• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Clinton Crime Family Foundation

Foolmewunz said:
The foundation is NOT their income. Prove it or remove it.

For all intents and purposes the Clintons, notwithstanding the book and speaking earnings potential, were broke in 2000. They owed 10,000,000 in legal fees. (Thanks, GOP! It almost worked.)

And you seem to have avoided responding to my points on The Bush Crime Syndicate. How come? Apparently all the Bushies have pet foundations where they get ratings of like 2 out of 4 by the various foundation-watch groups, employ their good old boy buddies at exorbitant salaries and gather "donations" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) from people who are solely interested in preserving history and have no interest whatsoever in currying favor with the Bush Dynasty.

So, how's that coming? You working up a detailed response, are you? Or are you going to LOL-Librul! it away, as always? As someone else stated above... it's your thread... we're all On Topic. Now you can either respond or be seen to have nothing in your holster to reload your little pop gun.
Click to expand...

I never said it was their income, they use it to move wealth around, travel, paying lavish salary's. A foundation can be a legal way to pay people back or even buy favors. As to your comment about the Bush's, if you haven't noticed this is about the Clintons charity which only pays out 15%, does that strike you as odd, probably not. Besides the Bush's are well known as being great people and very charitable, the Clintons are well known crooks and your hero Bill is quite the ladies man.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...cco-last-month-cost-taxpayers-21k_962035.html
Morocco is such a giving country
 
Last edited:
logger said:
I never said it was their income, they use it to move wealth around, travel, paying lavish salary's. A foundation can be a legal way to pay people back or even buy favors. As to your comment about the Bush's, if you haven't noticed this is about the Clintons charity which only pays out 15%, does that strike you as odd, probably not. Besides the Bush's are well known as being great people and very charitable, the Clintons are well known crooks and your hero Bill is quite the ladies man.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs...cco-last-month-cost-taxpayers-21k_962035.html
Morocco is such a giving country
Click to expand...

This thread's about The Clinton Crime Family. That's a bald-faced lie, so it behooves us LOL LIBRULS to point out the partisanship in your logic and argumentation. As with other noted HDS sufferers, the pretense of it being about an a priori moral conviction is shown to be nonsensical because none of you will condemn the good folk on the Republican side of the aisle who do the exact same things,.... and worse.

I mean.... it's The Shrub! Who, this side of Comedy Central, is going to be willing to pay him a hundred thousand bucks to make a speech? You don't see a little cronyism in there? Peddling of influence of Daddy and his brother? W probably left office with all his daddy's money in tact, but he still had to make a living and chose the path that's available to a former POTUS. Making speeches and writing books. And the Bushes are a dynasty, just as much as the Clintons are. Yet, you have no problem with their actions.
 
Molinaro said:
That is the complete opposite of what a skeptic expects.

If someone is making a claim, it their responsibility to support it. And a skeptic should always be asking for that support.
Click to expand...

so you did not google anything.

'k.

I'll do it for you when I get in.

Courage.
 
logger said:
Lol
Clinton said she was broke when they left the Whitehouse, remember the foundation is just a front for them, its a professional way of moving money around.
Click to expand...
You could perhaps show evidence of this? You have some wire transfers or bank records to show us?
 
Craig4 said:
You could perhaps show evidence of this? You have some wire transfers or bank records to show us?
Click to expand...

LOL conservatives don't care about things like evidence. They just believe whatever makes them feel better.
 
Tony Stark said:
Lol op. I can't wait for election day. So many conservative heads will explode when Hillary Clinton is elected President of the United States by the American people.
Click to expand...

Any schadenfreude that I may be tempted to feel will be more than offset by my sadness of facing four more years of mule-headed obstructionism, childish name calling, sanctimonious moralizing, and chicken-little hysteria. And all that will be followed by calls to move further to the right.
 
Ladewig said:
Any schadenfreude that I may be tempted to feel will be more than offset by my sadness of facing four more years of mule-headed obstructionism, childish name calling, sanctimonious moralizing, and chicken-little hysteria. And all that will be followed by calls to move further to the right.
Click to expand...

I'd like to think that if Hillary were to win, the GOP would get the realization they need to make real changes to their platform.

But you're right; they'd double-down yet again.
 
Ladewig said:
Any schadenfreude that I may be tempted to feel will be more than offset by my sadness of facing four more years of mule-headed obstructionism, childish name calling, sanctimonious moralizing, and chicken-little hysteria. And all that will be followed by calls to move further to the right.
Click to expand...

k.

This thread is about the Clinton Family Foundation. Case in point, Hillary put a political operative on the payroll that Obama had specifically vetoed.

It is funny, I posted that a few times, yet not getting a whole lot of commentary from her fans. I mean we got this off topic stuff in response to a typical off topic post from Iron Man.

anything, tho, remotely on topic?
 
I think this is a very important subject. My own personal bias is against Clinton but intellectually I don't see any valid arguments to cause me to think this is somehow significant. Just a lot of bizarre rhetorical nonsense.

Does anyone know of a sound argument against the Clinton Foundation? No fallacy Please. :)
 
RandFan said:
Does anyone know of a sound argument against the Clinton Foundation? No fallacy Please. :)
Click to expand...

Once again, this thread is not about the foundation being wrong or wrong in what they're doing, it is about the distasteful people running it. More specifically it is about showing everyone how low liberals will go to defend the indefensible, and its been quite fun.
 
Last edited:
Foolmewunz said:
This thread's about The Clinton Crime Family. That's a bald-faced lie, so it behooves us LOL LIBRULS to point out the partisanship in your logic and argumentation. As with other noted HDS sufferers, the pretense of it being about an a priori moral conviction is shown to be nonsensical because none of you will condemn the good folk on the Republican side of the aisle who do the exact same things,.... and worse.
Click to expand...
When you start a thread about the other side doing the exact same thing, lm sure we would condemn it, so your continued thread derails can stop.
I mean.... it's The Shrub! Who, this side of Comedy Central, is going to be willing to pay him a hundred thousand bucks to make a speech? You don't see a little cronyism in there? Peddling of influence of Daddy and his brother? W probably left office with all his daddy's money in tact, but he still had to make a living and chose the path that's available to a former POTUS. Making speeches and writing books. And the Bushes are a dynasty, just as much as the Clintons are. Yet, you have no problem with their actions.
Click to expand...

Lol
Ok, fine whatever you say.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom