Building 7 Exploding BEFORE WTC1 "Collapse"

ImANiceGuy said:
Bill - In a previous thread you promised the "grand unification theory" of 9/11 conspiracies.....can you share your secrets with me?

I'm a truther. I know Bush was in on it......they use goats in sacrificial satanic ceremonies; hence, "My Pet Goat".
Click to expand...

delete.Off topic
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Ah Scott you shouldn't blame the firefighters for not coming forward. Have a look at the attached video and then ask yourself why we have never seen these guys interviewed and probed on multiple TV shows ? As I know guys like these they are generally happy to be on TV, '' boom-booom-boom-boom-boom--like detonatotors like you wanted to bring down a building. 'We ran at least two blocks...'' Those guys could name their own price on TV to this day.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ4dVo5QgYg Firemen's Testimony- Study

Now you are probably thinking that they and their families are being intimidated into silence to this day. Possibly because of their pensions being threatened or their fear for the lives of their family members. because it is clear from the video that this testimony should have been heard at the 9/11 commission hearings. As it was these firemen's statements were prohibited.
Click to expand...

Good job using a video that is just quote mining firefighters again Bill.

Can you find any of them today? You guys even know their names, but you dont want to because you know it would destroy your fantasy. The same reason you dont want to attack the FDNY and tell them to tell the truth about Building 7 and stop covering up the truth. Why wont you ask them to do that Bill?
 
Edx said:
Good job using a video that is just quote mining firefighters again Bill.

Can you find any of them today? You guys even know their names, but you dont want to because you know it would destroy your fantasy. The same reason you dont want to attack the FDNY and tell them to tell the truth about Building 7 and stop covering up the truth. Why wont you ask them to do that Bill?
Click to expand...

Luckily the mine of quotes is extremely rich in this case. Would you like me to post the text of just a few dozen together out of the 12,000 pages of firemen's testimonies ? It makes a big impact. Any else can ask too.

Watch the takers line up Readers. lol
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
Luckily the mine of quotes is extremely rich in this case. Would you like me to post the text of just a few dozen together out of the 12,000 pages of firemen's testimonies ? It makes a big impact. Any else can ask too.

Watch the takers line up Readers. lol
Click to expand...
Why don't you link to all the pages and let the readers decide?
 
DGM said:
Why don't you link to all the pages and let the readers decide?
Click to expand...

I better not on second thought. Too off-topic maybe.

I feel I should alert you that by speaking to me you have been excommunicated from the Congregation of Carlitos. ( See his warning in an earlier post)
 
Last edited:
bill smith said:
This was shown on Italian Television in 2007 and titled 'Seven is Exploding'. Hear the witness at the end saying that the FDNY directly told her that 'they were going to have to bring the building down'.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58h0LjdMry0
Click to expand...

Another interesting thing in this video is that the lady says that the FDNY was talking about bringing WTC7 down at 12 or 1 o'clock. Didn't Lucky Larry Silverstein say that he was discussing ' pulling' the building with the FDNY at around 12 o'Clock ?
 
bill smith said:
Well do you think that an extremely tall skyscraper like WTC7 could fall down naturally from only fire between two or three other skyscrapers not more than a dozen or so feet away on three sides and do only a relatively small amount of damage to those other buildings ? Would that be called 'falling into it's own footprint' which is the hallmark of successful controlled demolition.
Click to expand...

Really Bill? Are you freaking kidding me? Nobody can POSSIBLY say something that dumb and believe it, can they?

414px-Fiterman_hall_damage.jpg


I rest my case.
 
bill smith said:
Well do you think that an extremely tall skyscraper like WTC7 could fall down naturally from only fire between two or three other skyscrapers not more than a dozen or so feet away on three sides and do only a relatively small amount of damage to those other buildings?
Click to expand...

well yes, compared to a nuclear bomb.
 
triforcharity said:
Really Bill? Are you freaking kidding me? Nobody can POSSIBLY say something that dumb and believe it, can they?

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/414px-Fiterman_hall_damage.jpg[/qimg]

I rest my case.
Click to expand...
At this point I think he's trying to beat Telltale Tom.
 
bill smith said:
Luckily the mine of quotes is extremely rich in this case. Would you like me to post the text of just a few dozen together out of the 12,000 pages of firemen's testimonies ? It makes a big impact. Any else can ask too.

Watch the takers line up Readers. lol
Click to expand...

Please do Bill. Remember to cite your source. I will wait, and tear your BS to shreds.
 
triforcharity said:
Really Bill? Are you freaking kidding me? Nobody can POSSIBLY say something that dumb and believe it, can they?

[qimg]http://i63.photobucket.com/albums/h131/triathlete247/WTC%20Attack/414px-Fiterman_hall_damage.jpg[/qimg]

I rest my case.
Click to expand...

That's very moderate damage considering that a huge skyscraper just came to ground in it's own footprint just a few yards away. Readers can check the amazing photos in the attached hyperlink if they feel that there is any doubt about this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6094653&postcount=59
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
bill smith said:
That's very moderate damage considering that a huge skyscraper just came to ground in it's own footprint just a few yards away. Readers can check the amazing photos in the attached hyperlink if they feel that there is any doubt about this.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=6094653&postcount=59
Click to expand...

You mean the ones that say WTC7 before (standing, so on 9/11 or likely before) and WTC7 seconds later with a timestamp of 9/13 and clearly after the street has been cleaned off most debris?

Yes, we should definitely look at this intentionally deceptive set of photos as a comparison instead of the one that directly shows damage.

Good grief.
 
Gorgonian said:
You mean the ones that say WTC7 before (standing, so on 9/11 or likely before) and WTC7 seconds later with a timestamp of 9/13 and clearly after the street has been cleaned off most debris?

Yes, we should definitely look at this intentionally deceptive set of photos as a comparison instead of the one that directly shows damage.

Good grief.
Click to expand...

I guess WTC7 looked pretty much the the same two days after collapse as it did right after it was brought down.I invite Readers to check the photos in post 135 just above and decide for themselves.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom