If you are not talking about Bondi, there is another thread for you.Personally probably nothing. I mean it is likely some of them support the killing of Muslims like so many do on this forum.
If you are not talking about Bondi, there is another thread for you.Personally probably nothing. I mean it is likely some of them support the killing of Muslims like so many do on this forum.
Are you implying that Iranians cannot be antisemites?By the way, in case anyone raises the firebombing of the synagogue in Melbourne in 2024 as an example of antisemitism related to Gaza, it was in fact organised and funded by the other enemy of Israel, Iran.
Interestingly, the Bondi attack was not carried out by white neo-nazis. If we're quibbling about "mostly peaceful" entho-cultural nexi (nexae?) in Australia, the neo-nazis come out smelling like roses on this one.It's always lovely to see the knee-jerk reactions.
What you need to be asking, is why a bloke born in the lucky country felt the need to kill Jews. And it's not "Islam" because there are a million muslims in Aussie and only one terrorist attack.
Someone can check for me how many muslims there are in this photo, from a whole month before Bondi:
I counted 0, and with 1 sent back to RSA, I think the rest of them are white Australian men.
Is a 'clutch' the proper term for a plurality of neo-nazis? I would have thought a 'flock', as in 'flock off, nazis'.it could have been a couple Catholics, or a pair of Aboriginals, or even a clutch of neo-Nazis?
An odor of neo-nazis.Is a 'clutch' the proper term for a plurality of neo-nazis? I would have thought a 'flock', as in 'flock off, nazis'.
Is a 'clutch' the proper term for a plurality of neo-nazis? I would have thought a 'flock', as in 'flock off, nazis'.
Efforts at misdirection notwithstanding, let's keep in mind that neo-nazis aren't actually relevant to topic.An odor of neo-nazis.
Efforts at misdirection notwithstanding, let's keep in mind that neo-nazis aren't actually relevant to topic.
Neo-nazis would never come out smelling like roses about anything!neo-nazis come out smelling like roses on this one.
Really? No. This attack has been raised to demonstrate the rise of antisemitism of Australians.Are you implying that Iranians cannot be antisemites?
Why would you think that? Did you miss the qualifying clause in that sentence, "related to Gaza"?Are you implying that Iranians cannot be antisemites?
No I didn't. There has been discussion in this thread that the shootings were "retaliation" for recent events in Gaza. Iran in 2024 were not exactly supporters of Israel's actions in Gaza.Why would you think that? Did you miss the qualifying clause in that sentence, "related to Gaza"?
The phrase was intended to be ironic when it was created before you thought it could be clever to use it ironically."Lucky country"
I know that. I seem to be having trouble getting your point. Is it that no actual Australians were involved in that firebombing?Really? No. This attack has been raised to demonstrate the rise of antisemitism of Australians.
They were not motivated by antisemitism but by money.I know that. I seem to be having trouble getting your point. Is it that no actual Australians were involved in that firebombing?
Who was?They were not motivated by antisemitism but by money.
The arsonists. Iran admitted to paying them.Who was?