Merged Core-led collapse and explosive demolition

[TruthersLie]

Or just seeing if he has figured out the differences between into and onto.

I figured it out rather quickly... My kids have... I wonder if ergo ever has.

 

[slojoe]

Huh. thread's been bumped several times, but...nobody seems to be here. Spooky.

Ergo! Glad to see you back. After the debunkings hit triforcharity, NoahFence, and I put your argument through, I feared you'd abandoned JREF and moved onto the basket weaving forum.

But since you've had two weeks to research, I'm sure you're back to offer well reasoned, persuasive responses.

Right?

 

[walkyrie]

The speed at which the buildings all over suddenly disintegrated should be the most obvious indication that explosives were used. Most engineers as well as non-technical people should be able to grasp this

 

[triforcharity]

Argument from personal ignorance noted.

How fast/slow should it have fallen?

List any assumptions, and show your math.

 

[TruthersLie]

The speed at which the buildings all over suddenly disintegrated should be the most obvious indication that explosives were used. Most engineers as well as non-technical people should be able to grasp this

YOu keep on using words that you do not understand.

How did the buildings "disintegrate?"

Most engineers as well as non technical people understand that the buildings didn't "disintegrate." YOu might just want to look up what that term means.

 

[slojoe]

The speed at which the buildings all over suddenly disintegrated should be the most obvious indication that explosives were used. Most engineers as well as non-technical people should be able to grasp this

Loud bangs in rapid sequence & spikes on seismographic recordings would be more obvious indicators that explosives were used. Didn't seem to be any of those.

 

[Animal]

The speed at which the buildings all over suddenly disintegrated should be the most obvious indication that explosives were used. Most engineers as well as non-technical people should be able to grasp this

The lack of sharp loud noises just prior to the collapse, the lack of any seismic signature, and the lack of an debris associated with explosives is a most obvious indication that explosives were not used in the collapse of the WTC. Almost all engineers as well as non-technical people grasp this.

 

[walkyrie]

It was obvious the first day that the three buildings disintegrated as part of a picture perfect controlled demolition. Particularly building 7, which had no plausible reason to fall. Careful examination of quality video even shows the timing of the explosive charge detonations as they progress down the structure.It has recently been brought to my attention that the "thermite" that some proponents speak of could have been used to pre-weaken the structure so that fewer explosive charges could be used to control the demolition.

 

[ergo]

It has recently been brought to my attention that the "thermite" that some proponents speak of could have been used to pre-weaken the structure so that fewer explosive charges could be used to control the demolition.

It's also mentioned in the OP and in my subsequent arguments.

 

[dafydd]

It was obvious the first day that the three buildings disintegrated as part of a picture perfect controlled demolition. Particularly building 7, which had no plausible reason to fall. Careful examination of quality video even shows the timing of the explosive charge detonations as they progress down the structure.It has recently been brought to my attention that the "thermite" that some proponents speak of could have been used to pre-weaken the structure so that fewer explosive charges could be used to control the demolition.

Who planted them,how was it done,etc. You truthers always ignore tiny details like that. Please give me your full theory concerning 911.

 

[Grizzly Bear]

It has recently been brought to my attention that the "thermite" that some proponents speak of could have been used to pre-weaken the structure so that fewer explosive charges could be used to control the demolition.

For someone whose been linking to 2003 materials in his posts for the last several months you seem strangely out of the loop with the quality psuedo-science you're following and supporting. But 2 points for actually making your case without one-liner links.

 

[Animal]

It was obvious the first day that the three buildings disintegrated as part of a picture perfect controlled demolition. Particularly building 7, which had no plausible reason to fall. Careful examination of quality video even shows the timing of the explosive charge detonations as they progress down the structure.It has recently been brought to my attention that the "thermite" that some proponents speak of could have been used to pre-weaken the structure so that fewer explosive charges could be used to control the demolition.

Truth by "youtube"

So why did the "explosions" not show up on the seismic monitoring stations?
How did the explosives get into the building?
Where were they placed?
How and where was the "thermite" placed

How was the destruction of the WTC a "picture perfect controlled demolition" when there were so many other buildings damaged? I am sure the members of St. Nicholas Church would disagree with your description of "picture perfect"

 

[triforcharity]

Hey Ergo,

ever going to address THIS post?

I mean, it;s not even 5 sentences. Damn, you must be afraid of that post for some reason. If only I could figure out what that reason was......

 

[slojoe]

Hey Ergo,

ever going to address THIS post?

I mean, it;s not even 5 sentences. Damn, you must be afraid of that post for some reason. If only I could figure out what that reason was......

I've been wondering the same thing about this post. What would make ergo disappear for 2 weeks?

Maybe because I posted at 9:11 PM?

 

[walkyrie]

The first thing I point out to people who ask me about it is the "resistance paradox." The WTC towers' top portions fell through the steel and concrete of the lower portions about as fast as chunks and pieces from them were falling through the adjacent air. Assuming a collapse, this would indicate the lower portions provided little more resistance to the tops than air would. Yet the top portions disintegrated while falling,This is an irresolvable paradox, material cannot simultaneously present high and low resistance. Controlled demolition on the other hand explain both phenomena. There are many aspects of the 9/11 WTC events which to me indicate controlled demolitions.

 

[ozeco41]

The first thing I point out to people who ask me about it is the "resistance paradox." The WTC towers' top portions fell through the steel and concrete of the lower portions about as fast as chunks and pieces from them were falling through the adjacent air. Assuming a collapse, this would indicate the lower portions provided little more resistance to the tops than air would. Yet the top portions disintegrated while falling,This is an irresolvable paradox, material cannot simultaneously present high and low resistance. Controlled demolition on the other hand explain both phenomena. There are many aspects of the 9/11 WTC events which to me indicate controlled demolitions.

Its a pity you cannot do physics or engineering. You wouldn't keep making those nonsense claims which you have borrowed from some truther guru or other.

...so find out how the Twin Towers collapsed.

The silliest part of your nonsense is that it is harder to explain the problems you pretend are there by CD than it is by what really happened.

 

[Justin39640]

Its a pity you cannot do physics or engineering. You wouldn't keep making those nonsense claims which you have borrowed from some truther guru or other.

...so find out how the Twin Towers collapsed.

The silliest part of your nonsense is that it is harder to explain the problems you pretend are there by CD than it is by what really happened.

He's never answered a single post. Trolls don't care about learning.

 

[aggle-rithm]

Remember those Japanese soldiers who kept holding out on South Pacific islands long after the war was over?

That's what this reminds me of.

 

[aggle-rithm]

The first thing I point out to people who ask me about it is the "resistance paradox." The WTC towers' top portions fell through the steel and concrete of the lower portions about as fast as chunks and pieces from them were falling through the adjacent air.

Nope.

Assuming a collapse, this would indicate the lower portions provided little more resistance to the tops than air would.

Yep.

Yet the top portions disintegrated while falling,This is an irresolvable paradox, material cannot simultaneously present high and low resistance.

Fortunately this didn't happen.

Controlled demolition on the other hand explain both phenomena. There are many aspects of the 9/11 WTC events which to me indicate controlled demolitions.

To you? I'm not surprised.

 

[dafydd]

The first thing I point out to people who ask me about it is the "resistance paradox." The WTC towers' top portions fell through the steel and concrete of the lower portions about as fast as chunks and pieces from them were falling through the adjacent air. Assuming a collapse, this would indicate the lower portions provided little more resistance to the tops than air would. Yet the top portions disintegrated while falling,This is an irresolvable paradox, material cannot simultaneously present high and low resistance. Controlled demolition on the other hand explain both phenomena. There are many aspects of the 9/11 WTC events which to me indicate controlled demolitions.

No.