• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Another "Chi" demonstration

Hypernicus said:
That is what the "!" is there for, but you don't seem to know what the law of identity is. What it also means is humans never came from apes. Evolution is full of fallacies.
Click to expand...
Ohhhhkay. I guess you have to have every joke explained to you. Follow along carefully, I won't explain it again. (You don't seem to have understood alfaniner's careful explanation either but I'll try anyway.)

Here goes: I was making fun of the obscenities you felt you had to use in your post. Apes who do not have sex -- "non-****ing apes" -- do not have offspring. Now do you get it? =9_9= *shakes head sadly*

You're also repeating a very common falsehood. Evolution science DOES NOT claim that humans evolved from apes. Never has claimed that, either. It claims (and demonstrates quite clearly) that humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor.

In other words, the only fallacy is the one you just committed by mis-stating what evolutionary science claims. But you can't argue against the facts, so you just repeat a well-known falsehood that you can show to be false. This doesn't surprise me; it's a mistake made by just about all who are still in denial about the FACT -- not "theory" -- of evolution.

Next time, don't trot out a tired old argument that's been disproven over and over and over and over and over... 'kay?
 
Evolution science DOES NOT claim that humans evolved from apes.
Click to expand...
Apes/animals, no difference. Consciousness and instincts are two different things that can't coexist.

(and demonstrates quite clearly) that humans and apes evolved from a common ancestor.
Click to expand...
How is this demonstrated?

it's a mistake made by just about all who are still in denial about the FACT -- not "theory" -- of evolution. Next time, don't trot out a tired old argument that's been disproven over and over and over and over and over... 'kay?
Click to expand...
The arrogance of jumping to conclusions.
 
Hypernicus said:
Apes/animals, no difference. Consciousness and instincts are two different things that can't coexist.


How is this demonstrated?


The arrogance of jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...

Is this chemical process capable of perceiving?

Why isn't a triangle 180 degrees?
 
Hypernicus said:
Apes/animals, no difference.
Click to expand...
What a nonsensical statement. If the subset is equivalent to the aggregate, I look forward to the next time you order carrots and peas in a restaurant and are served pine needles. They're all plants, right? By your own logic you'll have no reason to complain, so eat up!

Consciousness and instincts are two different things that can't coexist.
Click to expand...
Support this ridiculous statement with evidence or it gets dismissed along with the rest.

How is this demonstrated?
Click to expand...
Follow the line and watch. Try a library. You'll want to bring along a pair of open eyes. Borrow if you must.

The arrogance of jumping to conclusions.
Click to expand...
Oh, dear! :-D Pittsburgh at its peak couldn't have produced such a massive chunk of irony.

Now how 'bout you answer Claus' questions, there's a good lad. Or lady.
 
Support this ridiculous statement with evidence or it gets dismissed along with the rest.
Click to expand...
Instinct is finished programmed
Consciousness presuppose free will

What is your nominalistic definitions?

Oh, dear! :-D Pittsburgh at its peak couldn't have produced such a massive chunk of irony.
Click to expand...
"Consciousness and instincts are two different things that can't coexist."
"Support this ridiculous statement with evidence or it gets dismissed along with the rest."

You hereby claim that human is willdetermined and have no free will. That is what all psychopaths do because no one can blame them for doing evil. This is not fantasy, we see it around the world, evil getting free even in USA by claiming them for insanity. Insanity as in the person did not do the act consciously and by his own free will. Some mystical (paranormal) force took over their body and shut down their consciousness.
 
Is this chemical process capable of perceiving?

Why isn't a triangle 180 degrees?

You should know, Hypernicus: I have more stamina than you.

Much more.

So...why not just simply answer the questions?
 
Hypernicus said:
Can you read Norwegian or have someone translate? I can copy and paste.
Click to expand...
I can read more languages than you will ever forget. However, I am not interested in other people's explanations. I want to hear how you answer the questions.

Here they are again:

Is this chemical process capable of perceiving?

Why isn't a triangle 180 degrees?

Knock yourself out. In any language you want.
 
Hypernicus said:
You hereby claim that human is willdetermined and have no free will. That is what all psychopaths do because no one can blame them for doing evil. This is not fantasy, we see it around the world, evil getting free even in USA by claiming them for insanity. Insanity as in the person did not do the act consciously and by his own free will. Some mystical (paranormal) force took over their body and shut down their consciousness.
Click to expand...
Pillory on acid.

By the way, it's not very polite to constantly call people psychopaths because they correct your scientifically and mathematically handicapped super gurus. Their childish philosophy is as well organized as the traffic they live in.
 
Hypernicus said:
I have said it before; those who can't make arguments are very poor at reasoning and thinking logical.
Click to expand...
I present for amusement value what seems to be your idea of reasoning and thinking logically.
Hypernicus said:
Instinct is finished programmed
Consciousness presuppose free will
Click to expand...
Wow, there's some solid "reasoning." =9_9= More nonsense and non-sequiturs.

Hypernicus said:
You hereby claim that human is willdetermined and have no free will. That is what all psychopaths do because no one can blame them for doing evil. This is not fantasy, we see it around the world, evil getting free even in USA by claiming them for insanity. Insanity as in the person did not do the act consciously and by his own free will. Some mystical (paranormal) force took over their body and shut down their consciousness.
Click to expand...
*shakes head sadly* If this is what you call "logic" than I'm a monkey's uncle. And I'm not.
 
Wow, there's some solid "reasoning." =9_9= More nonsense and non-sequiturs.
Click to expand...
Either something has free will or it hasn't. The way you answers just shows that you reject A==A, something is what it is and nothing else. Free will == instincts!. If animals had free will they could commit suicide which they never do, even when they are badly hurt or very near dying. They can't feel pain because that would assume they would have consciousness.

You still haven't defined the words. Are you chickening out?

*shakes head sadly* If this is what you call "logic" than I'm a monkey's uncle. And I'm not.
Click to expand...
Here it is. No arguments just statements from his own non-existent world. Read what he replies on and it is obviously he defends his likeness anytime. The definition of psychopath is that they think they have the right to sacrifice innocents; as in bullying, harassing, violently, stealing, raping etc. It is easy to see what the basis for all humans are regardless of what they do, and it is to achieve happiness and to avoid misery. If humans had no basis in life then everyone could do whatever they wanted to one another without consequences. Everyone acts to be in a more positive state it has nothing to do with survival which can be proven with 1 example and that is that man can (and have) commit suicide. Since humans have soul it is their body to own and no one has the right to harm it. Abortion hypocrisy thinks that fetus are humans. The definition as I have already said is to reason; thinking rational and logical. Fetus is just a body without a soul. The soul doesn't enter the body until it is ready. Whatever that is in the mother is their own property as the soul of the woman owns whatever is in her body she can do whatever she wants with the fetus, meaning abortion if she has to. Or else it would be murder. Murdering who? Fetus doesn't have a soul.
 
Hypernicus said:
..Since humans have soul it is their body to own and no one has the right to harm it. Abortion hypocrisy thinks that fetus are humans. The definition as I have already said is to reason; thinking rational and logical. Fetus is just a body without a soul. The soul doesn't enter the body until it is ready. Whatever that is in the mother is their own property as the soul of the woman owns whatever is in her body she can do whatever she wants with the fetus, meaning abortion if she has to. Or else it would be murder. Murdering who? Fetus doesn't have a soul.
Click to expand...
When is the soul usually ready to enter the body then? Can you kill any animal with no remorse since they have no soul? Why isn't a triangle 181.4 degrees?
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry, Hypernicus, you're throwing around a lot of words but saying little or nothing that makes sense. You're also claiming to be able to tell what I think, which you cannot. You are dismissed. Goodbye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom