thaiboxerken said:
By frame 12 he is waaaay lower and looks to me to be totally off balance. Pole isn't even vertical yet.
The center of gravity of the pole is not behind the guy. He is not off balance at that point. You are still seeing what you believe and not what's really happening.
[/B]
The pole's weight is neglible compared to his own mass and his own center of gravity is way to far forward. We seem to be going in circles here, maybe you should look at what others have said.
Notice Pyrrho's post and pics here:
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28067
Pyrrho said:
A few critical frames:
In frame 1, Mr. Tri approaches.
In frame 2, something other than a person appears behind Mr. Tri.
In frame 3, the object is quite evident. Looks like a fabric tube of some kind, possibly a sleeve?
In frame 4, immediately after this object appears, Mr. Tri falls.
His frame 4 is the exact same frame as the one numbered 12 that I was refeering to. Bluemonk (who's thread I linked to before and called it frame 12
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27750) thought that was when the fall began also. Interestingly, though there is much doubt and debate about what the object behind him is nobody in either thread has challenged the notion that that is when the fall began. And you say you are "100% sure" that the fall did not begin there.
To me it is really clear that you are the person "seeing what they want", your coming across like a religious nut who just happens to believe in "skepticism", you don't even seem to understand the basic princples of it .
Before the video was even released I said Mr. Tri could be lying or bizzarely hypnotized. I wouldn't have considered this test proof even if it had been videotaped in broad daylight with Mr. Tri holding a 12" bamboo stick awalking at a snails pace towards Serregen. Yet you called me a"stupid believer" . . .
thaiboxerken said:
I asked when do you think it "began", do you really think it didn't "begin"till after he completed the swing.
Yes, he toppled over after his lame-ass swing.
[/B]
I was just giving you a chance to back out in case you missed the exact wording. Sort of like how I gave you a chance to say you were "pretty sure" instead of "100% sure" before.
thaiboxerken said:
Think of the implications of that. It would mean Mr. Tri would have to be a stooge who aimed for the dirt (if he wasn't a stooge he would have noticed serregen jumping out of the way) and then fell over. I can't say for sure what happend but that seems rather unlikely to me.
It is obvious to me.
[/B]
It's obvious to you that Mr. Tri was a stooge who aimed for the dirt completed his swing, and then fell over???
thaiboxerken said:
It is not normal for even an untrained person to fall while swinging a light pole. Your reasonable conlsuion that he could have plausibly caused his own fall goes aginst your other conclusion that he swung how an untrained person would swing.
Hardly, he is running, he is excited and he is untrained, it's very likely that he caused his own fall.
[/B]
According to you he falls after he has completed the swing anyways. Really he just kinds of flops over weirdly at that point, more like he fainted. It would be highly unusual for a person to fall at any time while swinging a light pole and the timing and nature of his fall isn't consistent with a "normal" fall either.
thaiboxerken said:
Certainly if you got enough people eventually you would see some pretty odd techniques but I do insist I don't think that movement is natural. For the record it's not like a body mechnaics expert or anything, are you though?
Yes.
[/B]
Typo on my part (you might have read it how I intended anyways but I thought I would clarify first). The 2nd sentence should have read, "For the record, it's not like
I'm a body mechanics expert or anything, are you though?
Is your answer "Yes" to that question?