• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Assistance request: meaning of FOTL, Sovereign Man, Moorish Law document motifs

Here's my next one. In a package of fairly conventional FOTLish documents I have encountered something new. It is an impressive looking certificate called a "Live Borne Record" from the "one heaven Great Register".

/QUOTE]

Could it be the "Embassy of Heaven"? I know they issue licence plates, passports etc. I remember hearing about them from the notorious Kent Hovind ("Dr Dino") tax evasion case.
 
Another question.

I am very interested in identifying the specific guru who is flogging some material I have under review. It's a not atypical sovereign man 'split myself into two' strategy, with UCC filings. I have located an exact duplicate of the documents online - exact same formatting, exact same contents - aside from some minor changes to 'Canadianize' the material. That duplicate is located here:

Somebody is selling this. Does anyone know who that might be?

I have found numerous variations on these materials, which leads me to suspect this thing has been cannibalized by other FOTLish gurus and their flock. One 'derivative' is reported in Szoo’ v. RCMP, 2011 BCSC 696. There are a couple amusing Moorish Law versions here:


Those Moors always cheer me up with their particular variations on these inanities.

Thanks once again for all your help!

Chaetognath


FOTL Loons versus The Mounties.
I Know Who I Am Betting On......
 
This is definitely a match! Not only do we have our '22 Books of Canon Law' but there's a very familiar spirograph logo. I had not run across this specific variant website - thank you BritPunk!

Chaetognath

They have a link to "7 Writs of the Apocalypse". Spotchecking through those writs, those dates have all just passed over the last two years. :eek:
 
Do you think it's intentional that article 42 is the meaning of life?
 
Back digging through the files...

This one is just for fun. I'm reviewing a huge fax of foisted agreement nonsense, but there's a fun declaration early on:

The Universal Postal Union (UPU) operates under the guise of the United Nations, and all treaties prior and current are deemed in force, in-fact.

...

Any pages stamped/postmarked indicate Universal Postal Union contract secured creditor for substantive due process & identification purposes.​

Sounds impressive, doesn't it? Perhaps this is another basis for the 'stamps on documents' motif. And yes, the authors stamped up many pages of their materials.

Equally impressive is the warning that:

Your “sovereign immunity”, and or any directly or indirectly related concept, does not exist for the purposes of this contract.​

Translated: You aren't a country. I said so.

But here's a novelty. The authors are claiming their "contract" should only be interpreted under UNIDROIT and UN CITRAL. At a glance those look like standard codes for international commercial transactions. Of course, that's a little silly when one is (A) in Canada and (B) asserting claims against all sorts of Canadian officials and entities.

The litigants have some fun fee schedule claims, including:

Ignorance of your Legal Maxims: $500,000.00 x 7 Counts ...​

Soon the courts will be quizzed on Black's Law Dictionary definitions, it seems. A kind of 'anti-game show'. The more incorrect answers, the more one wins!

Chaetognath
 
Oh my. I have just discovered the "Sovran Nations Embassies of Mother Earth":


All thanks to a notice from "The Tacit Supreme In Law Court" ordering the TD Bank and a Court Master to "Cease & Desist" in their attempts to serve a person associated with their organization.

Their document is mighty! I have not found a duplicate, but here are some analogous items from the same outfit:
Anyone had exposure to these folks? They seem to have their HQ in Montreal, but there is at least one other province that has a "Satellite Consulate Offices".

Chaetognath
 
Your “sovereign immunity”, and or any directly or indirectly related concept, does not exist for the purposes of this contract.​



See, that's the wonderful thing about "sovereign immunity". If I'm really sovereign, then it exists exactly when I say it does, no matter what anyone else says. If I lack the power to enforce that, then I'm not really "sovereign", am I?
 
See, that's the wonderful thing about "sovereign immunity". If I'm really sovereign, then it exists exactly when I say it does, no matter what anyone else says. If I lack the power to enforce that, then I'm not really "sovereign", am I?


Or as Forest Gump would put it, "Sovereign is as Sovereign does."

(I can't believe I sort-of quoted a Tom Hanks character.)

Chaetognath
 
Spent a little time last night digging on the "Sovran Nations Embassies of Mother Earth", and my goodness, they have a highly evolved form of stupid.

They seem to advance a weird combination of New Age, Sovereign Man, Moorish Law, and Aboriginal Primacy concepts, mashed together in the "Camel's Eye Treaty of 408":


But the movement seems to have undergone a schism, and may now be inactive. The controversy seems to flow from this document mailed out by "Sovran Signatory-Clan-Mother: MaryJane:Blackshear Monarch Matriarch of the Kanabosm Clan, The Most High Maiden Beholding The Power Of Life, Clerk Of The Divine Supreme In Law Tacit Court, Executive Administrator Ambassador, For The Sovran Unity Nations Embassy, Sovran Postmaster/Notary on The Land":


That letter led to a whole succession of denunciations of Mary Jane Blackshear AKA Sunson, as "The Isis a Pagan Goddess of a Pagan Religion", "White Buffalo Calf Woman" and "The Dragon Butterfly Woman". Apparently Isis/Calf Woman had sent that letter without consulting her ?peers? ?betters?:


I particularly like the last one, to "Ray C. Dams, O.I.T.C.", because look who that is:


The Sovran Nations Embassies of Mother Earth have also triggered interest in something of a parallel skeptic group, the "New Age Fraud" forum that resulted in some nice research by a group of aboriginal/First Nations activists into the spurious claims of the Sovran Nations Embassies. What's alarming is that a group this flaky was able to make some kind of inroads into the First Nations population with their absurd claims:


I have a suspicion this bunch is inactive or defunct. That's too bad, because their October 21, 2009 conference in Montreal sounded so promising, particularly the refreshments:

19:00 hours for the general public, light meal and Energized Water from our Quantum Physics department served from 18.30 Hours​

Energized with Orgone Energy, naturally. Just can't make this stuff up.

Chaetognath
 
Here's another. I have correspondence from a chap who is attempting to pay his bank debts with both a "Surety Bond" and a "Payment Bond". These were rejected by the bank. The litigant then complains that failure to accept these documents is contrary to the Bill of Exchanges Act, s. 152.3. But I think he means s. 152(3).

"Surety Bond" and "Payment Bond" are new to me. Any comments?

The same litigant also provides some fun name related language in his attempt to avoid association with his sorely tarnished Strawman:

It is agreed by you in your private capacity with no dispute coming from you that my name, [name in upper and lower case letters], is my private property; that I have never given permission or authority to any person, men or women to associate my name with a dead corporate entity; that the alteration of my name in any manner is fraud. [Emphasis in original.]​

In another package of documents, these regarding outstanding traffic tickets, he proclaims:

On all the Violation Tickets listed above my name is written as [name in upper case letters]. Thus, the policeman altered by name, [name in upper and lower case letters], for financial purposes without my informed consent. This constitutes fraud!​

Fraud! FRAUD!!!

Ahem.

Chaetognath
 
Apparently Isis/Calf Woman had sent that letter without consulting her ?peers? ?betters?:
Dont you just love their understanding of concepts?
A sovereign having peers and betters????:rolleyes:
 
Here's another. I have correspondence from a chap who is attempting to pay his bank debts with both a "Surety Bond" and a "Payment Bond". These were rejected by the bank. The litigant then complains that failure to accept these documents is contrary to the Bill of Exchanges Act, s. 152.3. But I think he means s. 152(3).


I think he means the Bills of Exchange Act.
 
My apologies - you are absolutely correct Mojo, but in this case the typos are mine rather than the FOTLer in question. Thank you.


Having Googled "Bill of Exchanges Act" and found that nearly all of the hits are FOTL-related, I assumed it was his.
 

Back
Top Bottom