wtc collapse

How many of you were aware of the fact that buckling was actually a major factor in the collapse of the World Trade Center? From a layman's point of view, you'll likely say "well duh, of course it buckled, that's how it fell on itself, silly!" And this is why it's very dangerous to be a layman...

I tried to use the search feature and couldn't find anything... Is there a definitive analysis of her math, anywhere, or just bits and pieces? http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/BilliardBalls.html Appendix A I mean, her opening calculation ...is incredibly bizarre. Essentially she states that...

I've pretty much given up having an opinion on 9/11 now, but something always struck me as interesting, and, a question I was never able to get an answer from a conspiracy theorist: "Who would build a huge building so that it fell sideways, and NOT into its own footprint? The architects would...

In this thread gravy will elaborate on the following: Jessicarabbit: I would like to see your analysis of the total collapse after initiation please gravy. Gravy: Millions of pounds of building fell, destroying the structure below. Gravy mentions papers by Bazant and Greening. I would like...

jessicarabbit is dissatisfied with the papers I referred her to Gravy: Why would you ask a tour guide for a scientific analysis of the collapse of the towers? You've already been referred to Bazant & Zhou (2001), Bazant (2006), Greening (2005-6). Your refutation of their work? Your experts...

If you've got it, post it here. I reiterate OBJECTIVE evidence only, and remember; explosives cause explosions, but not all explosions are caused by explosives. I await the evidence.

Consider this picture: http://s18.photobucket.com/albums/b108/janedoe444/ARG/Image231.jpg Observe that the expulsions of smoke and debris are occurring well below the main collapse front. It has been suggested by OCTs that floor assemblies are falling ahead of the main collapse. These falling...

I like this little piece, it's by batsrus in LC. It sums up the way truthers feel about the nuts very nicely: "The tower fell in a time almost identical to that of a free-falling object, dropped from that height, meaning that it's physically impossible for it to have collapsed by the method...

As anybody seen these? Who is this "mmmlink"? And if you look at his/her subscribers at youtube, you get... a certain Truthseeker. I dare you to look at his myspace page. "World Can't Wait", skeptigirl?

Look at this simple gravity driven collapse. The steel simply weakened. There are no explosions involved. The concrete wasn't turned to dust. Now as an analogy look at this posterior. It is certainly not an elbow and has no characteristics of an elbow...