Add me to the long list of people who don't know how to communicate sarcasm or humor on the internet. Sorry - I'm perhaps too familiar with these conspiracy nuts and forget that most people don't know who they are.
Sarcasm does not transmit in plain text. Can't argue there.
[*]I was being sarcastic - I do not believe that this Maxwell person sold our President his latest bride.
I don't recall you posting anything to that effect. At worst, the FLOTUS hooked up with Trump in a failed career move and now she is kinda stuck in place. At best, Maxwell might have made introductions, but who cares. Melanie is now stuck wit the consequences of her choices. But she is and was entitled to make whatever choices she wanted. She was in no way some sort of child bride. She was a grown adult.
Again, no argument there.
[*]Yes, Rick Wiles is an anti-semitic conspiracy theorist who should not be taken seriously. TruNews is so bad that they were
banned from Youtube.
Wlies is one slimy character.
No argument there.
[*]I'm
not the only one concerned that anti-semitic conspiracy theorists get press credentials under this White House. shemp's cat is fine.
Sure. WH press credentials are doled out on the basis of how much one can fawn over Trumpty-Dumpty. Once again, not a controversial claim.
So where is the beef? Where is the kernel of whatever imagined argument is here?
[above links from Haaretz.com]
Haaretz has a bias on many issues. Not this one. This is too ubiquitous across all media.
In short, I see you defending yourself against.......well, I am not sure what you are defending against. Myself, I consider your points spot on, in this particular post.
It could be, I suppose, that you have posted other things on other threads that some have taken exception to, I don't know unless such are drawn to my attention. Any such posts would constitute what is called here a "body of work".
Does such a "body of work" actually exist? Perhaps. I have not read all of your posts. Of those I have read, some of them, well they give me pause to consider potential underlying motivation.
Fixing that would be as simple as removing ambiguity.