I'm curious why you find this silly?
Because cats are not humans. Saying we shouldn't do something to a cat because we wouldn't do it with a woman is ridiculous. We do all
kinds of things with cats that we don't do with women. Like made medical decisions for them without their consent, or decide who they should be allowed to breed with (
if we decide to allow them to breed), or, y'know,
owning them.
Really? You don't see a difference between a cat and a person? Do you consider cat ownership to be slavery, then? Do you think cats should be allowed to vote?
Or are you selectively choosing when to equivocate between cats and humans based solely on when it works for your argument?
Imagine that you sunning yourself on the front lawn of the place you live in and someone comes along and puts a bullet in you. And nobody cares because you were just a cat!
Except that isn't what welshdean said at all. Saying that ten years is an excessive punishment is not the same thing as saying the crime doesn't matter because the victim was just a cat.
Yeah, we do treat them differently and I've never understood why.
Because they're not humans. Things which are different get treated differently. We also don't expect them to obey laws about jaywalking, or to pay taxes. Equivocating between cats and humans is ridiculous. If there's a reason why we shouldn't do a certain thing to cats, then that argument needs to be based on something other than "because we wouldn't do it to a human."
If I ran the zoo people that murder animals for fun would be treated exactly the same as a person that kills people for fun.
Exactly the same.
If you ran a zoo, wouldn't you be the equivalent of a slave owner? Or, again, does the equivalency between humans and other animals only apply when it supports your argument?
Because they are living things with their own personalities and feelings. Often they are superior in their personalities to people. I've known way more pets that I like than actual humans.
But why ten years? Why that figure? Is that the minimum of time necessary to rehabilitate an animal killer? Is there any objective reasoning behind that number?
And why isn't "get evaluated by a psychiatrist" part of your proposed punishment for animal killers? Isn't harming animals usually a sign of some kind of mental illness?
Humans, in general, are pretty terrible. Cats, on the other hand, are usually pretty awesome.
That depends on who you ask, and thus isn't a good basis for laws.
Thank you. It is nice to know some people think putting bullets into cats in front of someone's house is a horrible thing.
Be honest: did you start this thread to have a discussion about animal cruelty and what should be done about it, or because you wanted people to validate your rage?