dankeewolnir
New Blood
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2
Andrew Jackons "i killed the bank", and Debunking the Federal Reserve Conspiracy Theo
THE COMING BATTLE, THE TRUE HISTORY OF OUR NATIONAL DEBT, WALBERT 1899.
This book is a chronological history from the start of the country to 1899 when the book was written, full of quotes from the presidents, presidents of banks, circulars, public readings, senators, generals, congressional meetings, governors of the day to validity, the powers of controlling monetary policy. Baron Rothschild said himself, "give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes its laws." Nicolas Biddle, president of the United States Bank at the time of Jackson, the central bank with headquarters in London, said out of his own mouth what he would do if Jackson continued in his endeavors. Banks have always, just like today (but maybe not as publicly threatening, out of ignorance), brought the country to its knees if need be. The banks were audited, one time only, under Jackson, and it is documented the trickery the banks use to control all business and commerce...and everything else. There are quotes by the relevant people of the day, to verify CONCLUSIVELY, that not only did the banks cause the collapse/panics of 1811, 33, 37-41, 1873, 1893, etc (it is well documented, by non- tin hat wearers, of how the money supply was contracted, and other means of bringing the country to its knees--specifically and with warning by the banks), but it was intentional. It is hard to deny when the banks outright threaten...and it is so well documented. Our country did go to war over it several times with both sides (president of US and president of banks) acknowledging the reason being MONEY CREATION (Revolutionary -1812 -Civil War) We wont get into more recent wars. The country cant move without the banks say so, and I dont see how anyone could read this book, without looking at Ben Bernankes, Greenspan, etc. statements the in a different light, not to mention the notorious bailouts. It is profitable for a bank to lend money... end of story.
Money is a commodity, and the one that EVERYONE...EVERY ONE, uses...and it is susceptible to scarcity, and abundance, as any other commodity. The banks control this, with our current fiat system, in two ways: the actually creation of money, and the interest rates at which it is lended/borrowed. If I have 10 ears of corn, and i am the only one with corn, then its priced is sent at that. If over night someone comes and throws in 10x the amount of ears in my field, the value of corn is just cut exponentially. But imagine, not only controlling how much corn is in the field, but how much people need corn. If I go out and get rid of all other food, and the only thing left is starving people and corn, then I just made corn valuable again. This is creation, and interest rates basically. It is much easier to do with money than corn (espeically in a fiat system), but anybody arguing about a damn tombstone, is not only missing the point, but wasting valuable time. This is not a new game, and just because its not 20 years after the start of the country, and its not 1899, doesnt mean the same market rules arent at hand, and if you control money you control ALL.
The tombstone bit should not be used, as it cant easily be verified, so only aids in losing credibility. There is just way to much evidence to gain credibility, and do what is most important...drive home the point. ANDREW JACKSON DID KILL THE BANK, AS ANYONE CAN READ IN HIS FAREWELL ADDRESS. As well as many, many other quotes.
I also agree with the fact that it is not just the Central Bank... This is very deep, and in the end we can only blame ourselves. The people. Congress---next in line. But they are all bought off, just like the in Jackson's day. They found that out, as if they didnt know, conclusively after the much fought Audit in 1834, when President Jackson ordered the Secretary of Treasury, throughout the five government directories, to investigate its financial conditions. They demanded to inspect the banks books, and after denied access, they still were able to do so. I should point out that Jackson had to fire current treasurer William J, Duane, for refusing to do as told (he was on the banks side), and he was replaced by Attorney General Taney, who followed orders to the "T". They found who was being payed, how much etc... This is how Jackson was able to abolish the bank, by showing finally to everyone conclusively what was being done in the demise of the nation. Support HR1207 (Audit the FED), for this very reason. I cant believe we sit and argue petty points, missing how relevant this is to todays corruptions. It is very typical in these to, "STRAIN AT A GNAT, AND SWALLOW THE ELEPHANT". HEY EVERYONE SEE THAT PINK ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!!!!
