bob_kark
Person of Hench
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 4,488
When did I mention government plot straw man?
Whose sock puppet are you?
When did I mention government plot straw man?
He han't had a trial so I don't know.
<snip>
Have you not heard of innocent til proven guilty?
Your making it seem like I thought they fell faster than gravity when in fact I was saying the opposite as you well know.
If you want to play these games you will lose.
I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"
Put FBI and osama into google
Docker, I think puppies and beer-pong are nice too, but I'm not starting threads about them.I said the essay was nice.
Docker, I think puppies and beer-pong are nice too, but I'm not starting threads about them.
What was your point? Do you have anything to add to the "essay"? Do you agree with it? Do you not agree with it? If so, why? What parts?
What was your purpose in starting this thread?
... So basically act like a troll.So he can call people "straw man" and he can ask "when did I say that?"
... So basically act like a troll.
I said the essay was nice.
If you want to play these games you will lose.
He han't had a trial so I don't know.
I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"
When did I mention government plot straw man?
source?
You see, these loonies have somehow concocted the idea that the missile which hit the pentagon was not a missile at all, but one of the hijacked planes. And to prove this unlikely premise, they point to a propaganda statement from the Bush regime, which rather stupidly claims that all but one of the people aboard the plane were identified from the site by DNA testing, even though nothing remains of the plane. The plane was vapourized by the fuel tank explosion maintain these space loonies, but the people inside it were all but one identified by DNA testing.
Docker (from another thread) said:Was the Pentagon hit by a plane? Yes
If the tapes of osama confessing his involvement were evident enough for you, then why hasn't the FBI use the tapes as evidence to prove Osama's guilt and have him indicted?
By now they would list him as most wanted for the 9/11 attack, but it appear that they haven't yet done so.
The confession tape released by pentagon sometime in december 2001 came right after top officials from soveriegn government began to express doubts to the US of osama's involvement and asked for evidence.
Not in this confession tape. It's clear as day.Proof that the tape is not Osama?
Oh yeah, in a couple shots he looks "different"
If I make a tape confessing to a crime, my lawyer will simply say that I was joking, deluded, etc. However, when a known terrorist makes a tape confessing to an act of terrorism, and says more is on its way, I submit that he should be taken seriously. Do you agree?If the tapes of osama confessing his involvement were evident enough for you, then why hasn't the FBI use the tapes as evidence to prove Osama's guilt and have him indicted? By now they would list him as most wanted for the 9/11 attack, but it appear that they haven't yet done so.
I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"
Put FBI and osama into google
He han't had a trial so I don't know.
Just an aside, I'm getting really sick of the "Just Asking Questions" routine. It's pretty obvious that Docker believes that the government was involved. He continually just asks questions (JAQs off) so that he can never be held accountable to back up any specific claim. Case in point, this thread: he copies and pastes a post from another forum and simply states it's "nice". No opinon. No agreement or disagreement. No way to back himself into a corner.
Docker. Grow a backbone and stop "JAQing" off. if you want to discuss 9/11 then do it. Until then you are looking more and more foolish every post you make (which works out to looking more foolish about every 5 minutes or so)
If the tapes of osama confessing his involvement were evident enough for you, then why hasn't the FBI use the tapes as evidence to prove Osama's guilt and have him indicted? By now they would list him as most wanted for the 9/11 attack, but it appear that they haven't yet done so.