There are laws which are blatantly unconstitutional which are on the books but never used. Relics from bygone eras.The 17 strangest laws in America.
Now I find it hard to believe that a self-professed atheist is barred, in Texas and some other states, from running for office, so somebody might be able to debunk that one. If true it's a hideous restriction on personal freedom that the USA should be mightily ashamed of.
![]()
Guardian has a few more details
I wouldn't quite say she's "totally to blame", and it seems the only politically palatable choice at the moment. Personally I probably would have told Edrogan to buzz off, but then I would have shot down the russian jets too, so I'm apparently feeling a little irritable this week ....![]()
Now I find it hard to believe that a self-professed atheist is barred, in Texas and some other states, from running for office, so somebody might be able to debunk that one. If true it's a hideous restriction on personal freedom that the USA should be mightily ashamed of.
The 17 strangest laws in America.
Now I find it hard to believe that a self-professed atheist is barred, in Texas and some other states, from running for office, so somebody might be able to debunk that one. If true it's a hideous restriction on personal freedom that the USA should be mightily ashamed of.
![]()
The 17 strangest laws in America.
Now I find it hard to believe that a self-professed atheist is barred, in Texas and some other states, from running for office, so somebody might be able to debunk that one. If true it's a hideous restriction on personal freedom that the USA should be mightily ashamed of.
![]()
Those are bad laws. And if they were ever enforced, people actually got bought to trial by them, it would be very bad.
There, see how easy that was? It's ridiculous, the knee jerk defensiveness of some europeans when a bad law gets criticized. Just the whiff of an American criticising something in Europe or the uk brings out the usual suspects with their tu quoques.
p.s. The UK is in Europe, so no need to distinguish between them the way you did.
Flabbergasted that anybody is defending this stupid law, or Merkel's decision to enforce it.
In the US we have a number of stupid local laws which are never enforced, called "Dead Letter Laws" but what is going on with Germany is different.
Flabbergasted that anybody is defending this stupid law, or Merkel's decision to enforce it.
.
Was it illegal to insult politicians in the DDR? Why yes it was!Can I refer you back to the o/p? (Apologies somewhat, as I only see WildCat's posts in quoted form) :
"I'm not sure what personal rights can exist at all when a person can be prosecuted for insulting a politician.
This is reminiscent of the DDR. What next for Germany, bringing back the Stasi?
Hey, Brits and other Euros here have defended their speech laws on the basis that without them they would become fascist dictatorships again, or start stuffing Jews in the gas chambers again. Otherwise why the Holocaust denial laws and bans on the sale of Nazi paraphernalia?If Europe once again descends into fascism and/or totalitarianism it will be under the guise of protecting the "right" to not be offended. "
My highlighting. Your response just now was fairly modest and considered. OK. WC's o/p was an in-your-face drooling rage of irrationality and that's what some people are railing against.
p.s. The UK is in Europe, so no need to distinguish between them the way you did.
Some folks just don't like to have their flaws pointed out, at least not by Americans. Probably an inferiority complex.
Yes it does. However, this paragraph (103) from the criminal code is specifically about insults against a foreign head of state or government member; so the crime has a political dimension, and thus the German executive must also have an interest in the prosecution. As an analogy: there are several other crimes in German penal code (with a proper English word: Antragsdelikt) that only are prosecuted when the victim requests that prosecution go ahead.I can understand Germany has weird laws. I don't understand how a voted politician's opinion is relevant to whether person is prosecuted or not. Doesn't Germany have independent justice ?
An absolutely disgusting development:
I'm not sure what personal rights can exist at all when a person can be prosecuted for insulting a politician.
This is reminiscent of the DDR. What next for Germany, bringing back the Stasi?
If Europe once again descends into fascism and/or totalitarianism it will be under the guise of protecting the "right" to not be offended.
Already happening, f.e. a very well known old joker named Hallervorden came up with a song "Erdogan, sue me"
The 17 strangest laws in America.
Now I find it hard to believe that a self-professed atheist is barred, in Texas and some other states, from running for office, so somebody might be able to debunk that one. If true it's a hideous restriction on personal freedom that the USA should be mightily ashamed of.
; )