• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Flight 93

beachnut said:
The military pilot would first intercept the plane, then get it to follow. If that fails there are a few tricks to make the plane land in a 3 degree to 4 degree glide.
Click to expand...

Heck, if Tom Cruise could do it to a Russian Fighter, I'm sure anyone could! :D
 
beachnut said:
Which part do you have a problem with?

The passengers on 93 took down the plane by scaring the dolt terrorist into panic! Just like the terrorist 9/11 truth has no idea what is going on! The passengers on 93 were heroes, they figured out 9/11 in minutes, and the goats are 9/11 truth, 6 years and zero, zip, no clue.

The military pilot would first intercept the plane, then get it to follow. If that fails there are a few tricks to make the plane land in a 3 degree to 4 degree glide.
Click to expand...

I was responding to a preposterous assertion in the OP. If you have a problem with it, take it up with peteweaver.

Isn't it almost 7 years? :)

Yes, I think if the pilot were going to ever be considered a hero, he should at least try what you recommend.
 
Last edited:
Clippy said:
Can't think of any. And if they did, I wouldn't expect them to announce it, let alone be lauded as heros for it, as the OP stated. Do you think someone who had shot down flight 93 would be seen as a hero?
Click to expand...

It is the stated Policy of the US Government that should this type of attack occur again, lives in the air will be sacrificed for lives on the ground.
 
theauthor said:
So the claim now is that perhaps 100% of the plane was found. Where is it? Where is this 100 tons of material? How much is in Iron Mountain?
Click to expand...
Flight 93 impacted as seen in PA. The entire plane impacted and can be found in PA after impact. Small parts were carried on the wind as far as they would be expected to float, and larger parts stopped closer to the impact point. This is a high speed impact, it is what a high speed impact looks like. Only 9/11 truth lack the knowledge to know this! What is your excuse?

P200059-1.jpg

Another high speed impact
impact3.jpg

No shoot down!
And again.
impact5.jpg

High speed impact. Darn, you should have taken an accident investigation course and saved looking like you lack knowledge.
impact1.jpg

Why are you unable to understand 9/11? Why are you void of evidence? Why do lack knowledge on this subject like 9/11 truth?
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
The word fantasy does not mean what you think it means or you wouldn't continue with this HS.
Click to expand...

Will you please just admit that the assertion in the OP was preposterous? Then we can stop this game.
 
RedIbis said:
Apparently, plane crashes are not harmful to grass.
Click to expand...

How do you know? Do you have experience smoking your joint in the vicinity of a plane crash?

Please be civil and attack the argument. Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: LibraryLady
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RedIbis said:
Apparently, plane crashes are not harmful to grass.
Click to expand...
Apparently you have never been to an aircraft accident scene, and you lack knowledge on this topic, like the entire 9/11 truth movement. Your ignorance on this topic are noted and you can consider yourself a non expert on this area. If you take a course on aircraft accident investigation or understand reality, you could make a better statement. What was your point?
 
As theaauthor in his sheer genius pointed out, in real plane crashes 100% of the plane is found and in fake crashes 95% of the plane is found. So we can see that flight 93 better fits the profile of faked plane crashes.

And the clincher is that radiation testing in the 40s clearly proves that flight 93 was faked.
 
Red, Author: can you please provide some reasonable relevance to why you ask these questions about flight 93 to people on the internet?

If you want to know what UA did to flight 93, contact them. If you want to know why they couldn't find 95% of the plane, contact the people who handled the debris.

There is no inside job scenario that can be had with either of these two questions, which makes them completely irrelevant to the subject of this subforum.
 
Garb said:
Red, Author: can you please provide some reasonable relevance to why you ask these questions about flight 93 to people on the internet?

If you want to know what UA did to flight 93, contact them. If you want to know why they couldn't find 95% of the plane, contact the people who handled the debris.

There is no inside job scenario that can be had with either of these two questions, which makes them completely irrelevant to the subject of this subforum.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what provide relevance means, but if you wonder why I would ask questions about Flight 93, I just want to know how the grass around the rim of the crater remained unburned, considering a 100 ton commercial airliner supposedly disintigrated upon contact with this dirt.
 
Since I wasn't there to witness it, I would speculate that when flight 93 impacted, among other terrible things happening, it caused something of a cloud of dirt to be flung into the air around the impact site. The cloud of dirt effectively blanketed the grass such that the fire from the fireball couldn't reach it. It might also have extinguished any fire from fuel that spilled or sprayed onto the adjacent grass which then didn't have a chance to reignite.

/shrug
 
Reheat said:
Why don't you grab a shovel and go looking for the remaining % 5. If it has human remains in it will you be delighted and will it solve you JAQing?

This is a rhetorical question that needs no answer because I already know it. Have you ever searched for human remains or even aircraft parts after a high speed aircraft crash? I know you haven't or you wouldn't be asking such stupid questions. Yes, your question is stupid, pure and simple stoooopid.

When an aircraft is involved with a high speed collision with mother earth the aircraft remains are mostly little bitty pieces of scrap aluminum and other material much of which can not be identified. In many cases, a piece of the aircraft can not be distinguished from a rock or lumpy clay.

Human remains, well..... They are in little bitty pieces too some too small to identify as human parts, particularly if they are burned.

Having been in aviation for the greater part of my life, I have walked around aircraft wreckages. I've even searched for the body parts of friends. In one particular instances only a certain percentage of of the body weight of two aircrew has been recovered from a high speed crash site. The families requested that a search continue for a greater percentage of the body weight. In the total search, the largest piece of human parts found was a piece of jawbone.

Your suggestion that someone search for % 5 of a high speed crash debris is audacious at best, at worst it is disgusting.
Click to expand...

Thanks Reheat.
You've stated most eloquently and completely The Obvious.

Feel better, theauthor?
You now have your answer to your inane question. :talk038:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom