• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Debate! What debate?

I'm one of those curious people that wants to know the truth. Was it an inside job? or not? I know the Official Story is BS. Arkan_Wolfshade I am sorry what I should have said then is the Official Story is hard to swallow is that better for you?
It's not about what's "better" for me, it's about you being clear about where you stand; what conclusions you do, or do not have; and what you are interested in discussing.
 
You should look more closely. The smoke in your NJ dump fire looks nothing like the vapor hanging around WTC2 in my picture.

And I will ask again, why would the smoke in the rubble fire be such a different color than the smoke in the building fire? It would be the same fuel, right? And it would be more oxygen-starved if anything, right?

Dr. Greening, you've avoided this question every time I've asked.

Ever have a Diesel engine with a dripping fuel injection nozzle?

When you accelerate the engine produces a big cloud of dark black Smoke.

The building fire is fuel rich, producing tons of carbon black, while the rubble fire is oxygen starved producing a lot of vapor and ash, as it slowly burns also more complex chemical reactions are happening in the pile than in the oxygen environment in the buildings.

Fuel rich fires like the fire in the Kuwaiti oil fields that were lit by Saddam's retreating forces, produce a lot of heavy black smoke, as does a chimney fire-jet burner effect.
 
I am curious what Bush meant when he said we should not "tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories".

I wonder about the word TOLERATE....
 
Thanks, so Bush says (in the home of the brave and the land of the free) we should not allow, or permit certain theories about 9/11?
 
From the same Bush speech:

We face enemies that hate .... the TOLERANCE OF OPENNESS and CREATIVE CULTURE that define us.
 
Apollo...I'm pretty sure Bush meant "let's not entertain stupid conspiracy theories."

He wasn't saying "lets not permit them."

I haven't heard of any twoofers being locked up, have you?
 
"I haven't heard of any twoofers being locked up, have you?"

Judging by the opinions expressed by some folks on this site..... its coming!

"Stupid"?

Some people think evolution is pretty stupid
 
Judging by the opinions expressed by some folks on this site..... its coming!

Please direct me to those opinions.

The only ones calling for trials and imprisonment are twoofers. I'm sure most debunkers have been threatened with what's gonna happen to "traitors" when the twoof comes out.
 
Conspiracy theories only come from doubt. Those who believe/accept the official theory shouldn't worry about those that doubt it.
 
Apollo,

I'm really interested in which JREF opinions have you thinking that people here want twoofers locked up.

Conspiracy theories only come from doubt.

They also stem from hate.

Those who believe/accept the official theory shouldn't worry about those that doubt it.

I'm not the least bit worried about a twoofer revolution. I simply resent their constant lies about something so serious and the fact that otherwise smart people fall for their crap.
 
Ah yes, DENIALISM as in:

"Denialism is also a trait common to cranks. This form of denialism takes the form of conspiracy theories, such as the government blew up the World Trade Center, not terrorists, and the Apollo Moon Landing hoax accusations."

And what do they do to "cranks"?
 
Conspiracy theories only come from doubt. Those who believe/accept the official theory shouldn't worry about those that doubt it.
It's not doubt, but deliberate ignorance that I'm concerned about. Ignoring mountains of evidence and excusing terrorists who say they want to kill us, while blaming others for the crimes those terrorists committed, is bad. Encouraging others to be deliberately ignorant is irresponsible.
 

Back
Top Bottom