• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Going Down

Gravy

Downsitting Citizen
Gravy
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
17,078
Here's a brief video rebuttal to the boneheads who claim that airliners can't fly fast and low. The people who say that about flight 77 are missing the point anyway: that plane descended and crashed, which any plane can do, and it was only at an altitude where ground effect would come into play for a second or two. Even if ground effect had paranormal pillowy powers, flight 77 still would have hit the Pentagon. So why did I bother making this? Because I like planes. Beachnut should get a kick out of the first one.

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE
 
Excellent compilation, Gravy:)

Yeah, there is such a thing s ground effect, but its effect on an airliner going over 500mph is virtually non-existent, especially when you look at what the real forces involved were.
 
Just freaking awesome!

ETA: You do realise this video proves AA77 didn't hit the Pentagon? Non of the planes in it crashes. Tada!
 
Last edited:
There are some pretty cool fly bys in there. The last one is insane. As mancman said though it must have taken forever to digitally put all those planes in those videos. Nice work though getting everyone on lunch break from NWO HQ out there to be "witnesses". I assume you gave out free beverages as incentives?
 
Some Very nice fly-bys there, that A310 is wunnerful, having had the pleasure of working at Heathrow (and living a gnats chuff away from the Perimeter fence) I have witnessed a couple of Go arounds by 310s 767s and even the odd 747 which is a little off putting to say the least.

I also used to spend a Lot of time in North Wales, never ever go climbing while some maniac RAF/Navy pilot practises NOE flying in a Harrier or Tornado, never mind scaring the Sheep it made me make currants.
 
Great job, Gravy!

Although I assure you that if any of those planes had gone a couple inches lower the ground effect would have tossed them skyward. :rolleyes:
 
After my disappointment in the disconnect between the thread's title and my expectations of the content, this is awesome. I have never seen jet airliners fly that low, nor do I ever hope to have first-hand knowledge.

Great work.
 
Great video! You just proved that fly-by's at air shows are near take off and landing speeds not at 530 mphs.
Certainly low in altitude, but can you make another video with the plane a few feet off the deck traveling at 530 mph? Now that would be some work!
 
Swing Dangler said:
Great video! You just proved that fly-by's at air shows are near take off and landing speeds not at 530 mphs.
Certainly low in altitude, but can you make another video with the plane a few feet off the deck traveling at 530 mph? Now that would be some work!
Click to expand...

For how long did Flight 77 fly "a few feet off the deck?"
 
Swing Dangler said:
Great video! You just proved that fly-by's at air shows are near take off and landing speeds not at 530 mphs.
Certainly low in altitude, but can you make another video with the plane a few feet off the deck traveling at 530 mph? Now that would be some work!
Click to expand...

the tap airbus was doing 700 kph/434 mph.
 
I'd like to issue a challenge to the 9/11 truthers.

Step 1) In order to test the ground effect theory, a few truthers should get their 757 pilots' license.

2) Rent a 757.

3) Pack that 757 with truthers (Dylan, Jason, the Jones' brothers, Fetzer, Hoffman, Wood, Pilots for truth, AE911 etc)

4) Attempt to fly the 757 into a brick wall in the same way that Flight 77 allegedly was.

If the ground effect is enough to prevent the crash, you'll live; if not, you'll die.

Who's game?
 
CHF said:
I'd like to issue a challenge to the 9/11 truthers.

Step 1) In order to test the ground effect theory, a few truthers should get their 757 pilots' license.

2) Rent a 757.

3) Pack that 757 with truthers (Dylan, Jason, the Jones' brothers, Fetzer, Hoffman, Wood, Pilots for truth, AE911 etc)

4) Attempt to fly the 757 into a brick wall in the same way that Flight 77 allegedly was.

If the ground effect is enough to prevent the crash, you'll live; if not, you'll die.

Who's game?
Click to expand...

great idea!
 
Swing Dangler said:
[C]an you make another video with the plane a few feet off the deck traveling at 530 mph? Now that would be some work!
Click to expand...


Even if he were to make a second such video, presumably you’d simply demand a third.
 
CHF, I will gladly help them, I can divert some of beer tokens for rental fees.

Twoof for 9/11 Pilots.

If there is one thing I have learned from flight simulators, Crashing is the easy part, I can pretty much guarantee a low CEP as well,
 
What's the conclusion made out of them claiming ground effect? The conclusion is, they claim it's impossible for flight 77 to have hit the Pentagon? Then we come to the questions about DNA, eyewitnesses, debris and damage once again.

Swing, what is the point you are trying to make? Or do you just argue every point out of habit?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom