Slowvehicle
Membership Drive , Co-Ordinator,, Russell's Antin
OK, I have to take a break now, I´ll be back later and try to articulate again why I think demands for evidence of the same form that would be acceptable to prove other things is not expectable in the case of CT-s. That it´s more like a crime scene investigation where you suspect someone has been tampering with the evidence. But later.
Meanwhile let me point you to my post 616, (the number of the beast, weird innit?), I don´t think anyone has noticed it... any thoughts?
1. 616 is not "the number of the Beast".
2. I pointed out that you, yourself, did not seem to notice that your post argues against itself...
...were you expecting more?