Continuation: 'What about building 7?'

Thank you for that explanation Tony.

That makes a great deal of sense.

The east penthouse housed very heavy a/c equipment and without the pre-dispersement achieved by dropping it prior to global collapse, 7WTC would have remained east side top heavy.

It would have been very difficult to obtain the observed balanced collapse from the lower floor core implosion without that east penthouse weight re-distribution.

For whatever reasons, it is apparent that those who engineered the collapse, went to great lengths to avoid the tremendous external damage that would have occurred had the 47-storey 7WTC toppled onto nearby buildings.

Not sad in the least that this idiot was banned, but truth be told, I'm going to miss the comedy gold in posts like these.
 
Not sad in the least that this idiot was banned, but truth be told, I'm going to miss the comedy gold in posts like these.
Actually, I was looking forward to showing where he pulled his belief of:
MM said:
"It would have been very difficult to obtain the observed balanced collapse from the lower floor core implosion without that east penthouse weight re-distribution"

Obviously he pulled it out of thin air (not where I would have shown). I wonder if Tony will come to his defense with science......:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I like the weirdly inconsistent idea that all three buildings were CDd, they didnt give two cents about destroying every other building in the immediate context as collateral bu suddenly had a change of heart with WTC7

Having already committed mass murder, they're suddenly worried about wrecking property? Somebody check Larry Silverstein's voter registration! It's got to be Republican. :boxedin:
 

Back
Top Bottom