Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

slojoe said:
ergo sure seems to have exited this thread abruptly.

Are his arguments always this pitiful? He started out pushing the idea explosions might not have been heard, and ended up insisting witnesses had to have heard explosions.
Click to expand...

He epic bailed because he didn't think a "bedunker" could refute and source a single truther point.

So I did, like 9 of 'em from one building.

Haven't seen a hair of him since.
 
femr2 said:
Seems rather a feeble stance. The OP contains, as far as I'm concerned, not much beyond the question...

...and if you have no reasoned answer to that question you're not really in a position to wallpaper the place with immature huge red fonts, in my opinion ;)


So you can walk away, but to close the thread you need to know the effect upon the sound from source to receiver, in detail.


I don't think the question is too unreasonable.


Have fun.
Click to expand...

We do when you post.
 
NoahFence said:
He epic bailed because he didn't think a "bedunker" could refute and source a single truther point.

So I did, like 9 of 'em from one building.

Haven't seen a hair of him since.
Click to expand...

He'll lie low for a while and then start another daft thread.
 
I'm fine with having errors out of the NIST report pointed out, along with criticisms of other writings on the WTC stuff, but you need more than that to discuss convincing people that explosives were used in any way, shape or form. For the record, talking about the ability of microphones to pick up the sounds, consider for a moment that any explosive near by would override any sound coming from someone speaking while being captured on film. I'd say, that while the mic's might arguably have some inefficiencies (as all electronics do in converting electrical signals to sound and vice versa) their inefficiencies are not influential enough to be much of a factor here. As for our thread opener, ergo; what he thinks of anyone here, is pretty much known along with his argument, and the fact he won't change it. If the prior case was little more than condescension, that's about as productive as him ignoring the thread all together.

Just saying...
 
Oh don't worry. Ergo will be back after spring break is up at his high school...
 
Huh. thread's been bumped several times, but...nobody seems to be here. Spooky.
 
triforcharity said:
I am currently listening to the fourth section of audio from the FDNY Manhattan dispatch.
(Found here and at 10:00 Brooklyn dispatch comes on and advises that the PD has a report of a bomb in the Brooklyn Battery Tunnel. What is the first thing he says?

Stay the **** out.

Imagine that.
Click to expand...


I'm guessing that ergo will ignore this again. Truther troll is truthfully trolling, I guess.
 
ergo said:
Huh. thread's been bumped several times, but...nobody seems to be here. Spooky.
Click to expand...

Hmmm... that's because it's a web based forum, not a live chat room. You sort of leave a message and reply to ones left to you.

...for example the one triforcharity left to you regarding the audio clips.

Now that you've returned, why not give a crack eh? what can it harm?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom