• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Assistance request: meaning of FOTL, Sovereign Man, Moorish Law document motifs

Chaetognath

Scholar
Joined
Oct 15, 2011
Messages
90
Greetings Randi forum denizens!

I am conducting a review and analysis of documents associated with the Freeman-on-the-land, sovereign man, detaxer, and other 'state resistance' groups.

This exercise has detected a number of oddities for which I have found no explanation, and I would be very interested if anyone can explain the rationale or backstory to these elements, motifs, and statements. And I can't think of a better place to turn than this forum's members.

I will probably be posting a succession of these, but here is my first. I have a one page document prepared by a Canadian FOTL-ish person which bears an array of postage stamps. On its front it has a Canadian three cent postage stamp in the upper right and lower left corners. On its backside it also has two postage stamps of that same kind, positioned in the same locations.

There is a fifth postage stamp in the lower right corner of the front face that wraps around the page edge. This postage stamp has:

""WITHOUT PREJUDICE""​

written across it in blue ink. The double-quotes is how that phrase is written.

Below the wrap-around stamp is written in blue ink:

""COMMON-CORY""
""WITHOUT-RECOURSE""​

The document is a typically cryptic multicoloured FOTL unilateral foisted declaration of a fiduciary. It also includes the following:

I, [FOTL name] am also with the claim for position as the "Postmaster-General" for this document.​

The document is also formally notarized, and bears a nice red ink thumbprint.

I have at various points encountered FOTL-ish persons declaring themselves a postmaster or stating they hold a postmaster position, but I never have encountered an explanation of that.

I have also seen other documents with arbitrary postage stamps, but never an arrangement this complex. My guess on the postage stamps is that they are some mythical common-law notarization scheme.

Any comments?

Chaetognath
 
Here's my next one. This appears at the end of another foisted agreement. After a signature (text and handwritten) there is a line that includes, left to right:

For the,.

[a roughly one centimeter black/blue dot with the number 10 in it]

"With the Prejudice"​

I have never seen this 'dot number' motif before.

Any comments?

Chaetognath
 
The Postmaster General stuff might be related to this:

http://normanhinks.com/new/index.ph...99-understanding-the-executor-office-a-letter

Search on that page for "postmaster", and read backwards and forwards a bit from that point. He seems to think he can avoid paying taxes on estates if he places himself outside the US, and playing games with his mailing address accomplishes that.

Or something. As you might expect, it's all a bit insane and hard to follow.
 
The Postmaster General stuff might be related to this:

http://normanhinks.com/new/index.ph...99-understanding-the-executor-office-a-letter

Search on that page for "postmaster", and read backwards and forwards a bit from that point. He seems to think he can avoid paying taxes on estates if he places himself outside the US, and playing games with his mailing address accomplishes that.

Or something. As you might expect, it's all a bit insane and hard to follow.

Hmmmmmmmm.

Norman said:
Your first (lawful) act was putting your foot prints on your BC and after that you were in the world (legal, not lawful). The corporate state did not create the estate – the grantor did so with his footprints on the document. The Grantor continues to live and when he dies, there will be a Certificate of Death issued. The estate died and your father and finally you become the Executor in the Executor Office. You are an earthly estate walking around.

The Certificate of Birth or Live Birth Certificate is the Public Record of the Estate and that it is Probated. It is recognition by the World of the Grantor's [foot prints] Will.

I can't help noticing that there are no footprints on the published copy of President Obama's long form birth certificate...

Dave

ETA: Sorry for the derail, couldn't help myself.
 
Last edited:
Yep our old pal Mr Menard has claimed in a couple of you tube videos that placing a $1 stamp on a document and signing across it makes you a postmaster. And now you'r a postmaster, you have special legal powers.
I think it's in the A4V stuff, where he is "correcting" earlier "mistakes" when it didn't work as planned (!).
But sorry, old bean, fascinating as he is, I really don't think I could sit through it all again to find it.
 
There is a lot of significance made to different colours by FOTL brigade, with the use of various coloured papers and inks meant to signify some woo or other.
 
Chaetognath;8443321 [INDENT said:
""WITHOUT PREJUDICE"" [/INDENT]

written across it in blue ink. The double-quotes is how that phrase is written.

Looks like someone was told that quote marks are double apostrophes and got it wrong.
 
Is it on robin's egg blue paper?

Yes cos on the colour spectrum blue is the opposite of yellow.
Yellow paper is called a LEGAL pad, therefore blue is LAWFUL paper.
Makes sense when you think about it. ;)
 
why does this remind me of novels where people practice magic????



Because that's exactly their mindset. Take a look at some of the links provided earlier. On one page, he's saying that it's important that the red fingerprint not just be actual blood instead of red ink, but your actual blood, because your DNA is an essential part of the process. There's no way your DNA could have any real legal effect, it's purely there as an element of the magic he's trying to control. Without your DNA "essence" it will all fail!

And note that no matter how often they've failed, they keep coming back with just one more tweak....This time for sure! We just need Eye of Asian Newt, not that cheap European Newt Eye knock-off crap!
 
Looks like someone was told that quote marks are double apostrophes and got it wrong.

In this case I don't think so. This particular chap has a thing for doubled-up punctuation of many kinds. For example, he expresses his name in the 'dash colon' motif as follows:

::[firstname]-[middlename]: [lastname]::

Obviously that version will work better than the other common forms - more colons, more magic.

Chaetognath
 
Thanks for the Postmaster General suggestions. I have this mental synthesis, which is probably far too logical for these people, that runs like this:

1. if I correspond using the usual postal service procedures, that will mean I have entered into a contract with the state/court/somebody;

2. postmaster generals run the postal system as a common-law authority independent of the state;

3. if I am not only the author but the postmaster general for this document being delivered then I have not entered into a contract with the postal service that delivered the document; and

4. I'm still sovereign/freeman/etc.​

The author of the document in question was clearly aware of (or mimicking in a ritualistic manner) persons who think that use of a postal code means entering into a contract with the state, as he surrounded his postal code with square brackets.

Any other thoughts on this one are very welcome!

Chaetognath
 
Is it on robin's egg blue paper?


No. But I am pretty certain I have some in the files under review that have adopted a magic coloured paper approach. However, I think they came from Texas. So far I have not seen any Canadian examples of the robin's egg blue paper motif.

Chaetognath
 
why does this remind me of novels where people practice magic????


Horatius nailed it. And if you think this is strange, look for a video recording of an in-court performance by a Moorish Law proponent, or any Moorish Law materials. Those make even the most pretentious and dramatic freeman-on-the-land and sovereign men appear mundane.

Chaetognath
 
Thanks for the Postmaster General suggestions. I have this mental synthesis, which is probably far too logical for these people, that runs like this:

Isn't it far simpler than this? Freemen believe that the most fundamental aspect of a nation state is the maintenance of a mail service, therefore, by declaring themselves to be in charge of their own mail service, they declare themselves to be nation states.

Dave
 
That and some of the Canadian ones claim to be "allies" of Queen Elizabeth, which entitles them to the protection of certain Crown Servants (like the JAG, the Provost Marshal and the CF Chief Warrant Officer).
 

Back
Top Bottom