• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Building collapses with NO explosives.

Thunder

Banned
T
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
34,918
Last edited:
parky76 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwOwQ9HI4IA&feature=related (plane crashes into building, then building collapses due to fire)
Click to expand...

parky, that video is a mishmash of events. audio from a San Diego crash (with Julie chen) (but it wasn't caught on tape) however the rest of the audio is the TODAY SHOW commentary from 9/11/2001, and the building in the beginning is not the same building in the rest of the video (looks to be a CGI of a plane/f18 crashing into a unknown building). The owner of the account you just linked to is a WTC /911/ truther


The building at the end is this one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZaK5YVVaRCo


the "stolen" footage seems to be from this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bizr86N-4nc

The building in question is the Faculty of Architecture Building, Delft University of Technology, in Holland. - which did suffer a collapse, but it was due to Fire, that started in one of the Faculty rooms (coffee maker it was believed)


more videos of the fire:
http://www.youtube.com/results?sear...fire&search_type=&aq=0&oq=Delft+University+fi
 
Last edited:
parky76 said:
and...the pie'ce de re'sistance!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwOwQ9HI4IA&feature=related (plane crashes into building, then building collapses due to fire)
Click to expand...


ae4mte.jpg
 
ooh didnt see the first one before
 
Last edited:
There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives.
 
Profanz said:
There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives.
Click to expand...

False. See WTC 1, 2, and 7. Unless you want to prove that explosives were used those cases. Which you, of course, will not do.

Yet another Epic Fail for you.
 
That one in Lisbon was pulverised into dust! Only high-tech weaponry being developed in Los Alamos can perform such a feet.
 
Profanz said:
There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives.
Click to expand...

and yet, there is no evidence of any explosives in the WTC.

another tragic Truther fail.
 
dtugg said:
False. See WTC 1, 2, and 7. Unless you want to prove that explosives were used those cases. Which you, of course, will not do.

Yet another Epic Fail for you.
Click to expand...

I'm talking about factual events that can compare to what is claimed to have happened to the buildings on 9/11 dtugg. Not the religious claims of what happened to the WTC complexes themselves.
 
Last edited:
i wonder what would happen if a fully fueled 757 crashed into this building.

b74f592f26fae98a
 
Profanz said:
I'm talking about factual events that can be compare to what is claimed to have happened to the buildings on 9/11 dtugg. Not the religious claims of what happened to the WTC complexes themselves.
Click to expand...

Your perfect string of failures is untarnished.

You said "There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives."

Since WTC 1, 2, and 7 are a subset of steel high rise buildings that have been completely destroyed, you must prove that they were destroying using explosives or your claim is false and you are a liar. But you being a liar is a shock to exactly nobody.
 
Ahh yes, the "steel skyscrapers are indestructible" meme.
 
Profanz said:
There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives.
Click to expand...

First time in history bs.... really?

Prior to 1959, no man had ever been into outerspace. Does that mean that manned spaceflight is fake?

Prior to 1945 no city had ever been destroyed with ONE bomb. Does that mean nuclear weapons are fake?

prior to...

we can do this all day.
 
Profanz said:
There are no steel high rise buildings that have ever been completely destroyed because of anything other than explosives.
Click to expand...

Please prove your assertion. Links to the cause of all collapses there have ever been of steel high rise buildings would be adequate. Without this proof, your unsourced claim is worthless and irrelevant.

Dave
 
These were all terrible examples of "debunkery". If truthers presented evidence similar to the quality of this you would all call them Morons!

Yet, since a Debunker showed a bunch of old concrete brick buildings collapsing, everyone is all smiles. Please everyone take this for what it is....CRAP! Things like this only give truthers more fuel. Even the dumbest truthers can see how blatantly stupid this is. Please, dont give them anything else.
 
AJM8125 said:


Fail.
Click to expand...

Another bad example. The dam building fell over intact, like truthers claim a building should with such damage. Like they think the WTC should have.

Plus even though the announcer said said "Steel", i believe that is mostly a concrete structure. Most apartments are made from concrete because of the cost effectiveness. Besides, it was made in the dam Philippines! Half the buildings there look like they might topple over.
lolz
 
OneShotKi11 said:
Yet, since a Debunker showed a bunch of old concrete brick buildings collapsing, everyone is all smiles. .
Click to expand...

Really because I've only seen "debunkers" telling Parky where he was wrong, and a derail from Profanz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom