• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Is this a real ghost?

If the picture is unretouched, I'd say it's a reflection of the TV screen on the back window.
 
We need a facepalm icon.

Articles like that are always filled with stupid people posting stupid comments, like this one:

Kelli GoLightly said:
I love when stuff like this happens. Little glimpses into another realm or dimension. Cameras always pick these things up
Click to expand...

:hb:
 
That ghost spoils what would otherwise be a beautiful photo.
 
tinribmancer said:
Articles like that are always filled with stupid people posting stupid comments, like this one:

"I love when stuff like this happens. Little glimpses into another realm or dimension. Cameras always pick these things up"

:hb:
Click to expand...
I once came across a guy on another forum, who ran ghost tours for a living, and who claimed to be a professional photographer, who made one of the silliest comments I've seen about ghosts and cameras.

He claimed that 'modern lens grinding techniques' allowed camera lens to pick up more of the electromagnetic spectrum and this allows new cameras to be better at photographing ghosts. What do you even say to something like that?
 
fuelair said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines


eta welcome in and www.dogpile.com is your friend!!!!!
Click to expand...

RationalWiki's version is funnier better, IMO.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law

which re-directs me to the page "Just Asking Questions (9/11 twoofer tactic)"

RationalWiki said:
The JREF forums call it "JAQing off." "Marquis de Carabas" coined the acronymous term after they had dealt with one too many 9/11 truthers, with this later description by "VespaGuy"
Click to expand...

:D

JesseCuster said:
I once came across a guy on another forum, who ran ghost tours for a living, and who claimed to be a professional photographer, who made one of the silliest comments I've seen about ghosts and cameras.

He claimed that 'modern lens grinding techniques' allowed camera lens to pick up more of the electromagnetic spectrum and this allows new cameras to be better at photographing ghosts. What do you even say to something like that?
Click to expand...

Facepalming seems to be the best option. Same goes for idiots that make the same claims about "filming ghosts"... :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
JesseCuster said:
I once came across a guy on another forum, who ran ghost tours for a living, and who claimed to be a professional photographer, who made one of the silliest comments I've seen about ghosts and cameras.

He claimed that 'modern lens grinding techniques' allowed camera lens to pick up more of the electromagnetic spectrum and this allows new cameras to be better at photographing ghosts. What do you even say to something like that?
Click to expand...

Perhaps, "No offence, but you're nuts"?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom