedy is given according to homoeopathic principles and this is followed by a cure. In one fell swoop, total failure to explain "homoeopathic principles", and redefinition so that homoeopathy can claim 100% cure ('cos if there wasn't a cure, then it wan't homoeopathy - no matter what the patient thought they were paying for).

Care to try to do better?

Of course you know why we seek such a definition. To try to understand why, every time a homoeopathic procedure is demonstrated to be ineffective, there is a concerted declaration that it "wasn't real homoeopathy". Well, if you're simply going to say that you exclude from the definition of homoeopathy any case which wasn't cured, you may be right, but you're not being much use, are you?

Now, about combination remedies.

You know as well as I do that Wim almost invariably trots out a list of at least two or three remedies any time he leaps into a thread where someone is asking about a case. Which he does very frequently. And he seldom specifies that they are to be taken at different times of the day. (And with Sarah-the-cat, he had so many doses going that if you spaced them out equally and allowed 8 hours for sleep, Alphonse would have been dosing that poor cat with magic sugar every two hours or thereabouts.)

And he never takes even the degree of clinical history that a regular doctor would ask for, never mind a full homoeopathic case-taking. And yet you're so keen to defend him, you little groupie. All this guff about exceptions and "celebrities" (at least one of whom has been in court on the charge of causing unnecessary suffering to a dog he was supposedly treating with the magic sugar), thinly disguises the fact that he's making it up as he goes along.

Why are you defending this blatantly bad practice?

(And yes, this is off-topic, but if you refuse to come to the threads where these matters have been discussed and would still be being discussed if you hadn't abandoned them, then expect to be challenged wherever you make an appearance.)

Rolfe.
 
Hello all,

I was not expecting this much response--anyway thanks for postings. Pls keep the homeopathic discussions reserved at later stage or in other topic(this subject only) as homeopathy is so strong it can hijack or overpower other discussions being HIS supported..:D

Sarah-I, Rolfe is right, I am suspicious that excess diabetic insulin increasing medications (oral medicines & injected insulin) can cause persistant high blood sugar in some conditions as insulin resistance. Regular informations are much available on one of the best LINK of ADA(American Diabetic Association) I provided in my previous posts.

As far as I understand, insulin level in body should never be low nor higher & both can probably result in persistance hyperglycemia(high BG/BS levels) depending upon the condition. Our body cells may be more sensitive to higher insulin level that higher BG level--so their resistance should be towards insulin first that to BG.

Mr.Hans, your reply this time is not so strong, pls try again in view of my indications. Have you manipulated insulin senstizer ignoring diabetic oral medicines which increases insulin secretio?

I am bit surprised that why proper replies could not be given inspite of so many clues provided by me.:(
 
Kumar said:
Sarah-I, Rolfe is right, I am suspicious that excess diabetic insulin increasing medications (oral medicines & injected insulin) can cause persistant high blood sugar in some conditions as insulin resistance. Regular informations are much available on one of the best LINK of ADA(American Diabetic Association) I provided in my previous posts.

Supply one piece of evidence that insulin resistance is the result of insulin being given instead of resulting from chronic hyperglycaemia, down-regulation of insulin-receptors and other pathological processes.

Provide that single piece of evidence or face the fact that no one is going to pay your ideas any attention.
 
Sarah-I said:
BSM,

Homeopathy has nothing at all to do with this. Did you hear me mention it?

The answer to your question is NO by the way.

Kumar,

Insulin resistance, as well as being part of diabetes is also thought to be part of PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome). A lot of women who suffer from this syndrome are given the drug Metformin as treatment, as it is felt that the causation is insulin resistance, so treating the insulin resistance might help in these cases. However, not all people with insulin resistance are diabetic.

This relation is not given on:-
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/000369.htm

But given on:-
http://www.fertilityplus.org/faq/metformin.html#pcos

Anyway, can reduction in salt intake lower/control blood glucose levels in consderation of my previous postings/referances?
 
Sarah-I said:
Kumar,

For certain substances to enter the cells to be utilised by them, they need protein carriers to do this. Ways of doing this are Active Transport. Active Transport uses what is known as the Sodium/Potassium Pump and substances move from an area of low concentration to an area of high concentration against a concentration gradient.

Kumar, perhaps you are becoming slightly confused by the use of the term Sodium in this respect? You do know that there is a higher concentration of Potassium inside the cell and a higher concentration of Sodium outside the cell?

How can you relate it to absorption of salt & sugar in intestines? Pls refer quote provided by me about carbohydrates absorption.
 
Kumar said:
As far as I understand, insulin level in body should never be low nor higher & both can probably result in persistance hyperglycemia(high BG/BS levels) depending upon the condition. Our body cells may be more sensitive to higher insulin level that higher BG level--so their resistance should be towards insulin first that to BG.

You are confusing cause and effect. High insulin levels are the RESULT, not the cause, of high BG. Now, it is possible that a very high insulin level due to faulty administering of insulin where sensitizing had been appropriate might speed up the developement of insensitivity, but that comes under the gross misprescribing I mentioned.

Mr.Hans, your reply this time is not so strong, pls try again in view of my indications. Have you manipulated insulin senstizer ignoring diabetic oral medicines which increases insulin secretio?

I am bit surprised that why proper replies could not be given inspite of so many clues provided by me.:(

WHAAAT? Come off it! Not only do you expect me to answer your endless overly naive questions, most of which turn out to have a hidden agenda, but now you are taking on a school-master tone? Proper replies, indeed. My answers are based on facts. If you don't like facts, I suggest you slink back to your woo woo boards and discuss your dream-world with Bach, Wim, Divina, et al.

:nope:

Hans
 
MRC_Hans said:
WHAAAT? Come off it! Not only do you expect me to answer your endless overly naive questions, most of which turn out to have a hidden agenda, but now you are taking on a school-master tone? Proper replies, indeed. My answers are based on facts. If you don't like facts, I suggest you slink back to your woo woo boards and discuss your dream-world with Bach, Wim, Divina, et al.
He does it to everyone in the end. Give him information he likes and can twist to his own purpose, or get smacked by Kumar-the-genius-poster.

No, he doesn't like facts.

Remember this thread? More than a year ago. Kumar was told all this then, and he's just behaving as if the thread had never happened. In spite of everything, he still thinks that treating a diabetic makes them worse. Because of something he thinks he observed, the details of which he won't tell us, and which he is almost certainly misinterpreting anyway.

Let's talk about something else.

Rolfe.
 
MRC_Hans said:
You are confusing cause and effect. High insulin levels are the RESULT, not the cause, of high BG. Now, it is possible that a very high insulin level due to faulty administering of insulin where sensitizing had been appropriate might speed up the developement of insensitivity, but that comes under the gross misprescribing I mentioned.

Insulin can act both as cause & effect. High BG causes more insulin secretion-here High BG is cause & high insulin secretion an effect. Right? Now, as you said "high insulin level due to faulty administering of insulin where sensitizing had been appropriate might speed up the developement of insensitivity", higher insulin level can be a cause to insensitivity of it, due to its excess exposure to cells, excess BG level thus caused by this insestivity so "the effect". Right?

Now say at pre-diabetic stage; due to fault in eating habits (irregular, excessive, occasional & sugar specifics) & due to other modern lifestyle & environment--occasional & excess insulin may be secreted-which may result in speeding up insulin senstivity>>so high BG. The cause here is excess insulin>>if you then firthur increase insulin by medication>>more insenstiveness>>>persistant high BG>>rest you can understand.:(
 
Badly Shaved Monkey said:
Kumar.

I am not chasing your rabbits for you. Pull out the relevant information from your links and create an argument from them.

BSM, these are bit dynamic/differant aspects. Links may just help in linking but will not in telling exactly. As far as as I could link--these looks bit positive as yet, but you people are specialized in making the most negative, so presenting here for your.....:D
 
Rolfe said:
He does it to everyone in the end. Give him information he likes and can twist to his own purpose, or get smacked by Kumar-the-genius-poster.

No, he doesn't like facts.

Remember this thread? More than a year ago. Kumar was told all this then, and he's just behaving as if the thread had never happened. In spite of everything, he still thinks that treating a diabetic makes them worse. Because of something he thinks he observed, the details of which he won't tell us, and which he is almost certainly misinterpreting anyway.

Let's talk about something else.

Rolfe.
Rolfe, only one work on hand, nowdays. These skin removings from hair ultimately cause--losing respect in heart--me, others or anyone.
 
Kumar said:
Anyway, can reduction in salt intake lower/control blood glucose levels in consderation of my previous postings/referances?

NO!

Are you just going to keep asking the question until you get the answer you want to hear? Jeebus. :rolleyes:

-TT
 
ThirdTwin said:
NO!

Are you just going to keep asking the question until you get the answer you want to hear? Jeebus. :rolleyes:

-TT

TT,

What do you say in consideration of following quote (was also quoted previously in this topic:-

carbohydrate absorption


Carbohydrate absorption tends to occur at the small intestine brush border:

fructose:
absorbed passively down a concentration gradient
binds to a specific carrier protein in the apical cell membrane
either:
diffuses passively out of cells and into capillaries
forms lactate which then diffuses into portal blood

glucose:
absorbed mainly in jejunum by active process
enters via a co-transporter protein on the apical side of the enterocyte
co-transporter requires presence of sodium ions
sodium ions pass down electrochemical gradient into cell to replace sodium ions which are actively being transported out of cell on basolateral membrane by Na+/K+ ATPase pump
glucose diffuses out of cell into intercellular space and from there to local capillaries
chloride ions and water accompany the movement of sodium and glucose; they may travel through the cell or through the intercellular space

galactose: absorbed by a similar sodium-dependent co-transporter as glucose
The dependence of water and salt absorption on the absorption of glucose is the reason why oral rehydration solutions contain all three components.
http://www.gpnotebook.co.uk/cache/818937895.htm
 
Kumar said:
Rolfe, only one work on hand, nowdays. These skin removings from hair ultimately cause--losing respect in heart--me, others or anyone.
You lost all my respect months ago. I respected you as a true seeker after knowledge, but you turn out not to care about knowledge, only about getting someone to say that your bizarre preconceived deas are correct.

No respect here any more.

Rolfe.
 
Rolfe said:
You lost all my respect months ago. I respected you as a true seeker after knowledge, but you turn out not to care about knowledge, only about getting someone to say that your bizarre preconceived deas are correct.

No respect here any more.

Rolfe.

Good words looks bad to you, formal but illogicalwords looks good to you. What to do, just flatter????:(
 

Back
Top Bottom