• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

Re: Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

tamiO said:
It's a PR problem for the JREF whether they recognise it or not and an opportunity for commanding respect.

I don't see it that way at all. Don't forget that he cannot even take the challenge. Read the terms.

tamiO said:
It is the very reason Carlos will not simply allow the JREF and his detractors to make personal attacks and continue to libel him without replying to each and every post that he finds personal attacks and libel to defending himself.

You are being taken for a ride. You've been told this, but apparently, you don't want to listen. Oh, well.

tamiO said:
Both sides read things into the other sides posts. I think if we look at all the evidence, piece by piece, I firmly believe we can all come to an agreement and the forum can continue without this cloud hanging over us.

For those who took the time to read through the many pages - and threads - I believe we did come to a conclusion.
 
The Don said:
I'm sorry, why does there have to be a "diplomatic" solution ?

Surely the discussion could be carried out to everyone's satisfaction on other boards. Re-instating Carlos will IMO merely re-open the debate to no good purpose and serve to form a plaform from which Carlos can state that JREF was forced to come back to the table because of the power of his arguments.

There doesn't have to be a diplomatic solution, sorry if I implied that somehow, but I don't see it. It could be it is staring me in the face. Could you explain what made you think that? Did I use key words or phrases that you could show me so I can address it and maybe do better next time?

If the discussion could be carried out to my satisfaction on other boards, I am open to that. I will only be satisfied with KRAMERS or Mr. Randi's reply to the quest for closure to the issue.

I chose this one because this is an issue between Carlos and KRAMER at the moment. KRAMER represents Mr. Randi in his OP. KRAMER opened the discussion, not me. KRAMER wants us to accept his word without looking at the evidence he feels supports the JREF's official position.

You don't have to participate in any diplomatic solution, you chose to click reply and engage in the discussion. No one is forcing anyone in this thread to be here except maybe Mr. Randi (he may have asked KRAMER to address these things.)

There are many things mentioned in the opening post that lead me to believe KRAMER was following Mr. Randi's requests by opening a thread and offering an explanation.

I will hang up now and listen to KRAMERS answer.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

tamiO said:

It's a PR problem for the JREF whether they recognise it or not and an opportunity for commanding respect.

I do not think it is a PR problem. The people who hate JREF will continue to do so, and any peaceful solution will be ignored or interpreted as a total defeat for JREF. And the only respect that JREF will get will be from its supporters.
 
tamiO said:
KRAMER wants us to accept his word without looking at the evidence he feels supports the JREF's official position.

This doesn't make any sense, tami. What claim has KRAMER made that requires some sort of validation? I'm reading through his entire opening post twice already - I don't see what you're asking for clarification on.
 
Joshua Korosi said:
Since he's been throwing a tantrum for some time now, my advice also is to just scan and post the darn thing so he will stop. What harm could it do?

Exactly. It will only show the JREF in a good light. Why miss that opportunity?

If an organisation were to scan each document along the way, there would be tons of content on this site that would benefit the JREF.

Or. The JREF could just choose to dismiss the request with full awareness that Carlos will continue to tell everyone he meets negative things about the JREF and skepticism. He will be able to say the JREF is cowardly.

I don't know about you, but the JREF could use some good PR for a change.
The upcoming purge will remove all forum references to Carlos and his paranormal hat. They will live on in archives, but it's not the same.

The upcoming purge will also mean that Carlos will definitely be spreading negative opinions of the JREF to everyone he meets and there will be no more valid evidence of his rude behavior and subsequent obsession to smear Mr. Randi's name, the JREF and all things skeptical. The people will only be able to go by Carlos' polite posts and gracious manner.

If the JREF would work towards closure on this to the satisfaction of both Mr. Randi and Carlos, I do believe Carlos is a kind of man that will agree to disagree and move on.

He feels he has not been given a fair chance from the start.

Mr. Randi allowed prejudice to color his response to Carlos
either that or
Mr. Randi did not call him names when Carlos contacted the JREF asking about his application.

There could be better reasons than, for example, KRAMER said so, Mr. Randi said so and KRAMER passed it on or that Carlos can upload images, too.
Do you agree or disagree?

If there are, do you have any objections to the idea that the JREF scan all the letters, reprint things and help their image in the process?

Make an example case of the Carlo Swett Affair as content for the new JREF site to show the process people go through when submitting an application. This case could example a person who applies, but is dismissed in the preliminary examination of the evidence by Andrew Harter blah blah blah. It's a notable enough case to earn a name the way military officers name wars, battles and strategic maneuvers.

You could also do an in depth look into the famous Russian girl. Work backwards looking for cases that ended up being notable for some reason or another. Keep an eye on current such cases and be documenting better or looking toward the future by planning a system of receiving, documenting and presenting more cases for the viewers to read about.

If not, maybe another site will. It's all up to the JREF. The ball is in KRAMERS court.
 
Joshua Korosi said:


This doesn't make any sense, tami. What claim has KRAMER made that requires some sort of validation? I'm reading through his entire opening post twice already - I don't see what you're asking for clarification on.

KRAMER said:
I believe that he (Carlos) has posted this letter on many alternate forums, so I will not re-print it here, as I have clearly stated the crux of its' contents.

KRAMER tells us there is no need for him to reprint the letter he is referring to because he would like us to believe that he has told us the crux of the contents; the critical point or feature of the letter.

I feel that KRAMERS perspective and Carlos' perspective are one of the cruces of the issue.

I am not sure what KRAMER refers to when he says reprint.

  • Carlos has given permission.
  • KRAMER has given permission.
  • KRAMER is able to share with us a facsimile the letter in it's entirety

The ball is on KRAMER's court.
KRAMER can:
  • ignore my request, reply and refuse,
  • reply and negotiate further
  • reply and reprint the letter

I am only making a suggestion. I hope I have made a strong enough case for reprinting. If I haven't, I will be satisfied I did everything I felt I should do and accept that.

I cannot speak for Carlos as to whether he will accept and move on if KRAMER chooses to ignore this request. I have my doubts that he will be able to move on. He feels his family name has been dishonored and his duty is to restore that honor.

Sure, there will be other cases like this, some even more ridiculous. That is not invalidate anything I have suggested.
Addressing this one case should not and will not, IMO, obligate the JREF to go this extra mile every time.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

steenkh said:


And the only respect that JREF will get will be from its supporters.

It has recently suffered in that department, so this supports my suggestion, IMO.

Ok, if that's all I am hanging up now. I see each post that pops up before I get away as a "wait wait, don't hang up yet."
 
KRAMER said:
"Do it anyway!" was Randi's final comment on the matter.
Say what you like about Carlos; a person in charge who makes statements like Randi's deserves all the backlash he gets.
 
Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

Beleth said:
Say what you like about Carlos; a person in charge who makes statements like Randi's deserves all the backlash he gets.

Really? To me, it shows that no matter if the prospects of getting a reply is extremely slim, JREF still does all it can to reach the people wanting to win the million bucks.
 
Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

CFLarsen said:
Really? To me, it shows that no matter if the prospects of getting a reply is extremely slim, JREF still does all it can to reach the people wanting to win the million bucks.
...unless it's Carlos. If it's Carlos, then sending the letter is considered a mistake. That Randi rubber-stamped the letter to go through shows carelessness on his part. Carelessness is not an attribute I find endearing.
 
I just sent this PM to KRAMER:

Hi KRAMER,

I have told Carlos I will help him understand the JREF's position and I was hoping that you could send me a copy of the letter that you sent to Carlos. I would really prefer you to just post the copy on the forum in your thread.

He is really a nice man that has gotten caught up in a viscious circle. I have gotten him to see it your way, but he feels that you have lied and that you are a coward and will never how the entire letter! I don't know what made him think this, but I have the problem it's that language thing again.

There is probably nothing in the letter that you meant to confuse him with. He is easily confused with language barrier and together we can help Carlos see things from the JREF's perspective, I am sure of it.

Thanks in advance,

- tami
 
Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

CFLarsen said:


Really? To me, it shows that no matter if the prospects of getting a reply is extremely slim, JREF still does all it can to reach the people wanting to win the million bucks.

So what's so hard about reprinting the letter? Please, let's give Jeff some time to answer. He may not even log in every day :eek: I'm sure he will check back in the thread soon.

In the meantime let's argue about something. NOT. :mad:
 
Wow. TamiO, there is so much that you cannot seem to see clearly, I just don't even know where to begin. And even if I do find a start place, I know that I can never finish satisfactorily (in your mind).

But, I will try to assist forum members by making some points in response to some of these comments regarding Mr. Carlos Swett.

Firstly, why doesn't Swett post a "scan" of the letter? May I ask...WHY wouldn't he want to do just that? And indeed, the forum member who stated that Carlos can post a private letter sent to him is quite correct, stating additionally that it would be wrong for JREF to do so without written permission from him.

And JREF has still received no reply or communications of any kind from Carlos as regards this issue. He has taken it up entirely in alternate forums, and has steered clear of us. I guess he's satisfied to stir things up elsewhere, and observe the troubles he's caused herein from a distance, through 3rd parties, such as yourself, TamiO. How very sad for you to be played like a fiddle.

And on that issue, I must confess that I deeply regret to see that you have been employed by him as a minor pawn in his game, and I sincerely hope that you will soon reconsider your position of support for him. Not that I am hoping you will change camps and support JREF - I'm just hoping that you soon realize that you are supporting a man who has dedicated his life to chasing chimeras, and that by doing so, you do yourself (and the "sport" of rational inquiry itself) a most grave injustice.

I have also been told by several concerned parties that Carlos himself has posted my letter to him in its entirety elsewhere on the web. If that's true, will TamiO be satisfied with that? Hmmm...
I just don't feel compelled either personally or as a JREF associate to do anything other than what I am doing about all of this. The letter I wrote to Carlos has been posted. I am not resisting any requests. I am simply avoiding the blind acceptance of the utterly useless ones. But if Carlos contacts me and grants me written permission to do so, I will gladly do so. But he won't.

More to TamiO: Regarding your statement that JREF should be terribly concerned with how "cowardly" we seem in this matter,
well, what can I say. Thousands of self-deluded individuals spread "negative opinions about JREF" every day. Some apparently have even chosen to do it all day long, rather than finding something decent and constructive to do with their lives.
It is not JREF's job to put the efforts TamiO seems to require into protecting our reputation, or into attempting to prevent the inevitable and numerous attacks we receive here daily. People will talk. Some people will talk ◊◊◊◊. Some people are just born that way. Again, the innate within us all. We can do nothing to stop it. It will continue "ad infinitum", as the old scholars put it.

Another statement of TamiO's that amuses me greatly is this:
"Carlos is the kind of man who would agree to disagree, and move on". TamiO, do your homework. Do some research into the past. You are incredibly wrong on this point, and even a modicum of homework on your part will show you how very wrong you are. Carlos will never stop, and it has absolutely nothing to do with his so-called "family honor", of which JREF is entirely unconcerned, being not in any way within our sphere of inquiry, which anyone even tacitly familiar with JREF and its goals should be well aware. We investigate allegedly paranormal phenomenon, and we offer a One Million Dollar Prize to anyone who can demonstrate proof of such phenomenon, provided the applicant and JREF can devise a mutually agreeable and scientific test protocol.

TamiO claims that JREF has neglected to abide by its' duties and give Carlos Swett "a fair chance". A fair chance? To do what? What are you referring to? A fair chance to prove his claim?

I think we have indeed done just that, and I think that any reasonable individual who examines the situation would quickly come to agreement with us on that point.

As regards Carlos' claim, well, it was easily seen that we had given him "a fair shot" to provide proof of his claim, but we agree(along with approximately one billion people around the globe) that the 9-11 attacks had nothing whatsoever to do with UFO's, but sprang forth rather from the workings of irrational minds driven by religious zealotry and an innate indifference to the value of each and every human life. A similar religious zealotry in Carlos' home country, such as you have described in in some of your postings, have indeed given rise to a culture in which people with claims such as Carlos' can gain a wide audience. It is indeed sad that we do not have offices in Central America, as I believe we could do some good there, and maybe even save some lives. Perhaps that is hubris on my part, but I would like to think that saving lives is a quantifiable part of our goals here. Human arrogance? Or humanism? I think the latter, for humanity itself is the very root of our most basic concerns here at JREF.

The origin of the events that Carlos seems so insistent upon proving came from outer space, came in fact from inner-space, and will forever remain one of the saddest examples of mankind at its' very worst. Perhaps Carlos can neither envision nor accept any explanation that places the responsibility for those atrocious acts squarely within the seat of humanity or any groups or any individual members of the human race. I can understand that.
I am sure that many of us have, at least briefly, shared this kind of disbelief following 911, though most of us eventually came to accept the sad facts, such as they presently appear. I only wish it were UFO's. That would be a lot easier to deal with - maybe.

TamiO also suggests that JREF has libeled Mr. Swett. May I ask her for a clairification of that accusation? Wherein has Mr. Swett been subjected to any form of libel from JREF? Are you familiar with the definition of the word? ..."to misrepresent damagingly".

I fail to see how such an accusation can stand up to even the most cursory examination of real events. Wherein have we misrepresented anything? Wherein have we lied?

Mr. Swett's rantings are no problem for JREF itself, though I acknowledge the fact that it is surely a problem within the JREF forums. Every day I regret more and more the can of worms I have unwittingly opened.

TamiO also said, "I would like it if people refrained from adding their opinions"...

Well, I don't think that TamiO is ever going to be happy here in the JREF forums, 'cuz that wish will never come true, and I hope it never does. Carry on, forum members. And on that specific note...

Surely there are more important issues to discuss on these forums than the rantings of the self-deluded, and the support and defenses they might receive from the seemingly reasonable and rational? Indeed, can't we just MOVE ON?

I'm not in any way trying to avoid the issue at hand, or detract anyone from examining it to their satisfaction, but aren't we satisfied yet? TamiO has given ample evidence here that no reasonable confrontation of the facts will dissuade her from supporting Mr. Swett, and by proxy, whether she realizes it or not, in supporting his "claim".

Am I wrong, TamiO? If so, prove it!

I don't think that there is anything I can say or do that will satisfy TamiO, and I agree with previous postings that suggest that Mr. Swett will find a new issue to pursue if I do indeed scan his letter and post it here. But he has laready posted it elsewhere in its' entirely, so I believe this is a non-issue. I believe that this entire matter is entirely moot, to say the least.

The insistence by TamiO that we "scan" the letter in question and post in on the JREF website is another chimera designed to misdirect, originated not by her, but by Mr. Swett. That is pretty easy to decipher. I don't think that this request was TamiO's idea.

Nothing would make me happier than to soon see this attempt at misdirection fail with flying colours. I think that it's high time we turned our attention elsewhere. Mr. Swett has gone away once, and he will go away again, once he can find no more supporters with direct access to the kind hearts and inquiring minds of any and all rational persons herein. Without pawns, he will eventually sink into the marshes, and his noise will fade just as it has before, like a distant echo. As the sole instigator of this entire chain of events, well, the sooner the better. Shame on me.

Chimera; a "fancy" or a "dream".

It is now nearly 7pm, there is no one else still here at JREF, and I have spent the last hour composing this posting. With or without your kind permission, I am now going home to my family.
 
Carlos could have posted the letter--as he promised he would--over on SC

He has not!

He has created the atmosphere, he has created the rudeness, he is responsible for appearing the fool.

As apparently missed by his supporters, he has no actual claim--it has been debunked, demolished, cremated, crushed, and flushed.

He merely revels in the belief of his "injur'd merit"--some think being targets of mythic conspiracies make them important.

Some feel championing mythical victims of mythical conspiracies makes them virtuous.

--J.D.
 
Re: Re: Re: In CONCLUSION of the Carlos Swett Affair

Aardvark_DK said:

And Carlos wouldn't just claim that that was a complete fabrication and that he never received such a letter? No, of course he wouldn't.

He has the actual letter and the envelope it came in, I presume. He would just need to find a way to convince us of it's authenticity. This may involve third parties, cheese parties and barbecues. I don't think we need to think about that right now. If it comes to that it will be because the JREF refused to post a copy for us to compare it with what Carlos received.
 
Doctor X said:

He has created the atmosphere, he has created the rudeness, he is responsible for appearing the fool.

As apparently missed by his supporters, he has no actual claim--it has been debunked, demolished, cremated, crushed, and flushed.

He merely revels in the belief of his "injur'd merit"--some think being targets of mythic conspiracies make them important.


We are all actors in this play.
We call this the Swett Sox Puppet Show
Welcome to the James Randi Community Theatre.
You would make a great narrator/commentator like the host of the twilight zone. Only different.
Oh wait.
You are.
 
KRAMER said:
Wow. TamiO,

Wow, yourself. :eek:

edited to add:

KRAMER said:
But if Carlos contacts me and grants me written permission to do so, I will gladly do so. But he won't.

Great! I didn't see this before. You gotta admit you buried the answer in a lot of unnecssary ranting and raving. It's no wonder I didn't see it.

I will let Carlos know the conditions and get back with you.

<hr><hr><hr>

Here is what I said before I found your concession:

I am satisfied. Thank you.
See how easy that was?

You really only had to say. "the JREF sees no logical reason why it should post a copy of the letter, Case Closed."
Or something to that effect. I was hoping the JREF wouldn't miss another opportunity to look good. Although I will admit... I didn't have that much hope left.

On the bright side, you have just saved me a lot of time by being blunt. I have done what I could for Carlos, I don't think I can do anything more.

Again, thank you for your time, and your consideration.
 

Back
Top Bottom