• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hillary Herds Reporters With Rope

16.5 said:
Are you talking about the republickers? Or the dummycraps?

Because we were talking about the demonrat party's relationship with big corporate interests, and it turns out the Dumpocrap party's relationship with corporate interests is just about as close as the republickers.

Dingdongdumbcrats or republickers, two sides of the same coin!

This satiric post is brought to you by the Tootsie Pop Corporation.
Click to expand...

Now THAT'S critical thinking.
 
thaiboxerken said:
Perhaps.

However, the Democrats are, at least, ashamed of it. They only go to the corporations for funds because they have to if they want to compete with the Republicons.
Click to expand...

Hmmm, that would suggest that the dummycrat party is hypocritical, unlike the Republickers party.

Thoughts?
 
Last edited:
thaiboxerken said:
Perhaps.

However, the Democrats are, at least, ashamed of it. They only go to the corporations for funds because they have to if they want to compete with the Republicons.
Click to expand...

Really?
Has Hollywood given up on them? Unions?

The dems have just as much as repubs. Remember Hillary's going to have the first billion dollar campaign.
 
thaiboxerken said:
However, the Democrats are, at least, ashamed of it. They only go to the corporations for funds because they have to if they want to compete with the Republicons.
Click to expand...
This is nonsense. The Reps could equally say they only go to the well because the Dems do it. Also, I know of no Dem saying they were ashamed of their *** kissing.

I gotta go with 16.5 here; it's a horrible mess across the political spectrum. Nobody has clean hands such that they can point fingers here.
 
16.5 said:
Are you talking about the republickers? Or the dummycraps?

Because we were talking about the demonrat party's relationship with big corporate interests, and it turns out the Dumpocrap party's relationship with corporate interests is just about as close as the republickers.

Dingdongdumbcrats or republickers, two sides of the same coin!

This satiric post is brought to you by the Tootsie Pop Corporation.
Click to expand...
Did Randi sell the forum to a 5th grader?
 
logger said:
Really?
Has Hollywood given up on them? Unions?

The dems have just as much as repubs. Remember Hillary's going to have the first billion dollar campaign.
Click to expand...

Unions are corporations? Actors are corporations?
 
SezMe said:
This is nonsense. The Reps could equally say they only go to the well because the Dems do it. Also, I know of no Dem saying they were ashamed of their *** kissing.

I gotta go with 16.5 here; it's a horrible mess across the political spectrum. Nobody has clean hands such that they can point fingers here.
Click to expand...

Conservatives dug the well with citizens united. This mess is their doing.
 
16.5 said:
Curious, you missed a couple of Republickers there.

Curious.
Click to expand...

With no offence, your (I do you the courtesy of assuming those were off the top of your head, not thought out over time) democrat namings were easy but not best thought out. Remember I did the republicker thing because after a very long time the republickers started calling us the Democrat party instead of the Democratic Party (our correct name). I am simply taking a leaf or many from the republicker playbook - but your guys went there first. Not to mention that in the late 70s they quit being what they had been and went to the vileness/offensiveness of joining with first the far right xtians and then the tax/right wing nutters of the artificially created tea partiers and their ilk. There is more, but the republicker party has not been the actual Republican party for 35 years now - roughly half my life.
 
Note: guess why I make so much nasty about tea baggers.... Their signs show why : Hands off my medicare and Cut Taxes NOW, Don't touch our Social Security! and Ax the Tax!!! . Also note - for the baggers, they chose that name. When they realized they had been stupid they tried to change it. Won't fly, idiots/incompetent tools get what they earned!!!
 
The fundamental issue for the Repiblican party is that Hilary Clinton could be guilty of everything they accuse her of and she would still make a better President than any of the potential candidates they've managed to scrape up to date.
 
Garrison said:
The fundamental issue for the Repiblican party is that Hilary Clinton could be guilty of everything they accuse her of and she would still make a better President than any of the potential candidates they've managed to scrape up to date.
Click to expand...

and, there's that!!!!
 
Darat said:
I keep finding myself reading these threads which are meant to be demonstrating that she has done something bad and not understanding what she is meant to have done that is bad or wrong or otherwise negative.

In this case what is it that she (or rather I'm assuming her team) is meant to have done that is bad/wrong/negative?
Click to expand...
This. Some USAians seem determined to find something to blame HC in anything she does.
 
Garrison said:
The fundamental issue for the Repiblican party is that Hilary Clinton could be guilty of everything they accuse her of and she would still make a better President than any of the potential candidates they've managed to scrape up to date.
Click to expand...

For me, this seems to summarize the thread, without any resort to childish name calling. Surely, you can work on that aspect in the future. :D
 
How curious. Trump has a journalist thrown out of a press conference, yet there's no thread protesting about it from the usual suspects.
It's almost like there was a double standard or something.
 
catsmate said:
How curious. Trump has a journalist thrown out of a press conference, yet there's no thread protesting about it from the usual suspects.
It's almost like there was a double standard or something.
Click to expand...

I just finally watched that clip. Since I started this thread (and pretty much abandoned it deciding it was trivial and that I shouldn't have started it), I guess you are referring to me.

Ramos wouldn't shut up. He was given plenty of time to ask questions and interrupt. He basically had a 4.5 minute conversation with Trump. He babbled on and on as Trump was speaking - perhaps he didn't feel that his questions were being answered, but most reporters don't interrupt for the entire time the speaker is talking. For me, it was extremely annoying.

Trump allowed it to go on for a longer period than I can remember any other politician doing. Usually a person is allowed a question, then a follow up question. He wasn't just asking questions, he was argumentative.

He even interrupted other people as they tried to answer questions. He was being an ass and Trump had him removed after asking him to stop many times. I have no problem with that.
 
I think the Ramos thing isn't really news. Ramos was rude. . It''s about as significant as the Hillary story this OP is about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom