• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Executive Order vs Decree

funk de fino said:
No. It is not. I will bold the important part for you.



Not all will be, or even is, but all could be, depending on what land they own, how much, if it is fallow, if Chavez thinks it was stolen or not hundreds of years ago.
Click to expand...

you really should inform yourself.....

again a wrong statement.

Who decides about if Land was gained legally?
 
as soon a member of the American general populace will join the US Government, the EO's will apply to him/her.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
yes and i debunked that twist of yours.
Click to expand...

You have debunked nothing and I did not twist. Stop lying. You claimed that the supreme court could overturn something and I have already shown he is willing to ignore the supreme court.

DC said:
How should i know why he passed it?
did he lie when he claimed it to be a misstake?
Click to expand...

He passed it then? And it affected every citizen. Oh boy, dead end for you here DC.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you really should inform yourself.....

again a wrong statement.

Who decides about if Land was gained legally?
Click to expand...

I guess if you just say something it is true then? Please show me what is incorrect.

Does the land reform affect private landowners?
 
funk de fino said:
You have debunked nothing and I did not twist. Stop lying. You claimed that the supreme court could overturn something and I have already shown he is willing to ignore the supreme court.



He passed it then? And it affected every citizen. Oh boy, dead end for you here DC.
Click to expand...

you didnt show that.....

BeAChooser did quote:

''Even if the electoral council accepts the question as valid, even if the Supreme Court considers the question valid, even if they get 90 percent of the vote with their referendum, I will not resign,'' the president said.
Click to expand...

and that is not ignoring the CNE nor the SC....

the referendum was nonbinding
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you didnt show that.....
BeAChooser did quote:
and that is not ignoring the CNE nor the SC....
the referendum was nonbinding
Click to expand...

That was my picture with the quote on it, I posted it in another thread.

It is ignoring the SC and the electoral council and the people.

I thought he did everything for the good and for the wishes of the people?

Is he putting Term Limits to the vote in a referendum twice in one session?
 
Last edited:
funk de fino said:
I guess if you just say something it is true then? Please show me what is incorrect.

Does the land reform affect private landowners?
Click to expand...

1. No, you claimed "if Chavez thinks it was stolen or not hundreds of years ago."

back up with evidence that Chavez is the one deciding the former legallity of the land ownership.

2.yes
 
funk de fino said:
That was my picture with the quote on it, I posted it in another thread.

It is ignoring the SC and the electoral council and the people.

I thought he did everything for the good and for the wishes of the people?

Is he putting Term Limits to the vote in a referendum twice in one session?
Click to expand...

derail

want to debate it? open a thread about it.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
1. No, you claimed "if Chavez thinks it was stolen or not hundreds of years ago."

back up with evidence that Chavez is the one deciding the former legallity of the land ownership.
Click to expand...

Who decides? I note you ignored my other claims. Please tell me everything you said i had that was incorrect and that i should inform myself. So far you have picked out one thing from the later post.

DC said:
2.yes
Click to expand...

Landowners who are part of the general populace then?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
derail

want to debate it? open a thread about it.
Click to expand...

Did I post that quote, first in the other thread or not?

You wanted to talk about the constitution before but not now?

Is he putting Term Limits to the vote in a referendum twice in one session?
 
funk de fino said:
Who decides? I note you ignored my other claims. Please tell me everything you said i had that was incorrect and that i should inform myself. So far you have picked out one thing from the later post.



Landowners who are part of the general populace then?
Click to expand...

just backup that claim to begin with.

... if Chavez thinks it was stolen or not hundreds of years ago.
Click to expand...

aren't government employes part of the general populace?
 
Dictator Cheney said:
Derail reportet
Click to expand...

You started the discussion about the constitution and referendums so you started the derail. You quoted it directly at me and then you have avoided answering that question since.

I do not need to run rings around you because you manage yourself.

Run away, run away..........
 
funk de fino said:
You started the discussion about the constitution and referendums so you started the derail. You quoted it directly at me and then you have avoided answering that question since.

I do not need to run rings around you because you manage yourself.

Run away, run away..........
Click to expand...

i brought up a part of the Venezuelan Constitution that was directly linked to Decrees. I brought it up to debunk the claim that a decree cannot be overturned.

you then came with a "referendum" that was not linked to a decree, it had nothing to do with the decree. you brought it up and made also a false statement about it.

now you bring up even another off topic thing. the new Referendum , which also has nothing to do with decree.

you derail because your other claims got denbunked and your not mann enough to admit it.

pretty simple.
 
Dictator Cheney said:
you derail because your other claims got denbunked and your not mann enough to admit it.
Click to expand...

You have debunked nothing. You have just handwaved and tap danced amnd moved goalposts. You asked for something and I gave you it.

If you choose to handwave stuff and move the goalposts then feel free. The readers can see what has been posted. You even debunked yourself.

My objective here is achieved.
 
funk de fino said:
You have debunked nothing. You have just handwaved and tap danced amnd moved goalposts. You asked for something and I gave you it.

If you choose to handwave stuff and move the goalposts then feel free. The readers can see what has been posted. You even debunked yourself.

My objective here is achieved.
Click to expand...

you claimed stuff you had from unsourced blogs and from news articles, without giving details. at the begin you didnt even list the laws, nor was you ever able to point out a law and post its text in order to prove your claims.

Still you refuse to backup atleast one of your claims. you know your wrong about that claim, but you would not admit it.

you go then and try to derail the thread.

your unsourced unproven and debunked claims are noted. Let the Venezuelans have their way of governing. They atleast have a proper written constitution and no unelected Monarch.

The Venezuelan people have more Democratic tools at hand than you have in your Monarchy.

God shave the Queen
 
when the mods dont react to your derail, i will also bring up totaly unrelated stff.

take care you stay in time of peace.....
Freedom from the standing army during a time of peace. The agreement of parliament became necessary before the army could be moved against the populace when not at war.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom