Hillary Herds Reporters With Rope

I keep finding myself reading these threads which are meant to be demonstrating that she has done something bad and not understanding what she is meant to have done that is bad or wrong or otherwise negative.

In this case what is it that she (or rather I'm assuming her team) is meant to have done that is bad/wrong/negative?
 
Denver said:
Oh oh - someone's bubble is about to get popped.
Click to expand...

Same as the last time that she went several weeks without addressing the Nation, she incompetently took a few questions, gave non-responsive answers and went back into her shell.

People start pointing out that she is Bubble Woman again, her staff goes into crisis mode, slap some lipstick on the pig and she toddles off to an exclusive one on one with an anointed reporter.

Rinse, repeat, and the fans go wild, not noticing that Hillary's inability to communicate is getting worse and worse every election cycle. Shes been surrounded by fawning sycophants for so long, it seems like her "human" mode is broken.
 
16.5 said:
Same as the last time that she went several weeks without addressing the Nation, she incompetently took a few questions, gave non-responsive answers and went back into her shell.

People start pointing out that she is Bubble Woman again, her staff goes into crisis mode, slap some lipstick on the pig and she toddles off to an exclusive one on one with an anointed reporter.

Rinse, repeat, and the fans go wild, not noticing that Hillary's inability to communicate is getting worse and worse every election cycle. Shes been surrounded by fawning sycophants for so long, it seems like her "human" mode is broken.
Click to expand...

"People"??

WHO?
 
Darat said:
I keep finding myself reading these threads which are meant to be demonstrating that she has done something bad and not understanding what she is meant to have done that is bad or wrong or otherwise negative.

In this case what is it that she (or rather I'm assuming her team) is meant to have done that is bad/wrong/negative?
Click to expand...

If I may chime in …

Early on, many stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans have found it difficult to criticize Obama because they were afraid of being publicly labeled as being racists, even though they were privately quite racist. So what they did was say crazy things like ‘Obama is Muslim’, ‘Obama is not a Christian’, ‘Obama was born in Kenya’, ‘Obama is a liar’, and so on.

Now, one is seeing a similar pattern with Hillary.

Accordingly, many of these same stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans pretend to hate Hillary for ‘Benghazi’, ‘having a private e-mail server’, or ‘poor handling of the press’ but the real reason they hate her is because she is a woman who actually has a good chance of actually becoming the President.
 
Darat said:
I keep finding myself reading these threads which are meant to be demonstrating that she has done something bad and not understanding what she is meant to have done that is bad or wrong or otherwise negative.

In this case what is it that she (or rather I'm assuming her team) is meant to have done that is bad/wrong/negative?
Click to expand...

after several weeks of avoiding the press, her staff used a rope to physically corral the press in order to “physically block journalists from getting too close to the candidate,” according to The Washington Post. The journalists were kept “mostly out of earshot of Clinton’s interactions in this rural, working-class community.”

She came out looking weak, ineffectual and out of touch, not to say terrified of the press. Now three months after announcing, she is sitting down for a one on one, while Bernie Sanders is playing the press like a fiddle.

She is running an aloof campaign, and is getting pilloried for it, by the press by her opponents and now her own staff.
 
Crossbow said:
Accordingly, many of these same stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans pretend to hate Hillary for ‘Benghazi’, ‘having a private e-mail server’, or ‘poor handling of the press’ but the real reason they hate her is because she is a woman who actually has a good chance of actually becoming the President.
Click to expand...

Exactly. They can't attack her on her policy proposals and real issues, so they are fabricating scandals. It's really pathetic.
 
Darat said:
I keep finding myself reading these threads which are meant to be demonstrating that she has done something bad and not understanding what she is meant to have done that is bad or wrong or otherwise negative.

In this case what is it that she (or rather I'm assuming her team) is meant to have done that is bad/wrong/negative?
Click to expand...

The GOP knows they are going to have an uphill battle against Hillary, and at this point it is her race to lose. So strategically, it makes a lot of sense for GOP candidates to be going full-out already this far ahead of the election. They need to raise funds; in fact they need to COMPETE for funds; and they need to find talking points that resonate with the voters better than Hillary's.

And I think it makes sense for Hillary not to be going full-out yet. There is plenty of time still; and her funds will be better used once the opponent field is smaller and her points of weakness and vulnerability have been found by her opponents. And I mean the weaknesses and vulnerabilities that are verified by public opinion, not the ones that pop after a couple weeks of frenzy.

So it's not that she's really done anything wrong in her campaigning. It's that the GOP candidates are proceeding in their campaigning differently than Hillary is. And a good talking point for the GOP has always been that different equals bad. Plus, by not speaking more, it doesn't give the GOP the handholds they need to raise issues and compete for funds.

But it's all pretty silly, as if anyone will remember corralgate in a year. Or in a month.
 
Crossbow said:
Accordingly, many of these same stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans pretend to hate Hillary for ‘Benghazi’, ‘having a private e-mail server’, or ‘poor handling of the press’ but the real reason they hate her is because she is a woman who actually has a good chance of actually becoming the President.
Click to expand...

July 2015: and the "sexism" card gets dealt. Utter failure.

By "stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans." You know, the ones that run CNN and WaPo.

:D:D
 
16.5 said:
after several weeks of avoiding the press, her staff used a rope to physically corral the press in order to “physically block journalists from getting too close to the candidate,” according to The Washington Post. The journalists were kept “mostly out of earshot of Clinton’s interactions in this rural, working-class community.”
Click to expand...

I'm still wondering what's wrong with that. She was marching in a small town parade. They used a rope to keep reporters from swarming her.


She came out looking weak, ineffectual and out of touch, not to say terrified of the press. Now three months after announcing, she is sitting down for a one on one, while Bernie Sanders is playing the press like a fiddle.
Click to expand...

Weak, ineffectual, out of touch and terrified is in the eye of the beholder. If, for instance, you're someone who starting blaming the administration for Americans being killed by terrorists only after a Democrat became president, then you might also think all these ridiculous things about Clinton.
 
The hilarious thing is that it is not the boogey man "Republicans" who are calling her out on her Bubble Ways, it is the press.

It is not the "Republicans" she is worried about to cause her to dip her toes outside the bubble, it is Bernie Sanders.

"stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans." What passes for reasoned discussion from the Hillary Camp around here, what a laugh.
 
16.5 said:
The hilarious thing is that it is not the boogey man "Republicans" who are calling her out on her Bubble Ways, it is the press.
Click to expand...

Yeah. The press. So what? That was already explained to you. They sell content, and Clinton stories sell.


It is not the "Republicans" she is worried about to cause her to dip her toes outside the bubble, it is Bernie Sanders.
Click to expand...

If the threat from Bernie causes Clinton to change her campaign tactics, there's nothing wrong with that. I won't mind. I was never happy with her alleged invincibility. But I'm pretty sure that whatever he campaign does, it won't make the press love her for who she is.
 
:covereyes
thaiboxerken said:
16.5 it's not even a top 10 story today.
Click to expand...

Yet, her people keep posting in this thread and playing the "sexist" and "stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans" cards in a desperate and hilarious attempt to defend her, which are definitely Top Ten in my book of hilarity!
 
16.5 said:
:covereyes

Yet, her people keep posting in this thread and playing the "sexist" and "stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans" cards in a desperate and hilarious attempt to defend her, which are definitely Top Ten in my book of hilarity!
Click to expand...

As a wise man once said "you can fool some of the people all of the time".
 
16.5 said:
:covereyes

Yet, her people keep posting in this thread and playing the "sexist" and "stupid, idiotic, lying Republicans" cards in a desperate and hilarious attempt to defend her, which are definitely Top Ten in my book of hilarity!
Click to expand...

What the heck does that have to do with the news?! Your attempt to be clever has backfired.
 
thaiboxerken said:
What the heck does that have to do with the news?! Your attempt to be clever has backfired.
Click to expand...

what the heck does the Top Ten items in today's news have to do with Hillary's Bubble?

Answer, nothing.

By the way, here is a protip: I am not actually forcing you or anyone else to post. Thanks, tho, for posting, I needed a hearty chuckle and few things deliver more than the "sexism" card, boldly played.:thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom