• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Bush says Mastermind and most terrorists behind 9/11 attacks are in custody

Usual Suspect

Unregistered
Joined
Oct 2, 2006
Messages
228
WTF?!?!? Watching Bush'a press conference right now and he just said the mastermind and most terrorists behind the 9/11 attacks are in custody and will be brought to justice. Hello?!?!? Am I the only one that finds something wrong with that?? I thought most of the terrorists behind the attacks DIED on 9/11. And Mr. President, we have Osama in custody?? I'm waiting for a damn reporter to question his words.
 
WTF?!?!? Watching Bush'a press conference right now and he just said the mastermind and most terrorists behind the 9/11 attacks are in custody and will be brought to justice. Hello?!?!? Am I the only one that finds something wrong with that?? I thought most of the terrorists behind the attacks DIED on 9/11. And Mr. President, we have Osama in custody?? I'm waiting for a damn reporter to question his words.
KSM was the mastermind of that mission, OBL the leader of Al Q. A subtle difference, but there ya go.

DR
 
Khaleed Sheik Mohammed planned the actual terror attack. He is in Gitmo right now. H was in a secret CIA prison before that. Osama Bin Laden financed the mission and gave KSM people.
 
Do you honestly think that how these people work is like some James Bond flick where they use a plasma flat screen TV to talk to their great powerful leader Osama Bin Laden, who is sitting in his thorn surrounded by a small lake of bloodthirsty sharks?

OBL didn't have to be directly involved. Atta was capable of leading a group of his men into the United States and pull this off. They weren't super evil people; they were regular guys like you and I.

Why is so hard to grasp such a concept for you deniers?
 
WTF?!?!? Watching Bush'a press conference right now and he just said the mastermind and most terrorists behind the 9/11 attacks are in custody and will be brought to justice. Hello?!?!? Am I the only one that finds something wrong with that?? I thought most of the terrorists behind the attacks DIED on 9/11. And Mr. President, we have Osama in custody?? I'm waiting for a damn reporter to question his words.

Well, you expect him to say that they can't catch them or the war on terror is a failure or something. politicians are known to present them selves in a more positive light than they'd deserve... It's called spin.
 
Do you honestly think that how these people work is like some James Bond flick where they use a plasma flat screen TV to talk to their great powerful leader Osama Bin Laden, who is sitting in his thorn surrounded by a small lake of bloodthirsty sharks?

Hey, the sharks are real. I saw it in a report some general left open back when I worked at CENTCOM...
 
Do you honestly think that how these people work is like some James Bond flick where they use a plasma flat screen TV to talk to their great powerful leader Osama Bin Laden, who is sitting in his thorn surrounded by a small lake of bloodthirsty sharks?

OBL didn't have to be directly involved. Atta was capable of leading a group of his men into the United States and pull this off. They weren't super evil people; they were regular guys like you and I.

Why is so hard to grasp such a concept for you deniers?


No that's not how I see it. But how are most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody?? Are you saying 19 hijackers did not die on 9/11??

As for KSM was the mastermind of that mission. We were told days after 9/11 that OBL was the mastermind so now we don't hold our government accountable for just changing the story to fit their needs?? And I'm the denier.... OOOOOOOOOKay
 
Well, you expect him to say that they can't catch them or the war on terror is a failure or something. politicians are known to present them selves in a more positive light than they'd deserve... It's called spin.


And I'm just pointing out the spin but since I'm a denier the spin is less important. That makes sense.
 
No that's not how I see it. But how are most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody?? Are you saying 19 hijackers did not die on 9/11??

As for KSM was the mastermind of that mission. We were told days after 9/11 that OBL was the mastermind so now we don't hold our government accountable for just changing the story to fit their needs?? And I'm the denier.... OOOOOOOOOKay
Does it occur to you that information gleaned from interrogting KSM might be used to offer better info than was originally put out when less detail was known?

That is called updating information, not denial. No one had or has instantaneous understanding of what an ememy is doing. As time passes and more information is considered and vetted, a better picture is formed of what went on. See also how a detective solves a murder, or the recent case of Mr Karr who, on first reports, confessed to killing Ms Ramsey, but who once MORE INFORMATION WAS DEVELOPED AND CONSIDERED, was shown to have not done so.

Head out, pal, or you will suffocate.

DR
 
No that's not how I see it. But how are most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody?? Are you saying 19 hijackers did not die on 9/11??

As for KSM was the mastermind of that mission. We were told days after 9/11 that OBL was the mastermind so now we don't hold our government accountable for just changing the story to fit their needs?? And I'm the denier.... OOOOOOOOOKay

"terrorists behind the attacks" is not equivalent to "terrorists that carried out the attacks".
 
Does it occur to you that information gleaned from interrogting KSM might be used to offer better info than was originally put out when less detail was known?

That is called updating information, not denial. No one had or has instantaneous understanding of what an ememy is doing. As time passes and more information is considered and vetted, a better picture is formed of what went on. See also how a detective solves a murder, or the recent case of Mr Karr who, on first reports, confessed to killing Ms Ramsey, but who once MORE INFORMATION WAS DEVELOPED AND CONSIDERED, was shown to have not done so.
Ah, Investigooglinggating!
 
No that's not how I see it. But how are most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody?? Are you saying 19 hijackers did not die on 9/11??

Here's another example in suport of my thesis that CTists don't know how to hold a simple conversation.

Anyone else would understand "most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody" to include the implicit phrase "Oh, except for all the dead ones, you tool."

Okay, maybe not the "tool" part, but I stand by the rest of it.

Once again, I have to wonder: Do they nitpick conversations like this when they talk to their mothers? Could that be why they all seem to have such problems?
 
Here's another example in suport of my thesis that CTists don't know how to hold a simple conversation.

Anyone else would understand "most of the terrorists behind the attacks in custody" to include the implicit phrase "Oh, except for all the dead ones, you tool."

Okay, maybe not the "tool" part, but I stand by the rest of it.

Once again, I have to wonder: Do they nitpick conversations like this when they talk to their mothers? Could that be why they all seem to have such problems?


AH so now it's nitpicked and I understand the difference between "behind" and "carried out" though are you saying those who carried out the attacks also weren't behind them?? I'm mean seriously. You people are now sounding as sane as the LC crew. You're actually making excuses for Bush and deeming it acceptable.

Anyway I gotta get back to work. Later tonight I'll grab my JREF straight jacket and come back to have fun with you all.
 
Hi usual suspects

Just thought I would echo what has already been said to you. The mastermind behind 911 is infact in custody (KSM). He came up with the plan in 1996 and it was rejected by Al Quada. In 1998 UBL the spiritual leader of Al Quada changed his mind and endorsed it.

In 1998 the plan was called the "plane operation".

Not masterminded by UBL but fully endorsed by him. The story has not changed.

Hope that clears things up for you.
 
Last edited:
You can't blame Usual Suspects for becoming confused. After all, the "truth" movement constantly pretend that the only al Qaeda admission of responsibility for 9/11 is a single "fake" tape, so stories like this one aren't discussed very much:

Two lieutenants of Osama bin Laden's terrorist group, Al Qaeda, met a reporter from the al-Jazeera television network - revealing they were the masterminds behind the attacks on the US last year.
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/stories/s689774.htm
 
And I'm just pointing out the spin but since I'm a denier the spin is less important. That makes sense.

Oh I'm sorry I didn't know you were a "denier".

So is the point of this thread that you think that Bush is full of crap. Shouldn't this be in the politics section then, and there really isn't need for you to point out that Bush is full of crap everybody knows it already. By supporting ridiculous CTs you only help to dircredit the opposition to Bush.
 
AH so now it's nitpicked and I understand the difference between "behind" and "carried out" though are you saying those who carried out the attacks also weren't behind them?? I'm mean seriously. You people are now sounding as sane as the LC crew. You're actually making excuses for Bush and deeming it acceptable.

Anyway I gotta get back to work. Later tonight I'll grab my JREF straight jacket and come back to have fun with you all.

Are you claiming that the 19 hijackers orchastrated, and funded, operation on their own?
 
AH so now it's nitpicked and I understand the difference between "behind" and "carried out" though are you saying those who carried out the attacks also weren't behind them??

Those "behind" the attacks is a set that includes those that "carried out" the attacks, plus an indeterminate number of other people. Most of the people in the first (behind) set, who were not also in the second (carried out) set, are now alleged to be in custody. Get it now, or do I need to figure out how to post Venn Diagrams?



I'm mean seriously. You people are now sounding as sane as the LC crew. You're actually making excuses for Bush and deeming it acceptable.

And once again we see the old "If you agree with anything you must agree with everything" argument.

To be clear: In a lot of cases, GWBush is a putz, whom I disagree with. This case is not one of them. I reserve the right to make this determination in any particular case. You are free to do whatever you want, as well. I expect it will include some more misrepresentation of our positions, but hey, whatever floats you boat.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom