• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Good Pick for EPA

Fudbucker

Philosopher
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
8,537
It was always foolish to think we were going to solve climate change by reducing emissions. The Paris agreement was a non-binding joke, and we're already projected to sail through the two degrees of warming everyone has warned against. We might as well get as much out of the ground as possible, and use some of the money to fund a longshot R&D effort, either for carbon sequestration and/or geo-engineering.
 
Well, according to NatGeo channel, we're already colonizing Mars, so we can continue to **** up this planet with impunity, just as the Good Lord intended.
 
The new waste stream process: sewer everything. Well, only human waste needs to go to water treatment. Cause that would be gross and costly.
 
It was always foolish to think we were going to solve climate change by reducing emissions. The Paris agreement was a non-binding joke, and we're already projected to sail through the two degrees of warming everyone has warned against. We might as well get as much out of the ground as possible, and use some of the money to fund a longshot R&D effort, either for carbon sequestration and/or geo-engineering.

The EPA has responsibilities way beyond -- and more immediate -- than global warming. It was created in response to many decades of air and water pollution by industries that could pretty much dump anything anywhere. You wanna go back to that?
 
The EPA has responsibilities way beyond -- and more immediate -- than global warming. It was created in response to many decades of air and water pollution by industries that could pretty much dump anything anywhere. You wanna go back to that?

You don't have to deal with them like I do, they're very special individuals. The whole department should be eliminated. Thanks Nixon, you *******.
 
The EPA has responsibilities way beyond -- and more immediate -- than global warming. It was created in response to many decades of air and water pollution by industries that could pretty much dump anything anywhere. You wanna go back to that?

I know, I was being a little tongue-in-cheek.
 
You don't have to deal with them like I do, they're very special individuals. The whole department should be eliminated. Thanks Nixon, you *******.
Maybe you need a safe space from those meanies. Might I suggest the Siberian Tiaga?
 
What, you can't crop down every tree? AWWW.

I don't "crop" down trees and no if every tree was cut down there would be none left, did you realize that?
Did you also realize the EPA is for managing timber, its all their other ridiculous rules and ideas.
 
Maybe you need a safe space from those meanies. Might I suggest the Siberian Tiaga?
I don't know a single person on the right who needs or wants a "safe space", that was completely invented by the loser cowards on the left. ;)
 
I don't know a single person on the right who needs or wants a "safe space", that was completely invented by the loser cowards on the left. ;)
How about all those college cowards whining about exposure to ideas contrary to their conservative upbringings? All that science and stuff. Safe spaces ****. These cowards and their parents want them everywhere. Schools, textbooks, gummit . . . you really should get out more.
 
Last edited:
And when the Cuyahoga River catches fire again, we can all toast marshmallows. What fun!




In the pre-internet days, it was "Nuke the unborn baby seals."

I remember "Nuke the gay whales for Christ!" and as a little kid, it confused and disturbed me. Now I think it's hilarious.
 

Back
Top Bottom