Merged Artificial Intelligence Research: Supermathematics and Physics

"Thought curvature", a possible path to Artificial General Intelligence?

ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Instead of blathering on absent evidence, it is pertinent that you perhaps demonstrate how I supposedly fail to present valid data.











Signature:
Click to expand...


Still waving around those books you can't read, are you?

It is not a lack of data I criticize but your lack of comprehension and understanding. You post without understanding.

But since you mention "data," you've not provided any either. Your opinions are not data.
 
Dave Rogers said:
Very precisely, if you confuse the aim of acquiring data with a superior ability for doing so.

Dave
Click to expand...

And where had I supposedly expressed of superior data acquisition ability, Dave?
You need to get into the state of mind, of presenting evidence for your claims. Please try to present evidence, for your next response.



Signature:
 
Dave Rogers said:
In the implications of your clearly implied suggestion that Dunning-Kruger should not apply to you for the reason that you display the former trait. For evidence, I refer you to your own words.

Dave
Click to expand...


And once more, where had I supposedly expressed of superior data acquisition ability, Dave?

Where had I clearly implied of superior data acquisition ability, Dave?

As I expressed prior, you need to train yourself, to present evidence for your claims, instead of non-evidenced blather.




Signature:
 
Dave Rogers said:
The evidence is in your posts. You, on the other hand, need to train yourself to stop pretending that nobody is capable of understanding context or subtext.

Dave
Click to expand...

There is no such evidence, of any superior data acquisition ability, as you so fervently claimed (absent evidence)

Ironically, contrasting evidence to your claim was clearly expressed (see source):

To spell it out: For example, I had expressed that I lacked particular knowledge gained (i.e insufficient data acquisition) by rapid experimentation (afforded by expensive gpus) in the machine learning context.

Given the spell out above, how does Dunning/Kruger supposedly apply?




Signature:
 
For those genuinely seeking information, see more details regarding the OP here.

A snippet/preview:
[IMGw=700]http://i.imgur.com/Z2D6oVd.png[/IMGw]




Signature:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One might think a aprogramming god could manage to format the width of images so as not to constantly **** up the page margins.
 
ferd burfle said:
One might think a aprogramming god could manage to format the width of images so as not to constantly **** up the page margins.
Click to expand...

He must be a back-end guy.

I'm tempted to post this every time he posts his wall-of-text image:

EJwE19t.png


I might just use the small version. People will know what I mean:

EJwE19tb.png
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
He must be a back-end guy.

I'm tempted to post this every time he posts his wall-of-text image:

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/EJwE19t.png[/qimg]

I might just use the small version. People will know what I mean:

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/EJwE19tb.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Why are you cross posting irrelevant images?

Don't you realize that the image from the other thread is different/disparate from the image posted in reply 36 of this thread?

What is the moderator to do with you now?



signature
 
Last edited:
ProgrammingGodJordan said:
Why are cross posting irrelevant images?

Don't you realize that the image from the other thread is different/disparate from the image posted in reply 36 of this thread?
Click to expand...

So what?

You are posting ignorant gibberish divorced from any scientific or philosophical framework. Creating a separate image highlighting the fact you're posting gibberish is hardly worth the trouble. Your gibberish doesn't deserve that much effort, minor though that effort may be.

ProgrammingGodJordan said:
What is the moderator to do with you now?
Click to expand...

One of the forum rules is to attack the argument, not the arguer. Violating that one can get you suspended or banned. The discussion of moderator rules was in part to highlight the fact that there are a few people here who are tempted to makes unflattering suggestions about your mental health and / or capabilities as part of the discussion, but cannot because of the forum rules. I think it's a good rule. I can call the ideas you've posted a rotting mass of fetid refuse without attacking you personally.
 
halleyscomet said:
So what?

You are posting ignorant gibberish divorced from any scientific or philosophical framework. Creating a separate image highlighting the fact you're posting gibberish is hardly worth the trouble. Your gibberish doesn't deserve that much effort, minor though that effort may be.



One of the forum rules is to attack the argument, not the arguer. Violating that one can get you suspended or banned. The discussion of moderator rules was in part to highlight the fact that there are a few people here who are tempted to makes unflattering suggestions about your mental health and / or capabilities as part of the discussion, but cannot because of the forum rules. I think it's a good rule. I can call the ideas you've posted a rotting mass of fetid refuse without attacking you personally.
Click to expand...

I repeat, why were you cross posting irrelevant images, and in doing so, failing to address this thread's OP?

Don't you realize that the image from the other thread is different/disparate from the image posted in reply 36 of this thread?

What shall the moderator to do with you now?

halleyscomet said:
He must be a back-end guy.

I'm tempted to post this every time he posts his wall-of-text image:

EJwE19t.png


I might just use the small version. People will know what I mean:

[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/EJwE19tb.png[/qimg]
Click to expand...



signature
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom