cogreslab said:
Wayne Morgan was in no way "in on this". A moment's reflection would tell you that the last thing he would want was to question the safety of cellphones!
Please, can't we discuss the scientific issues, which are of more importance than a case now six years old. Or is this just another diversionary tactic?
Thank you.
Let me explain a few things. Before I joined this forum, for quite some time I had been reading various posts, just for interest and amusement. This thread caught my eye for two reasons:
a) It was related to electromagnetics which is an area I am interested in.
b) It had some relation to biohazards of EM radiation which I am also interested in.
And so I watched with some interest because I AGREED with your initial premise that some potential biohazards of EM were being underestimated. That does NOT mean that I agree with your specific claims, just that I was sympathetic to your cause.
But as I watched the thread develop I became increasingly disturbed by the fundamental boo boo's you were making in basic physics. And it was your arrogance to Bill that finally prompted me to join in and comment.
At that point I thought you were a bit of a harmless crank. And I tried to discuss science with you. But look where that got me! You were never interested in any serious scientific discussion. Instead you just toss out the same tired propaganda and pseudoscience over and over again.
So then I started to seriously wonder what you were up to. Because in my experience when people falsely claim to be scientists there is usually an ulterior motive. And the more I find out about you, the less I like it. You are a scaremonger. You use the fear and ignorance of the lay public to promote yourself and also to promote the sale of highly suspect "protection" devices. And now I find out that you intentionally victimized an innocent man and deliberately and maliciously damaged his business to again promote yourself.
And before you deny that you didn't do that, you are on record as telling a newspaper that Wayne Morgan had told you that his sales had dropped by 30% by the time of the first pre trial review. And that's just the tip of the iceberg, we don't know what other damage you did after that.
It gets better. After all your bluster about how you were the VICTIM of a conspiracy, we now discover the truth - that you and others CONSPIRED to set up this mobile phone guy!
And who exactly ARE these others I wonder. I have a suspicion that at least one of them may have been the manufacturer of certain dubious "protective products". Any comment?
Then I find circumstantial evidence that seems to indicate that the tax payers of Wales are funding your schemes?! AND you are part of a political party seeking to influence the government of that region!!!!
And finally, we have the "Coghill Challenge", which is apparently an incitement to commit an act of child abuse in breach of worldwide experimental ethics and human rights. Now, I know it will never happen. But that isn't the point. You use this disgusting mechanism to SCARE the lay public into believing your BS and to promote yourself even further. A normal member of the public will never know that this "challenge" can never be performed, and they will think that you have "won" your case. That is fraud sir, pure and simple.
The deeper I look, the more outrageous it gets. No, this is no diversionary tactic, that is what YOU engage in, I do not stoop to your level.
I may have thought you were a harmless crank. I was wrong. You are dangerous Roger. And EVIL in my opinion. I sincerely hope that you DO get publicity, but not the publicity you want. The public need to be warned about people like you.
