Carefulplease
Thinker
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2007
- Messages
- 153
With "partial" response from Gordon Ross.
journalof911studies.com/letters/RossResponsetoAnonymous.pdf
journalof911studies.com/letters/RossResponsetoAnonymous.pdf
Thanks! That was the letter I actually meant to link.Newton's response - pdf[/URL]
It's Newton's Bit, not Newton BritI don't know where his part is.
As I have noted before, Gordon Ross assumes that all sections of the towers were created (more or less) equal.... However, the upper (tilting) section of WTC 1 was surely more resiliant than the lower (fixed) section because of the stiffening effect of the hat truss. Try crushing a beer can that has been damaged with a horizontal cut near the top of the can. The can buckles completely near the cut, and down from the cut; but it is very difficult to initiate buckling near the top of the can.
I assume the OP was referring to this:Hey guys...
All of you have linked to Ross's response. Does anyone have a link to Newton Brit's letter?
-Gumboot
I assume the OP was referring to this:
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/AnonymousLettertoGordonRoss.pdf
Although it apparently was submitted anonymously.
Carefulplease, how do you know this was written by Newtons Bit?
They complain about an anonymous letter, but they don't mind "Arabesque" using a pseudonym. His latest letter is particularly inane.