Hercules56
Banned
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2013
- Messages
- 17,176
With an argument like that, one sorta has to wonder whether you are intent upon claiming that coups and autocoups are simply impossible or trying to argue that we should be assuming that they're effectively impossible. "It Can't Happen Here!"
It also looks like it's little more than an attempted diversion and distraction from the issues of legitimacy, because you really have nothing to stand on when it comes to the things that were actually raised. Hence the attempted appeal to some magical invulnerability and incorruptability of the system. Hence the attempted dismissal as fantasy of the hypothetical that illustrated the nature of what you actually argued and why it's problematic, rather than actually dealing with such.
Also, "Constitution, so shut up" makes for a pretty terrible argument when you've shown yourself perfectly willing to utterly ignore the Constitution when it suits you.
When have I utterly ignored the Constitution?