THE COMING BATTLE, THE TRUE HISTORY OF OUR NATIONAL DEBT, WALBERT 1899.
This book is a chronological history from the start of the country to 1899 when the book was written, full of quotes from the presidents, presidents of banks, circulars, public readings, senators, generals, congressional meetings, governors of the day to validity, the powers of controlling monetary policy. Baron Rothschild said himself, "give me control of a nations money supply and I care not who makes its laws." Nicolas Biddle, president of the United States Bank at the time of Jackson, the central bank with headquarters in London, said out of his own mouth what he would do if Jackson continued in his endeavors. Banks have always, just like today (but maybe not as publicly threatening, out of ignorance), brought the country to its knees if need be. The banks were audited, one time only, under Jackson, and it is documented the trickery the banks use to control all business and commerce...and everything else. There are quotes by the relevant people of the day, to verify CONCLUSIVELY, that not only did the banks cause the collapse/panics of 1811, 33, 37-41, 1873, 1893, etc (it is well documented, by non- tin hat wearers, of how the money supply was contracted, and other means of bringing the country to its knees--specifically and with warning by the banks), but it was intentional. It is hard to deny when the banks outright threaten...and it is so well documented. Our country did go to war over it several times with both sides (president of US and president of banks) acknowledging the reason being MONEY CREATION (Revolutionary -1812 -Civil War) We wont get into more recent wars. The country cant move without the banks say so, and I dont see how anyone could read this book, without looking at Ben Bernankes, Greenspan, etc. statements the in a different light, not to mention the notorious bailouts. It is profitable for a bank to lend money... end of story.
Money is a commodity, and the one that EVERYONE...EVERY ONE, uses...and it is susceptible to scarcity, and abundance, as any other commodity. The banks control this, with our current fiat system, in two ways: the actually creation of money, and the interest rates at which it is lended/borrowed. If I have 10 ears of corn, and i am the only one with corn, then its priced is sent at that. If over night someone comes and throws in 10x the amount of ears in my field, the value of corn is just cut exponentially. But imagine, not only controlling how much corn is in the field, but how much people need corn. If I go out and get rid of all other food, and the only thing left is starving people and corn, then I just made corn valuable again. This is creation, and interest rates basically. It is much easier to do with money than corn (espeically in a fiat system), but anybody arguing about a damn tombstone, is not only missing the point, but wasting valuable time. This is not a new game, and just because its not 20 years after the start of the country, and its not 1899, doesnt mean the same market rules arent at hand, and if you control money you control ALL.
The tombstone bit should not be used, as it cant easily be verified, so only aids in losing credibility. There is just way to much evidence to gain credibility, and do what is most important...drive home the point. ANDREW JACKSON DID KILL THE BANK, AS ANYONE CAN READ IN HIS FAREWELL ADDRESS. As well as many, many other quotes.
I also agree with the fact that it is not just the Central Bank... This is very deep, and in the end we can only blame ourselves. The people. Congress---next in line. But they are all bought off, just like the in Jackson's day. They found that out, as if they didnt know, conclusively after the much fought Audit in 1834, when President Jackson ordered the Secretary of Treasury, throughout the five government directories, to investigate its financial conditions. They demanded to inspect the banks books, and after denied access, they still were able to do so. I should point out that Jackson had to fire current treasurer William J, Duane, for refusing to do as told (he was on the banks side), and he was replaced by Attorney General Taney, who followed orders to the "T". They found who was being payed, how much etc... This is how Jackson was able to abolish the bank, by showing finally to everyone conclusively what was being done in the demise of the nation. Support HR1207 (Audit the FED), for this very reason. I cant believe we sit and argue petty points, missing how relevant this is to todays corruptions. It is very typical in these to, "STRAIN AT A GNAT, AND SWALLOW THE ELEPHANT". HEY EVERYONE SEE THAT PINK ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM!!!!