• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Prediction for the coming Eclipse:

I dislike your presentation of my theory...

First, it took "us" modern humans less than a century to go from Kitty Hawk to the Moon. How long have we been in this form? Thousands upon thousands...? Isn't it MORE likely that the heavens are replete with different Us's, that a foreign interstellar visitor hasn't invaded and taken all of our precious metals and resources yet?

Advanced race, like Atlantis?

You've used this "less than a century to go from Kitty Hawk to the Moon" line a few times, as though it actually means anything, lol.

No, it's not "more likely" that we have flooded the universe with our spaceships from yesteryear, in fact, that's about as likely as the idea that Loch Ness is home to a species of prehistoric sea creature, even less likely than the idea that California is home to a race of 10-foot-tall ape-men, and even more ridiculous than the idea that the earth is bloody flat.

So, you've no evidence after all, then?
 
Ahhh...

Your post is interesting, in its appearance here, its content, and your use of "'s.

I would write a retort, but I think your post speaks for itself, and I need say no more.

Awww, come on. I am giving you what you want: Attention.

You owe me a big fat "Thank you very very very much, StackOverflow, for giving me that juicy attention that I love so much".

So, hurry up and thank me.
 
I remember reading an account by someone who walked out onto their porch in the morning and saw a number of large silver spheres hovering high above them in the sky. Then their eyes refocused, and they realized they were looking at drops of dew on a spider web a couple feet in front of their face.
Then there was the ring-shaped UFO that was hovering over a crowded amusement park in Virginia back in 2009 (which only one person apparently managed to film). If you view the video, it bears a striking resemblance to a water droplet on a window a short distance from the camera lens.


My favorite is the train engineer who frantically put his train in reverse because he saw another train coming towards him. It was Venus.
 
Again. Kindly stop lying to yourself and everyone else.

You have flat-out said that what you saw was some sort of manned aircraft that did not come from us humans.

Of course you saw a UFO (unidentified flying object), but just because you saw a UFO that does not automatically mean that you saw some sort of non-human aircraft and/or spacecraft.

C'mon....

Who you gonna believe?

The chief engineer on the Enterprise, or someone claiming to be North American Royalty?
 
So, how did they build their spaceships with stone age technology?
Alternatively, where are the traces of a global advanced industrial society that would be needed to build spaceships?
If we find pottery and bone fragments from the dawn of mankind, where are all the huge ports, nuclear reactors and strip mines?

You're asking us what kind of evidence we'd be willing to accept, but that's only because you have none to offer.
Do you let us make the first move and then you criticize that to deflect attention away from your lack of evidence.
 
Awww, come on. I am giving you what you want: Attention.

You owe me a big fat "Thank you very very very much, StackOverflow, for giving me that juicy attention that I love so much".

So, hurry up and thank me.

Let me check my pocket...yeah I've got a little left...

You can have this *scorn.*
 
You've used this "less than a century to go from Kitty Hawk to the Moon" line a few times, as though it actually means anything, lol.

No, it's not "more likely" that we have flooded the universe with our spaceships from yesteryear, in fact, that's about as likely as the idea that Loch Ness is home to a species of prehistoric sea creature, even less likely than the idea that California is home to a race of 10-foot-tall ape-men, and even more ridiculous than the idea that the earth is bloody flat.

So, you've no evidence after all, then?

How likely are Neanderthals for the bigfoot sightings?

If their habitat never disappeared, maybe they didn't either?

I think less than one hundred years to achieve inner space flight is a rather short period when you consider how long humanity has existed as we do.
 
Yet to establish credibility of Atlantis hypothesis, yet uses it as a fait accompli to explain something else where the conclusion is only supported by assertions.

The performance doesn't change, even though the topic does...
 
How likely are Neanderthals for the bigfoot sightings?

If their habitat never disappeared, maybe they didn't either?

I think less than one hundred years to achieve inner space flight is a rather short period when you consider how long humanity has existed as we do.

Non-sequitur stacked on non-sequitur stacked on false dichotomy. Actors in gorilla suits are more likely than either modern neanderthals or bigfoots.
 
How likely are Neanderthals for the bigfoot sightings?

If their habitat never disappeared, maybe they didn't either?

I think less than one hundred years to achieve inner space flight is a rather short period when you consider how long humanity has existed as we do.

The Neanderthals aren't likely at all, since they weren't 7-10 feet-tall, didn't have exceedingly long arms, used tools and generally were more human-like in their behaviour, which Bigfoot apparently isn't, since it doesn't use fire, tools, or anything remotely useful for a creature living in the wilderness, which makes it all the more silly when you actually think about it.

There's an argument that the Bigfoot of Russia and parts of Asia, which equally doesn't exist, is inspired by stories of such relic humans as Neanderthals, but the chances of Neanderthals inspiring stories of giants of the PNW are slim and none, and slim just buggered off.

You could say that less than a hundred years is too short a span for us to achieve anything we've achieved, and it seems true when you think of it without actually using your melon and properly understanding what we have achieved, and why we achieved it, rather than the span we've achieved it in.

To assume that we've done nothing as a race is to sully our achievements and simply muddy the waters of human achievement as a whole.

On the other hand, we've far more evidence of our own technological achievements than we have for a far less likely scenario where ancient humans suddenly developed the power to fly into space. I mean, do you even think about that stuff rationally, or is it just romantically?
 
Non-sequitur stacked on non-sequitur stacked on false dichotomy. Actors in gorilla suits are more likely than either modern neanderthals or bigfoots.

Okay, but if it's NOT a hoax, and they HAD to exist, the mostly likely source is a super-smart, tracker-like network of Neanderthals that use forests and adjoining nature-scapes to move around. These were those who survived the man-hunts, those who covered their tracks, travel in trees or on rocks, collected their dead, and knew how to detect and avoid humans.

if you look at a national picture of reported sightings, you can see pathways...a network.

I think this is far more likely than idiots taking a chance of becoming someone's wall art.
 
Last edited:
Okay, but if it's NOT a hoax, and they HAD to exist, the mostly likely source is a super-smart, tracker-like network of Neanderthals that use forests and adjoining nature-scapes to move around. These were those who survived the man-hunts, those who covered their tracks, travel in trees or on rocks, collected their dead, and knew how to detect and avoid humans.

if you look at a national picture of reported sightings, you can see pathways...a network.

I think this is far more likely than idiots taking a chance of becoming someone's wall art.

What on earth are you talking about now? lol.

So, you think Neanderthals were akin to fur-covered, long-armed ape-men who stood between 7 and 10 foot-tall? Where exactly do you get your history from? Atlantians going into space, Neanderthals suddenly turning into giant ape-men...where does this nonsense end?

Literally everything you just typed is absolute drivel, mate. Traveling in the trees or on rocks? Collecting their dead? Dafuq are you on about?
 
Or maybe they were much smaller and closer than you were assuming, in which case the maneuvers were not as remarkable as you thought.

Or maybe it's your assumption that they were objects that is mistaken, and they were actually odd reflections of lights from below.

The only thing you can say for certain is that you saw something in the sky that you could not identify. You have no basis whatsoever for drawing any conclusion about what it was you saw.

When I have time, I'll dig up the various versions of this anecdote that have been posted here. It's now been enough time posting here to see how his story has really changed over time. I think that it might be illustrative as to the failings of human memory.
 
Okay, but if it's NOT a hoax, and they HAD to exist, the mostly likely source is a super-smart, tracker-like network of Neanderthals that use forests and adjoining nature-scapes to move around. These were those who survived the man-hunts, those who covered their tracks, travel in trees or on rocks, collected their dead, and knew how to detect and avoid humans.

if you look at a national picture of reported sightings, you can see pathways...a network.

I think this is far more likely than idiots taking a chance of becoming someone's wall art.
Right.

http://blogs.forteana.org/node/100
 
Okay, but if it's NOT a hoax, and they HAD to exist, the mostly likely source is a super-smart, tracker-like network of Neanderthals that use forests and adjoining nature-scapes to move around. These were those who survived the man-hunts, those who covered their tracks, travel in trees or on rocks, collected their dead, and knew how to detect and avoid humans.

if you look at a national picture of reported sightings, you can see pathways...a network.

I think this is far more likely than idiots taking a chance of becoming someone's wall art.
No if they had to exist they would have to have the characteristics those that claim they do exist say they do so no they could not be Neanderthals.
 
I predict that bigfoot will accidently stare at the eclipse and become blinded...thus allowing Rick Dyer to capture him.
 
But it is and they don't so the rest of your post was plucked from a nether orifice. And is off-topic.

It's associated, as the logic behind both of my assumptions are based is "the mostly likely reality, if there is an X-entity"-theory.

Loch Ness doesn't have enough fish to support a large animal...so if Nessy is real, there must be an ocean access point.
 

Back
Top Bottom