• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Dealing with Terrorism?

Shadownexius

Student
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Messages
38
I firmly believe that the only true means to put a stop to the current terrorist problems since September 11, is to take a look back into history. What I means is that the Germans had many ideas that very well keep other countries, radical groups, etc in check. In our current situation the only true means to get terriorist to stop is to raise the consequence; this means that I firmly place the belief that we must make our lives worth alot more( 1 American Death = 1,000 Radical Islamic Deaths) One simple presentatiosn of this after the next bombing or attack would force the Terrorists cells to reconsider their attacks. If the attacks continue I propose (Full bombardment of Meeca by means of a sufficient yield nuclear bomb). If you dont agree with this standard post away. I enjoy hearing different ideas on how to deal with terrorism, but I should warn you that I am firmly built on the concept of freedom for America, dictator to the world. Our rights are not their rights, as we have no right to grant them that, if they threatend our citizens. If you have current predicaments with the following statements, I dont care what you feel you should do to protest it.

To restate the above so you can just post one this:

"I belive firmly that to send a message to any form of radicalist or terrorists that are working against the United States is that we rise the cost of American deaths by makine (1 American Death = 1,000 radicalist or terrorist's countries people). The Second consquence if the attacks continue is the complete destruction of Meeca by a sufficient yied nuclear bomb.) Their religious strives against us will cost them greater then they will cost us. The result is that if thye kill 23 Americans, and the terrorist group is that of the country Iraq for instance...We take 23,000 Islamic people and have them killed publicly over a global telecom broadcast. The result is large amounts of fear and ordre from the third world countries and the threat that if they go near our allies, the same fate will take place."

I love all opinions, so post your own idea on how to take care of terrorism, but please be respectful of posting whether your agree or disagree without being an A**WHOLE!!!
 
Knock it off Bjorn...we all know its really you..
 
Last edited:
when Kevin Lowe, Mycroft and I are in unanimous agreement, that should tell you something, namely..

[Monty Python Voice] You're a loony[/Monty Python Voice]
 
You forgot the part about soaking the bullets in pig entrails. You can't really be a whacko would-be genocidist of Islamic people unless you threaten to soak the bullets in pig entrails.
 
A world in which people believe that the appropriate response is 1000 eyes for an eye quickly becomes a world of only blind people.
 
You forgot the part about soaking the bullets in pig entrails. You can't really be a whacko would-be genocidist of Islamic people unless you threaten to soak the bullets in pig entrails.

Would coating a nuke in pig entrails have any effect?
 
Would coating a nuke in pig entrails have any effect?
We're gonna need a bigger pig.

brody02_max.jpg
 
Would coating a nuke in pig entrails have any effect?

He should have suggested that we beat them to death with pigs, feed their corpses to pigs, and fire the pigs' pig-poo into a giant pig-shaped pit full of pig entrails using a cannon made from a hollowed-out pig, because it's the only language they understand.
 
I firmly believe that the only true means to put a stop to the current terrorist problems since September 11, is to take a look back into history. What I means is that the Germans had many ideas that very well keep other countries, radical groups, etc in check. In our current situation the only true means to get terriorist to stop is to raise the consequence; this means that I firmly place the belief that we must make our lives worth alot more( 1 American Death = 1,000 Radical Islamic Deaths) One simple presentatiosn of this after the next bombing or attack would force the Terrorists cells to reconsider their attacks. If the attacks continue I propose (Full bombardment of Meeca by means of a sufficient yield nuclear bomb). If you dont agree with this standard post away. I enjoy hearing different ideas on how to deal with terrorism, but I should warn you that I am firmly built on the concept of freedom for America, dictator to the world. Our rights are not their rights, as we have no right to grant them that, if they threatend our citizens. If you have current predicaments with the following statements, I dont care what you feel you should do to protest it.

To restate the above so you can just post one this:

"I belive firmly that to send a message to any form of radicalist or terrorists that are working against the United States is that we rise the cost of American deaths by makine (1 American Death = 1,000 radicalist or terrorist's countries people). The Second consquence if the attacks continue is the complete destruction of Meeca by a sufficient yied nuclear bomb.) Their religious strives against us will cost them greater then they will cost us. The result is that if thye kill 23 Americans, and the terrorist group is that of the country Iraq for instance...We take 23,000 Islamic people and have them killed publicly over a global telecom broadcast. The result is large amounts of fear and ordre from the third world countries and the threat that if they go near our allies, the same fate will take place."

I love all opinions, so post your own idea on how to take care of terrorism, but please be respectful of posting whether your agree or disagree without being an A**WHOLE!!!


You Sir, are a lunatic....
 
I'll actually post a thought-out response...

Regarding--1,000 militant islamist deaths for every American death... if you go by 9-11 alone, that's three million. If we could locate and identify that many definite militant islamists so easily, we would hardly need to kill them. It's like Steve Martin's "How to make a million dollars and never pay taxes. First, make a million dollars."

Regarding threatening to nuke Mecca in retaliation. First--immoral. If it's ok to bomb a civilian target, then the only thing wrong with terrorism is if it's used against us, and no need for us to get so indignant about it.

Second, it's ineffective... taking that step would ensure the permanent enmity of all Muslim nations. I daresay that is the goal of many terrorist leaders in any case, which brings me to:

Third... Let's be a loaded weapon pointed at Mecca and let anyone pull the trigger. It's really a great idea to be that easy to manipulate, isn't it. Personally I think that if Bin laden got us to nuke Mecca he'd throw a party. He's certainly not going to say "OMG they're not kidding, I better stop now!"
 
I'll actually post a thought-out response...

Regarding--1,000 militant islamist deaths for every American death... if you go by 9-11 alone, that's three million. If we could locate and identify that many definite militant islamists so easily, we would hardly need to kill them. It's like Steve Martin's "How to make a million dollars and never pay taxes. First, make a million dollars."

Regarding threatening to nuke Mecca in retaliation. First--immoral. If it's ok to bomb a civilian target, then the only thing wrong with terrorism is if it's used against us, and no need for us to get so indignant about it.

Second, it's ineffective... taking that step would ensure the permanent enmity of all Muslim nations. I daresay that is the goal of many terrorist leaders in any case, which brings me to:

Third... Let's be a loaded weapon pointed at Mecca and let anyone pull the trigger. It's really a great idea to be that easy to manipulate, isn't it. Personally I think that if Bin laden got us to nuke Mecca he'd throw a party. He's certainly not going to say "OMG they're not kidding, I better stop now!"
The problem with this is that we dont need take only militant islamic people. If the United States represents is self as a land of opporunity only to its people, and a dicator to the world. Third world countries like those of the Middle East would be afraid of us. An eye for an eye is a radical response to a radical terrorist group. It is the only language they do speak; so if they recieve this response they will understand the United States will not tolorate terrorism and will not negotiate, unless the loss of life is more on the terrorist side. It is not lunatic. I wish it wasnt a necessary cause, but truthfully it is the only thing that would speak louder then words to them. The only other responce is that if it fails, we nuke Mecca with the largest yield bomb we have using Norads Atlas targeting system. Precise targeting, no warning we are going to bomb them. We would cripple their pilgrimage and place a message that the terrorist understand. Radical terriorism calls for Radical Rules of Engagement.
 
The problem with this is that we dont need take only militant islamic people. If the United States represents is self as a land of opporunity only to its people, and a dicator to the world. Third world countries like those of the Middle East would be afraid of us. An eye for an eye is a radical response to a radical terrorist group. It is the only language they do speak; so if they recieve this response they will understand the United States will not tolorate terrorism and will not negotiate, unless the loss of life is more on the terrorist side. It is not lunatic. I wish it wasnt a necessary cause, but truthfully it is the only thing that would speak louder then words to them. The only other responce is that if it fails, we nuke Mecca with the largest yield bomb we have using Norads Atlas targeting system. Precise targeting, no warning we are going to bomb them. We would cripple their pilgrimage and place a message that the terrorist understand. Radical terriorism calls for Radical Rules of Engagement.
Hmmm.. Has anybody mentioned you're stark raving mad? If so it bears repeating.
 

Back
Top Bottom