New telepathy test, the sequel.

Michel H said:
I recently wrote one of the four words: "automobile", "boat", "plane", and "submarine" on my paper, and I surrounded it with a rough ellipse.
Click to expand...

You already know that the above is a flawed experiment and you can dismiss results you don't like.

You claim you can use your telepathy to make animals do things and a perfect experiment exists for you to test yourself at home and if OK, then tell skeptics and repeat the same experiment as hard evidence.

Why are you refusing to undertake an experiment that can offer you clear results? Are you avoiding a proper test on purpose? Why is that? Do you now have doubts?
 
Matthew Ellard said:
I thought more about this, simply as an exercise in how to allow Michel Hanck to undertake the SKEPP 25,000 Euro paranormal challenge, in his home country of Belgium, for the least cost.



A) Michel H can make animals do things.
B) Michel H will not undertake the test as he cannot find a credible human partner.

Here is a simple experiment that satisfies Michel's dilemma. A random exit is chosen and Michel makes the mouse walk through that exit. We repeat this over and over again until statistically significant results can be assessed. :)
Click to expand...
Matthew Ellard said:
...

You claim you can use your telepathy to make animals do things and a perfect experiment exists for you to test yourself at home and if OK, then tell skeptics and repeat the same experiment as hard evidence.

Why are you refusing to undertake an experiment that can offer you clear results? Are you avoiding a proper test on purpose? Why is that? Do you now have doubts?
Click to expand...
Matthew, you said
Michel H can make animals do things.
Click to expand...
It seems to me that such a statement is ambiguous, and possibly misleading. Animals are not slaves who are going to obey all my "telepathic orders", and I never said such things. They are independent-minded, they like to be treated with respect, much like humans.

For example, a few years ago, I asked everybody to make noises of the type "2 + 1", like "teet!, teet!, ..., "teet". What I had then in mind was mostly automobile drivers (using their horns), and I did indeed hear a few such noises a few times, a little later. However, to my surprise, I heard birds participate in the experiment as well (crows, I think, perhaps twice). It was truly extraordinary, because their "2 + 1" noises sounded very different from ordinary bird cries, they sounded calm and "scientific" (birds usually do not sound like this).

A few minutes ago, about at the time I wrote "Animals are not slaves who are going to obey all my telepathic orders, and I never said such things. They are independent-minded, they like to be treated with respect, much like humans., I also heard an apparent bird reaction (in the form of three cries by a crow, in quick succession, I think, expressing interest, with also a certain form of "authority", by an animal which demands to be treated with respect).

An extraordinary event just happened in California (which, fortunately, was non-violent, nobody got injured this time), look here: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38034467
The BBC wrote:
The public has been warned to not to touch the foam as it is a skin irritant.
Click to expand...
,
with an extra "to" (number two seems to be sometimes associated with telepathy, this seems to be related to my birth date: 22/2, 22 February). This seems to be California's reaction to my latest test, for the English-speaking community.
 
Michel H said:
...


The BBC wrote:


,


with an extra "to" (number two seems to be sometimes associated with telepathy, this seems to be related to my birth date: 22/2, 22 February). This seems to be California's reaction to my latest test, for the English-speaking community.
Click to expand...


There's an obvious joke about number two's association with telepathy but it would only distract from the amazing display of hyperconnection you just expressed. You think that the effect of your latest experiment was to cause an incident in California, which in turn caused a report to be written by a journalist in London, which contained an erroneous extra "to", which is a homonym of "two", which you see as significant because it matches the date you were born.

I am not a doctor, but when something screams "symptom" loudly enough, even I can spot it.
 
Michel H said:
I have already tried to explain on this forum how I seem to be able to communicate telepathically with animals (cats, dogs, birds) near my building, but I am not sure you paid any attention. And this phenomenon is very easy to verify: for example, when a dog is barking, I talk to him/her from inside my apartment with a weak voice (so he/she cannot hear me normally, sensorially), and I study whether there is a reaction, a change (often there is).
Click to expand...

You already clearly stated you can make animals do things.

Michel H said:
It seems to me that such a statement is ambiguous, and possibly misleading. Animals are not slaves who are going to obey all my "telepathic orders", and I never said such things. They are independent-minded, they like to be treated with respect, much like humans.
Click to expand...

Were you not telling the truth previously? Are you telling the truth today? :boggled:

So, Michel Hanck, please explain to us how you assess "non-credible animals" against "credible animals?".
 
Matthew Ellard said:
You already clearly stated you can make animals do things.



Were you not telling the truth previously? Are you telling the truth today? :boggled:

So, Michel Hanck, please explain to us how you assess "non-credible animals" against "credible animals?".
Click to expand...
For privacy reasons, it is perhaps better that you call me "Michel H", or just "Michel".

With animals, an obvious difference, compared with human beings, is that I never see texts written by them, together with a test answer, about which I have to ask myself:"Is this credible, or not?" Does this dog sound sincere when he tells me I wrote "automobile" on my paper? (I chose "automobile" here, just because it is the first on my list of possible choices). So the question of credibility does not arise. The one who cannot talk also cannot lie.
 
P.J. Denyer said:
Person who claims to transmit their every thought to the entire world thinks that having their surname used violates their privacy? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
"Violating my privacy" are perhaps strong words, but I prefer being on the secure side. I don't want that too many people begin asking themselves "where does this guy live?, mmmh, where is the phone book?" (or the online equivalent) and stuff.
 
Michel H said:
"Violating my privacy" are perhaps strong words, but I prefer being on the secure side. I don't want that too many people begin asking themselves "where does this guy live?, mmmh, where is the phone book?" (or the online equivalent) and stuff.
Click to expand...

Yet somehow, you actively want people to reach inside your brain via telepathy?

It's almost as if you don't believe in telepathy at all.

Besides, YOU made such information publicly available. Nobody else, only YOU.
 
I don't recall Michel using his full name on this forum and even though he thinks we all hear what he's thinking, the rest of us don't and I for one am not comfortable with his being addressed by his real name here for no reason I can discern.
 
Jack by the hedge said:
I don't recall Michel using his full name on this forum and even though he thinks we all hear what he's thinking, the rest of us don't and I for one am not comfortable with his being addressed by his real name here for no reason I can discern.
Click to expand...

Not on this forum, but elsewhere and publicly done, most often associated with a variation of his "telepathy" test. Nobody made him do it, nobody doxxed him, he just posted it in public. Game over.

Personally, I have never addressed him by full name because why should I? According to him, I can read his mind.

In any event, he has volunteered this information publicly. This is his problem, not mine.
 
Michel H said:
"Violating my privacy" are perhaps strong words, but I prefer being on the secure side. I don't want that too many people begin asking themselves "where does this guy live?, mmmh, where is the phone book?" (or the online equivalent) and stuff.
Click to expand...

Point missed completely. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Michel H said:
"Violating my privacy" are perhaps strong words, but I prefer being on the secure side. I don't want that too many people begin asking themselves "where does this guy live?, mmmh, where is the phone book?" (or the online equivalent) and stuff.
Click to expand...

It would invalidate the test of you writing down and concentrating on your phone number, certainly. But, then, you seem strangely reluctant to do that test.
 
Is this a necessary discussion? Michel H would prefer not to have his surname used here, even though he provided a means for the other members to easily discern it. Okay by me: Michel H seems good enough for our purposes here.

Michel H- as you know I have generally opted out of this thread after concluding that I can't really help you, although wishing you success in finding a happy path in your life. But I am curious, have you discussed with your family, friends, doctors, advisors, etc. the fact that you periodically come to this forum to re-initiate your telepathy tests? I have found that aspect of this thread particularly mysterious- you appear to be very convinced of your own telepathic abilities yet you also appear to strongly feel the need to "test" them here every few weeks or months. This occurs even given that you almost always interpret the prior tests as affirming your abilities. What is your motivation as you see it? Do you see posting these tests as having improved your ability to deal with the negative thoughts that you have also expressed here? Indeed, if just posting these tests makes you happier, then that alone would make me feel happier when I encounter this thread.

In addition, perhaps if you explore more (in your own mind and with others) why you feel the need to periodically test your "abilities" (as you see them) it might help you better understand your "abilities." And this understanding, including any insecurities you might have about your "abilities," might prove a useful beginning for enhancing your ability to deal with/control them in a productive way.

These are just my ignorant musings- again I wish you the best in your life without knowing exactly how you might achieve that. But I do think that you (as anyone) should make certain to use the help and support of those around you who care about you.
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
It would invalidate the test of you writing down and concentrating on your phone number, certainly. But, then, you seem strangely reluctant to do that test.
Click to expand...

Or to test sending any large number (preferably random) that, if replicated by a recipient, would greatly validate the statistics of the test. I am certain that Michel H understands that, and his reluctance to do so is another aspect that he may wish to consider when thinking about why he sets up these tests and what that means in terms of how he views his "abilities".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom