It's just adorable that some think this is about drugs.Venezuela's oil isn't Venezuela's it's Trump's. Drill, baby, drill. Find all that Trump oil Venezuela stole.
It's just adorable that some think this is about drugs.Venezuela's oil isn't Venezuela's it's Trump's. Drill, baby, drill. Find all that Trump oil Venezuela stole.
Again, don't expect a reply. They're not good at coming up with answers outside of their pre-programmed talking points.Is every country free to kidnap citizens of other countries, if they have oil?
Trump: Venezuela was increasingly hosting foreign adversaries in our region and acquiring weapons that could threaten U.S. Interests and lives. They used those weapons last night.
The Donroe Document.
Trump: "All the way back it dated to the Monroe Doctrines. And the Monroe Doctrine is a big deal. But we've superseded it by a lot. By a real lot. They now call it the Donroe Document. I don't know. It's Monroe Doctrine. We sort of forgot about it."
Hmm. Bigger than, say, Desert Storm then? Bigger than Inchon? I have a suspicion there are US veterans of quite a number of post-WW2 actions who will be a bit put out by that.Trump: "It was an assault like people have not seen since World War 2"
Well, that's an interesting point of view.
According to reports, Maduro's forces did not fire a single shot against the U.S. attack. Venezuela's military has, essentially, abandoned the Maduro regime. Anyone from the regime contemplating stepping into power will do so knowing that they have no military backing and knowing that the U.S. can step in at will and take them out.
Nope. There will be no more drug lords in charge of Venezuela on Trump's watch.
Donald deserves the $50 million
RUBIO: He is a fugitive of American justice with a $50 million award. I guess we saved $50 million.
TRUMP: We should make sure. Don't let anybody claim it. Nobody deserves it but us.
Apart from they haven't done the occupying bit.But now you're going to occupy Venezuela. You invaded a country and decapitated its government and now you're going to be an army of occupation until they elect someone you like. How much is that going to cost per day?
Los Angeles for some reason
Trump: "We saved Los Angeles early on, where the head of the police department made a statement that if the federal govt didn't come in, we would've lost Los Angeles. That's after the fires. That's when they had the riots. We did a great job. Got no credit for it whatsoever. It doesn't matter."
Well, that's an interesting point of view.
According to reports, Maduro's forces did not fire a single shot against the U.S. attack. Venezuela's military has, essentially, abandoned the Maduro regime. Anyone from the regime contemplating stepping into power will do so knowing that they have no military backing and knowing that the U.S. can step in at will and take them out.
Nope. There will be no more drug lords in charge of Venezuela on Trump's watch.
The indictment includes a claim for forfeiture. The defendants will need to forfeit to the United States all of the proceeds arising from their violation of U.S. law.They took our property.
Apart from they haven't done the occupying bit.
I guess Venezuela will just go along with it.
There was a TV series about this s couple of years ago https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4192998/Norway has a lot of oil. Arbeiderpsrtiet call themselves democratic socialists, that means communist, so a de facto dictatorship. Someone should do something about that, a bigger neighbour, perhaps, who has their best interest at heart.
Yes. I think any country's courts have jurisdiciton over anyone who violates that countrz's laws anywhere, The U.S. is hardly the only country to issue arrest warrants against people who aren't currently in the country. What, if anything, is controversial, is one country abducting someone who has violated its laws from another country.
Strangely, though, no one seemed to put up much of a fuss when the U.S. invaded Panama to arrest Noriega.
And the legal jurisdiction argument is really sort of red herring anyway. The U.S., I would think, just committed an act of war against Venezuela. Was it illegal under international law? Yeah, probably. Was it the moral thing to do? Yeah, probably, for both the U.S. and for the people of Venezuela.
And let's not even bring up congressional approval. The last time Congress declared war World War II, and the U.S. has undertaken hundreds of doreign military actions since then.
You were talking about the people of Venezuela charting their own course, that's what I was responding to.I have no love for Maduro, but that does not mean that other countries should be allowed to kidnap him. (And as dictators go, he is far from the worst. Some of Trump's best friends are among the top 10, he is not.) If the "leader of the free world" is allowed/allows himself to go rogue, we're well and truly ◊◊◊◊◊◊. This signals to China that they can take Taiwan, and underscores how eminently unsuitable the US is in the role of peace broker between Ukraine and Russia.
The legal justification cited in the indictment is 18 U.S.C. § 3238, which establishes venue for crimes committed outside any judicial district of the United States, but it does not provided a basis for personal jurisdiction over persons who are otherwise outside the jurisdiction of the United States. § 3238 is meant to apply to such things as crimes committed upon the high seas on U.S.-flagged vessels or on U.S. territories or installations outside the borders of the U.S. In those cases, personal jurisdiction was already implied. If it's legal for you to own a machine gun where you live, you cannot lawfully be kidnapped from that place and brought to the U.S. to face charges of violating U.S. law against machine guns.Workshopping rationalizations in real time, covering all the bases.
Ooh! I know this one!You were talking about the people of Venezuela charting their own course, that's what I was responding to.
Almost a million Venezuelans decided to make the perilous trek the the fascist, racist, misogynist, transphobic, homophobic...USA because their country was worse. Maybe now they'll have (at least more of) a chance at self determination.
...but it's not about oil.TRUMP: Well, you know, it won't cost us anything because the money coming out of the ground is very substantial