• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

A nice essay

Docker said:
So why was the air coming out 20 storeys below the destruction? Why random windows, the force would be enough to blow every window out?
Click to expand...

Not necessarily what's going on. The air pressure would probably be applied evenly to all windows on a floor or in a room, so windows with damage to them from heat or other debris would break first. As the air escaped out those windows, it gets to a point where the rest of the air trying to escape encounters less resistance in the open space where the windows were and leaves that way, and the remaining pressure isn't strong enough to break any more windows.
 
Docker, are you going to take a stance on anything? Do you believe there were explosives? Do you think a missle hit the pentagon? Do you think WTC7 was CDed? What?
 
Garb said:
That is the idea of the "squbs seen during the collapse."

What is the reason for the squibs if it wasn't air? How is this an indicator of a government plot?
Click to expand...

When did I mention government plot straw man?
 
Garb said:
Docker, are you going to take a stance on anything? Do you believe there were explosives? Do you think a missle hit the pentagon? Do you think WTC7 was CDed? What?
Click to expand...

Ofcourse he isn't. Standard CT nutter tactic. Repeating what other nutters are saying, and when that gets debunked or questioned, he can hide behind the fact that he never made that statement.

Like, he's just asking questions, man.
 
Docker said:
When did I mention government plot straw man?
Click to expand...

The fact you keep on saying Osama didn't do it and how all of this stuff the government did is a lie. That counts as a government plot.

Oh and way to misquote me again. That is good enough for a report.
 
Redtail said:
Where on thier website? Could you post a link to this info?
Click to expand...

I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"

Put FBI and osama into google
 
Docker said:
You said no controlled demolition, so you would need to look at them all.
Click to expand...

Asking for proof of a negative is generally considered a logical fallacy. All you have to do is show one controlled demolition, outside of the situation in question, that does use them to prove the argument wrong. Get to it.
 
Docker said:
When did I mention government plot straw man?
Click to expand...

Isn't that implied by the essay you thought was "nice" and decided to post here when it claims that Muslims terrorists weren't responsible and Bush is a traitor?

What's the point of it then if not that?
 
Garb said:
The fact you keep on saying Osama didn't do it and how all of this stuff the government did is a lie. That counts as a government plot.

Oh and way to misquote me again. That is good enough for a report.
Click to expand...

I didn't misquote you, you said it. I'll remove it if you take out your miisquote.

Run to the moderators.

When did I say osama didn't do it, straw man?
 
Docker said:
I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"

Put FBI and osama into google
Click to expand...

How hard is it to post a link when you made the claim?

You'd make us post a link if we made a claim.
 
Docker said:
I didn't misquote you, you said it. I'll remove it if you take out your miisquote.

Run to the moderators.

When did I say osama didn't do it, straw man?
Click to expand...

So Osama did do it? Yes or no?
 
Docker said:
I didn't misquote you, you said it. I'll remove it if you take out your miisquote.

Run to the moderators.

When did I say osama didn't do it, straw man?
Click to expand...

The thread. You put it on here, you thought it was nice, and we all know you agreed with it. And yes, you misquoted me, making it seem like I thought Osama is insane and was looking for attention.


You really are that moronic aren't you?
 
Docker said:
I'm not doing your research for you, as you clearly haven't bothered to do any. Your idea of research is saying: "Gravy what should my opinion be today?"

Put FBI and osama into google
Click to expand...

So you can't back it up? Funny, THe Person who claimed the same thing on the UM boards couldn't link it to the FBI site either.
 
Last edited:
Docker, if you don't agree with anything in this essay then why did you post it?

If you do agree with the essay, with what parts specifically?

You seem to be confusing everyone with what claims you're actually making, so now would be a good time to clear up what, exactly, your point is.
 
Garb said:
The thread. You put it on here, you thought it was nice, and we all know you agreed with it. And yes, you misquoted me, making it seem like I thought Osama is insane and was looking for attention.


You really are that moronic aren't you?
Click to expand...

Your making it seem like I thought they fell faster than gravity when in fact I was saying the opposite as you well know.

If you want to play these games you will lose.
 
dirtywick said:
Docker, if you don't agree with anything in this essay then why did you post it?

If you do agree with the essay, with what parts specifically?

You seem to be confusing everyone with what claims you're actually making, so now would be a good time to clear up what, exactly, your point is.
Click to expand...

I said the essay was nice.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom