TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
Patrick said:There you go again!Any rumor of Lurch for something many people would find repugnant is absurd, no such presumption for Bush!
[snip]
Well, no. Actually neither you, Tmy, doubt, or materia3 really questioned the rumor. Compare that to the instant skepticism (quickly turned back to "ON") about a rumor about Lurch, which is not "incredible" because the self same thing had already been proposed by Gov. Lamb of Colorado, and gave rise to a serious debate.
Patrick, the other rumor was about a possible draft for doctors due to a shortage of military doctors. That's nowhere near as implausible as Kerry suggesting we encourage the old folks to kill themselves to save the country money. If you believe those two things are equally plausible, then I fear for your sanity. Had you started this thread with the exact same post using "Bush" where you said "Lurch" you'd have received the exact same response. I'm sorry you don't believe that, but there's nothing anyone can say to convince you that the rest of the world isn't rabidly partisan.
The repugnancy of a draft is NOT equal to the repugnancy for encouraging the elderly to suicide. Start a poll to compare the two, asking which is more repugnant, if you don't believe me.
And I'm very tired of pointing out the same thing about the other thread. Among others, I pointed out that the premise of the rumor was faulty. That seems to be questioning it, and rather more effectively than swapping insults, diatribe, and straw men. That thread has been thoroughly derailed anyway, but the initial question wasn't "is this rumor true" but "is there precedent for conscription by profession". Everyone, myself included, got sidetracked into a discussion of military doctors.