• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

perhaps of interest

cnorman18

Critical Thinker
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
304
So I'm over on a Christian forum, trying to get a little respect for Judaism, and having about as much success as I am here (the subject being why Jews don't believe in Jesus), when a guy I'll call S***** comes on with the first of a series of truly horrifying posts.

This guy believes in the International Jewish Conspiracy. He believes that Jews worship Satan. He even believes the Blood Libel--that Jews commit ritual murder and drink the blood of Christian children as a sacrament.

Now I've been posting on various boards for maybe ten years, and I've dealt with a lot of antisemites, but this is the first time I've seen that.

After ten pages of posts, this my latest--a bit of perspective, perhaps, on why I get so irritated when people mistake me for a Christian or say there is no difference:

------

There is a reason besides Scriptural interpretation that more Jews don't become Christians, and it's worth considering. It looms rather large in the minds of many Jews whenever the subject comes up.

As I posted earlier:

"Even if your way IS the right one, can you understand how hard it is for Jews to listen to those who tell us to abandon and betray everthing that has sustained us and helped us to survive as we have for almost 4.000 years, in favor of a system of belief that makes no sense to us and seems contrary to some of the most basic tenets of our faith?

"Is there any intellectual argument, any logic of history, any proof text, any Biblical insight, any line of reasoning, any words from any authority figure, even from your own faith, that could convince you to spit on the Cross, admit that Jesus did not rise from the dead, give up Heaven, throw away the entire New Testament, laugh at Christian martyrs as fools, and turn your back on your spiritual ancestors of two thousand years? Is there anything at all that could convince you to do that?"

Especially if the people trying to convince you had a history of murdering, torturing, burning, banishing and harassing your people for almost as long?

We're not just talking Bible verses and theology here. History has a voice, too.

Think on that for a moment. I personally know an elderly Jewish woman who shudders and crosses the street to avoid walking in front of a Christian church. The sight of a cross makes her frown blackly, and sometimes she spits on the ground.

She has a very good reason; in her childhood in Eastern Europe, the Christians would beat Jews and occasionally kill them (with no official consequences) if they caught one too near their house of worship. They thought their presence a contamination.

She stays indoors on Easter, trembling in fear with the blinds closed and the doors locked, for a similar reason; in her home town, gangs of Christians would roam the streets on Good Friday and Easter Sunday, looking for Jews to punish for killing their Savior. Easter Jew-murders were rather common, and punishments for them rare; none of the Christian officials in the town thought it much of a problem.

Now: How ready is she, do you think, to listen to Christians preach to her about how Christianity is the only true religion, the way of Righteousness and
Peace and Love?

This was in Poland. Similar things happened in Russia--and I hate to be the one to tell you, but they still do. The Russian Orthodox Church still turns a blind eye to, or even tacitly encourages, the worst and most vicious kinds of Jew-hatred--and we have seen it promoted on this very board.

Those things don't happen much in Poland any more. Virtually all of the Polish Jews are dead. Other than the few that escaped to America and Israel, they went into the gas chambers and the ovens. Out of more than 5 million Polish Jews before the war, there were only 50.000 left at war's end.

Germany and Poland were both overwhelmingly Christian nations. If the Holocaust was not the fault of Christians, then who? You were the only ones there. WE didn't do it.

Do you really think Christianity is going to have much appeal for us anytime soon?

Your response, no doubt, will be "I had nothing to do with that."

Your faith did. Explicitly, deliberately, and as a matter of formal teaching and doctrine, for centuries. You have seen it on this very thread--and some others of you have preached a milder form of it yourselves.

The teaching that Judaism is obsolete, that now that Christ has come there is no more need for the Jews, that God is done with them and that all Jews should immediately become Christians, led directly--DIRECTLY--to mass murder on an absolutely unprecedented scale, just as it has led to mass murder on a smaller scale at frequent intervals for well over a thousand years.

The protest that "those were not true Christians" is a plain falsehood. The doctrine that the Jews killed Christ, that Jews practiced ritual murder and drank the blood of Christian children, poisoned wells and caused the Black Death, and much more, were universally taught and believed by ALL Christians till only a few hundred years ago--and were still widespread in Europe at the turn of the 20th century, and are still believed by some today. The idea that Judaism is over, now that Christ has come, is probably in your own mind and heart, and that is a very large piece of the problem; maybe the biggest.

You have never seen anything from the point of view of a Jew. You have no clue how Christianity looks from inside the synagogue.

When the basketball team at the private Jewish school where I taught for some years was about to play the team from a nearby Catholic school, our campus rabbi was horrified to learn the name of their team; it was the "Crusaders." He was absolutely furious, outraged. "Why don't we call our team the 'Jesus-Killers,' then?" he roared.

Do you know why he was so upset?

The Crusaders of the Middle Ages, on their way to the Holy Land, would often--very often--stop and casually massacre whole villages of peaceful, virtually unarmed Jews--men, women, children, the aged, infants in arms--and burn their towns to the ground, leaving nothing behind but corpses and smoldering rubble. Hundreds of villages, thousands of corpses. It was one of the worst times in Jewish history. We do not have admiring thoughts about brave men in shining armor when we hear the name "Crusader." We think of laughing cowards who made a game of throwing Jewish infants in the air and catching them on their spears--and raping their mothers as they watched their babies impaled.

All wearing the Crusaders' cross over their armor, of course.

Did you even know that?

That sort of thing happened regularly, all over Europe, all over the Mideast, for most of Western history. The Inquisition you have heard of; the Chelminitzki massacres you probably have not. Google them sometime, but don't do it after you've eaten.

And then we come to the most educated, the most religiously sophisticated, the most cultured and technologically advanced nation of its day; the center of Christian scholarship and of classical art and music, a thoroughly modern industrialized society, with a free and democratic system of government and an independent free press, where Jews were more accepted in society and more successful and secure than at any time until present-day America.

Germany in 1930.

When I was in seminary, I read a book by a Methodist scholar that affected me deeply. It was Franklin Littell's The Crucifixion of the Jews. In it, Littell says that the Holocaust is the great unhealed wound of the Christian faith. To this day, the fact that the most hideous crime in human history was perpetrated by Christians, as other Christians looked on and did nothing, has never been addressed by the Christian church or by the Christian community as a whole.

Forgive? Jews do not believe that even God can forgive a crime against another human. Only the injured have the the right to forgive the injury. Forgiveness for the Holocaust must be asked of the six million. Neither I, nor any Jew living, has the right to give it.

And how can there be forgiveness where there is no repentance? To this day, the Christian church has never acknowledged ANY responsibility for the Holocaust or for complicity in it. And before you say it had none, read what Martin Luther had to say about the Jews. Founder of the Protestant Reformation--and a good German in every way. Don't pretend otherwise; the camps were run, guarded, administered and engineered by good Catholics, Lutherans, Orthodox and Calvinists.

Littell also said that any Christian who looks at the murder of two-thirds of the Jews of Europe and at the literal rebirth of the two-millenia-dead nation of Israel after three years (cf. "three days") and does not think of Crucifixion and Resurrection isn't paying attention.

God is not finished with the Jews. The Old Covenant has not been revoked. We still have a place in the Divine Plan, and as Jews, not as ought-to-be-Christians.

Yes, it is true that some Jews have become Christians. That has always happened. How do we feel about that? For the most part, OK. People can believe as they like, and go in peace. But there is a bit of history there, too.

In earlier generations, Jews converted at sword's point, or in the shadow of the stake, or on the rack with red-hot irons poised over their genitals. "Come to Jesus" had a slightly different tone then. Some chose baptism over torment and death, and we understood. Peace to them, and we let them go.

But very, very many Jews refused. The great rabbi Akiva has been cited here as a source for Messianic quotes; do you know how he died? He was wrapped in a Torah scroll and burned alive, with a roll of wet wool over his heart to keep him alive in the flames as long as possible. He had been forbidden to teach Torah, and refused to stop.

I fudge on the kosher laws quite often; many Jews do. I often eat unkosher meat, and sometimes I even "don't want to know" if there's milk or cheese in a meat dish.

But I won't eat pork.

In the concentration camps--and though you have heard the names of only a few, there were literally thousands of them all over Europe--there was very little food. The Nazis had carefully calculated the precise number of calories that would allow them to extract the last bit of labor from their prisoners while starving them to death. A typical day's ration would be a half-cup of watery spoiled-vegetable broth and a quarter of a raw turnip.

But every year, on Yom Kippur--when observant Jews do not eat or drink at all--the Nazis would treat the prisoners to sumptuous feasts; fat, juicy sausages, thick slabs of roasted meat, ribs and chops and steaks, served with bread, vegetables, fruits and all the trimmings.

All pork, of course.

It was a deliberate bit of humiliation, and it was considered great fun when the starving Jews ate the forbidden meat on their holiest day, a day of prayer and fasting.

Now the rabbis in the camps would eat the food themselves, to show the people that it was all right; there is almost no Commandment that cannot be broken to save a human life.

But there were some that would not eat on Yom Kippur. They would rather die. And they did.

As the well-fed Christian guards watched and laughed.

All through our history, there have been Jews commanded to eat pork, with knives to their throats or guns to their heads, and they would not; and they died. There are other meats as unkosher as pork, but for whatever reason, pork has become a symbol of forbidden food for Jews, both to us and to our enemies.

Eat pork willingly? How could I? When so many who came before me laid down their lives before they would eat it, in token of their faith?

Some have asked why a Jew is allowed to be an atheist and yet remain a Jew--but a Jew who confesses faith in Jesus is not. This is why.

Do not blame us. Blame the Christians who tried to force us to baptism for centuries with dungeon, fire and sword.

Jesus himself talked about this, you know. Something about those who would not enter in, but allowed no one else to enter, either. Who did you think he was talking about? Jews?

Do you not know that those phony preachers on TV actually drive people away from your faith? Why do you tolerate them in silence?

How much more have my people been driven away?

A Jew who follows Jesus is free to do so, and peace be upon him; but he is no longer one of us. When so many of us had molten lead poured down their throats as the alternative to baptism, how should we feel about one who takes the side of the pourers?

Jesus was never our enemy. We think Jesus was a very nice guy, if a little misguided. But don't ask if we think Christians have been our enemies. History will have an answer for you.

Is anyone here ashamed?

Why not?

S***** has been spreading the most vicious and evil kind of antisemitic excrement on this very thread. Did YOU respond to it?

Few did. Most just pretended he wasn't there--"nothing to do with ME or MY faith." A few Christians spoke out against him--two? three?-- but who has been most vocal? Myself--and a professed atheist!

Where were the Christians?

We asked that same question from 1933 till 1945. Where were the Christians?

Has anything changed?

Did YOU have anything to say when you saw Jews accused of Christ-killing, Satan worship, ritual murder, and religious cannibalism, right here before your very eyes?

Why should I believe you'd have done anything if you saw Jews being loaded into trucks and cattle cars? Millions of your fellow Christians didn't.

"You dare to equate not posting something to a nut on the Internet with complacency in the face of the Holocaust?"

Damn right.

If you can't be bothered to post a rebuke to literally Satanic hatred from the anonymity of your keyboard, why would anyone think you would have the stones to face down men with guns? Fat chance.

(Yes, a very, very few did; and of them you may be proud. But do not pretend that they were more than a tiny, brave minority. If ALL the Christians had stood up, Hitler could have murdered no one at all.)

When Christians, as Christians, have something to say to Jews on the order of "Yes, we did all this to your people, and we did it for centuries, and we did it in Jesus's name, and it was horribly wrong, and we are sorry," then Jews will have a reason to listen.

But to sit on top of a mountain of Jewish skulls and ignore it, and preach to us about what WE have to do to go to Heaven--

Words fail me.

Maybe these:

"Take the beam out of your own eye before you try to take the speck out of your brother's."

Oh, yes, and this:

"By their fruits ye shall know them."

What do the "fruits" of Christianity look like, do you suppose, to a Jew?

If you read the foully evil fulminations of S***** and posted nothing, you have no right whatever to complain about this post.

None.

At.

All.

Have you denied Jesus before men with your silence?

What will you do now?

Repent--or attack?
 

I hate that response. Why even bother to post at all? If you're going to be lazy enough to not read a post, just be consistant - be lazy enough to not reply to the post, too.

-----

cnorman18, I respect your beliefs and opinions; this S***** (gee, that name sounds familiar) person is a s*******. Unfortunately, lunatics like S***** are out there, and are very much a danger to everyone (not just themselves).

Unfortunately, your post seems primarily aimed at Christians. And while I'd say that Jews certainly have every right to be angry and upset at Christianity as a whole, I'm not sure your post is going to get much notice here - at a primarily non-Christian site. I, for example, am a deist Pagan. Ryokan is just one of several Buddhists. And, of course, there's all those atheists running amok... I'm afraid most of us are standing off to one side, hoping all you warring theists don't get us killed in your squabbles.

I do have a question, though - in your belief system, do you hold that the tribes of Israel are the only chosen people of God? And does this mean that you can only be a Hebrew through genetics, or can you become Jewish through marriage, or through the conscious decision to follow the Jewish faith? I'm just curious - I know what many other Jews have said on this topic, and I find it fascinating, but I always want to hear more.

(Whether your side or the Christians are right, I'm going to hell anyway. :D )

Ryokan - you should apologize for being rude. Just sayin'...
 
Your response, no doubt, will be "I had nothing to do with that."

cnorman, I want to start by saying that I have really enjoyed your posts on this forum. It's been a delight to see the pro-religious faith side argued by an intelligent rational individual.

This post was particularly eloquent and I understand it was directed to Christians on a different forum, not those on this board.

However, if the response of "I had nothing to do with that" isn't a reasonable response from a person who wasn't even born when the attrocities you are discussing, what is? What would you like to hear in response to such tales?

This isn't, by the way, a rhetorical question. Similar arguments have been made in regard to slavery and treatment of blacks in the U.S. But I am not responsible for the actions of my ancestors, whether they be slave-owners or nazi's (and as far as I can tell, they were neither). Am I supposed to apologize for being born into a race/nation/religion that had such a history? Do you want an apology for what they did? Am I just supposed to offer sympathy and understanding? What response are you looking for when you relate such tales? Sorrow and horror at such atrocities I can easily offer, but shame or repentance? Why should I apologize for or be ashamed of the actions of others that happened long before I was born?

You mentioned that you were raised Christian. Have you ever apologized to other Jews for what others of the same nominal faith you were raised in did decades or centuries ago?
 
However, if the response of "I had nothing to do with that" isn't a reasonable response from a person who wasn't even born when the attrocities you are discussing, what is? What would you like to hear in response to such tales?

Beyond that -- the fact that the acts you despise were committed by Christians does not make them "Christian" acts. This is the "Hitler liked dogs" argument; the fact that someone with some trait has committed a reprehensible act does not mean that other who share the trait share the responsibility.

I'd be willing to bet that most if not all of the concentration camp guards you wrote about liked chocolate chip cookies, too. I like chocolate chip cookies. Does that mean that I should apologize to you on behalf of all chocolate-chip-cookie-likers throughout history?

I am college-educated. So was Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb. Does this mean that I, and other college graduates world-wide, share responsibility with him for putting millions of people in fear of nuclear annihiliation?

Some of my ancestors were English. Should I apologize to prostitutes for the fact that a fellow Englishman named "Jack the Ripper" carved a dozen or so up in the late 1800s? Or can I simply point out that there are lots of Englishmen and some are nicer than others?
 
cnorman18,

If the Holocaust and numerous others atrocities inflicted on the Jewish people you cited were despicable acts of collective punishment for alleged crimes perpetrated by people who lived long ago, such as the execution of Jesus, and if those acts are morally reprehensible, then is it not equally reprehensible to ask for group repentance from all Christians for something they didn't do themselves?

How is one from of collective punishment wrong in principle but the other right?

I have little doubt that Christian dogmas of the early 20th century exacerbated ethnic and religious conflict, and that the Catholic Church in particular was, at best, willfully ignoring the ongoing problems, but it does not follow that all Christians are responsible for those and other acts.
 
--

I hate that response. Why even bother to post at all? If you're going to be lazy enough to not read a post, just be consistant - be lazy enough to not reply to the post, too.

---

Funny, I was just thinking that.

---

cnorman18, I respect your beliefs and opinions; this S***** (gee, that name sounds familiar) person is a s*******. Unfortunately, lunatics like S***** are out there, and are very much a danger to everyone (not just themselves).

Unfortunately, your post seems primarily aimed at Christians. And while I'd say that Jews certainly have every right to be angry and upset at Christianity as a whole, I'm not sure your post is going to get much notice here - at a primarily non-Christian site. I, for example, am a deist Pagan. Ryokan is just one of several Buddhists. And, of course, there's all those atheists running amok... I'm afraid most of us are standing off to one side, hoping all you warring theists don't get us killed in your squabbles.

Though there were several aspects of this I thought might be of interest, I thought it especially noteworthy that the two who took most of a stand were myself and an atheist.

I've been saying for some time that any Jew would be more angry at Christians, especially the fundamentalist variety, than any atheist could ever be. This is why.

I do have a question, though - in your belief system, do you hold that the tribes of Israel are the only chosen people of God?

The phrase "the chosen people" is so widely misunderstood, and has brought us so much grief over the years, that we don't much use it any more. It refers only to the fact that we were chosen to bring the Torah to humanity. We did. End of implications. It never implied any special privilege or favor. History seems to have borne that out, too. Many Jews would (and do) say that it means "chosen to take a lot of crap."
Then there is the old Jewish joke: "Why can't God choose somebody else once in a while?"

And does this mean that you can only be a Hebrew through genetics, or can you become Jewish through marriage, or through the conscious decision to follow the Jewish faith? I'm just curious - I know what many other Jews have said on this topic, and I find it fascinating, but I always want to hear more.

Well, since I was born a Methodist and converted to Judaism at the age of 50, I think my views are clear.

All branches of Judaism have always accepted converts, and by Jewish law, they are considered as Jewish as one born so. It is even forbidden to mention that one is a convert unless that person brings it up first, lest we be discriminated against in any way.
Traditionally, the first convert was Jethro, Moses's father-in-law. Anyone who ever told you that Jews must be born Jewish is full of feces.

(Whether your side or the Christians are right, I'm going to hell anyway. :D )

No Jew will tell you that. We believe that if there is a Heaven--Jews are not certain that there is an afterlife at all--that anyone, of any faith or none, is welcome. What one believes is of no consequence. One will be judged on the basis of what one does--and no man can know what that judgment will be, but only God alone. We aren't even allowed to have an opinion about that. Saying that one is "saved," or that anyone else isn't, is simply forbidden.
 
--

cnorman, I want to start by saying that I have really enjoyed your posts on this forum. It's been a delight to see the pro-religious faith side argued by an intelligent rational individual.

Thank you. As I've said many times, this is the most intelligent forum I've ever seen, and with few exceptions, the most civil.

This post was particularly eloquent and I understand it was directed to Christians on a different forum, not those on this board.

However, if the response of "I had nothing to do with that" isn't a reasonable response from a person who wasn't even born when the attrocities you are discussing, what is? What would you like to hear in response to such tales?

This isn't, by the way, a rhetorical question. Similar arguments have been made in regard to slavery and treatment of blacks in the U.S. But I am not responsible for the actions of my ancestors, whether they be slave-owners or nazi's (and as far as I can tell, they were neither). Am I supposed to apologize for being born into a race/nation/religion that had such a history? Do you want an apology for what they did? Am I just supposed to offer sympathy and understanding? What response are you looking for when you relate such tales? Sorrow and horror at such atrocities I can easily offer, but shame or repentance? Why should I apologize for or be ashamed of the actions of others that happened long before I was born?

You mentioned that you were raised Christian. Have you ever apologized to other Jews for what others of the same nominal faith you were raised in did decades or centuries ago?

I'll start with your last question first. When I was a minister, every year on the Sunday nearest Yom HaShoah (Holocaust remembrance day), my congregants would enter the church to find the cross missing from the altar and replaced by a Star of David made of rusted barbed wire that I made myself (yes, it hurt). I would preach on the subject of the Holocaust in the same terms that you see here. Personally, I fasted on Yom HaShoah itself every year for almost thirty years, and only stopped when I became a Jew myself.

In spite of my rhetoric in this article, words mean nothing. Here is what I mean:

As we speak, there is a Catholic convent and an enormous cross at the site of the Auschwitz death camp. They are there to honor and memorialize the Catholics who were killed there. That's fine--but there is no acknowledgment of the Jews who died there in much greater numbers.

"Supersession," the doctrine that Jews are obsolete, condemned to Hell and no longer part of God's plan, is still widely taught in Christian churches. Though many denominations have formally renounced that doctrine in church councils, little or no effort has been made to make laymen of the "rank and file" aware of it.

A Catholic Mass is still said at a church in Germany for Hitler's soul every year.

The Orthodox churches in particular still print and distribute Chrysostom's
Against the Jews
and the infamous Protocols of the Elders of Zion and many other blatantly antisemitic works.

And, of course, on the forum where this was posted, S*****'s vile remarks went without comment while Christians were busy telling me I was going to Hell for being a Jew.

Apologies would be nice, but first these things should STOP, and then be acknowledged for the EVILS that they are and always have been, and for the horrors they have been used to justify.

Incidentally, I also often preached on the subjects of slavery and segregation, the genocidal wars directed at Native Americans, anti-gay bigotry, the subjugation of women, and other matters once endorsed and justified in the name of Jesus.

Christianity as an institution has blood on its hands. It should publicly acknowledge that, clean up its act, and root out all traces of the sources of that blood. Then and only then will it begin to have the moral and ethical credibility, let alone the authority, that it claims.
 
Christianity as an institution has blood on its hands. It should publicly acknowledge that, clean up its act, and root out all traces of the sources of that blood. Then and only then will it begin to have the moral and ethical credibility, let alone the authority, that it claims.

A religion with moral and ethical credibility would be a new and strange creature indeed.
 
The thing I, as an atheist, find odd about the argument you're making, cnorman18, is that it seems to involve a fundamental category-confusion. Surely the question at stake in "should I be a Jew or a Christian (or an atheist)" is "who is right about God" not "which group of people behaved best, historically."

The fact that you say no true Jew would ever become a Christian because of the history of Christian mistreatment of Jews suggests that you don't really believe there's any question of veracity at stake in these issues. It's just a question of which team you want to identify with. I mean, I'm sure you'd agree that it would be insane for someone to say "I won't believe in the scientific validity of DNA because that James Watson is such a racist prick (and follow that up with a long account of the awful costs of racism throughout the centuries)." But obviously it's not insane (although it is debatable) to say "I would never support such-and-such a sports team because look how horribly they have behaved over the years." Are you really wanting to suggest that religious belief is of the same order as choosing which team you root for?

Now, perhaps you agree (with me and others) that the claim that Jesus was the son of God, born of a virgin etc. etc. is absurd, utterly lacking in evidence, and rightly to be disregarded. But then I wonder why you would think that the claim that God spoke to Moses from a burning bush (etc. etc.) is any more worthy of consideration? If the question of "who got this right" is simply off the table then the question of "who tends to have behaved best" becomes relevant, but seems to be dwarfed by the obvious third option: "why bother with any of these absurd beliefs to begin with?"
 
--

Beyond that -- the fact that the acts you despise were committed by Christians does not make them "Christian" acts. This is the "Hitler liked dogs" argument; the fact that someone with some trait has committed a reprehensible act does not mean that other who share the trait share the responsibility.

I'd be willing to bet that most if not all of the concentration camp guards you wrote about liked chocolate chip cookies, too. I like chocolate chip cookies. Does that mean that I should apologize to you on behalf of all chocolate-chip-cookie-likers throughout history?

I am college-educated. So was Edward Teller, the father of the hydrogen bomb. Does this mean that I, and other college graduates world-wide, share responsibility with him for putting millions of people in fear of nuclear annihiliation?

Some of my ancestors were English. Should I apologize to prostitutes for the fact that a fellow Englishman named "Jack the Ripper" carved a dozen or so up in the late 1800s? Or can I simply point out that there are lots of Englishmen and some are nicer than others?

That's an invalid analogy on its face. The Church claims moral authority and the responsibility of giving its members standards of ethical and humane behavior. Chocolate chip cookies do not.

Google "German Christian movement" and see what you find.

It is true that the Nazis did not carry out their Final Solution on explicitly religious grounds, but it remains a fact that the overwhelming majority of its perpetrators were Christians.

Please note also that every other instance of mass murder, pogrom, torture, and the mass expulsions I have not even mentioned, were carried out on explicitly Christian grounds.

I'm sure that most of those people ate bread, but the loaves did not order the Inquisition, the Crusades, the Chelminitzki horrors, and all the rest. Popes, Patriarchs, archbishops, bishops, prelates and priests did.
 

This could certainly be seen as rude. But, perhaps by accident, it could also be constructive criticism.

I can certianly appreciate that every word means something to you, Cnorman. If you just wanted to get it off your chest, then fine. If you were trying to communicate, then the above attitude tells you what you have to overcome.

I would have focused on these parts:

S***** has been spreading the most vicious and evil kind of antisemitic excrement on this very thread. Did YOU respond to it?

Few did. Most just pretended he wasn't there--"nothing to do with ME or MY faith." A few Christians spoke out against him--two? three?-- but who has been most vocal? Myself--and a professed atheist!

Where were the Christians?
We asked that same question from 1933 till 1945. Where were the Christians?

Has anything changed?

[...] "Take the beam out of your own eye before you try to take the speck out of your brother's."

"By their fruits ye shall know them."

What do the "fruits" of Christianity look like, do you suppose, to a Jew?

If you read the foully evil fulminations of S***** and posted nothing, you have no right whatever to complain about this post.

[...] Have you denied Jesus before men with your silence?

What will you do now?

Repent--or attack?

btw,
I appreciate your posts, and read it all, but I wasn't your intended audience.
 
Last edited:
--

cnorman18,

If the Holocaust and numerous others atrocities inflicted on the Jewish people you cited were despicable acts of collective punishment for alleged crimes perpetrated by people who lived long ago, such as the execution of Jesus, and if those acts are morally reprehensible, then is it not equally reprehensible to ask for group repentance from all Christians for something they didn't do themselves?

How is one from of collective punishment wrong in principle but the other right?

Because in the former case, the "alleged crimes" never occurred. The murder of Jesus is a falsehood that goes back to the NT itself; crucifixion was a Roman punishment. Jews carried out executions by stoning, and that punishment was still being used during Jesus's lifetime (he rescued a woman from it). The other crimes, like ritual murder and the crimes alleged in the Protocols, were deliberate, knowing forgeries and lies promulgated with the complicity and cooperation of the religious authorities when those authorities were not, in fact, their source.

I have little doubt that Christian dogmas of the early 20th century exacerbated ethnic and religious conflict, and that the Catholic Church in particular was, at best, willfully ignoring the ongoing problems, but it does not follow that all Christians are responsible for those and other acts.

And I have never said so. I speak of the collective, institutional responsibility of the Church. Only when individual Christians are themselves guilty, as in when preaching to a Jew (me) that God has abrogated the Covenant and rendered Judaism expendable, or when remaining silent in the presence of egregious evil, have I spoken of individual guilt. If that intention is anywhere misstated or unclear, I apologize.
 
After reading your post, it only reinforces my belief that religion causes hatred. You judge people on which religion they practise and not personally as an indivividuals.
 
Hi cnorman18. I've been reading your posts for a minute. I don't know any Jews, and it's been pretty interesting to learn about all things Jewish from you. I haven't ever posted in this board because I usually don't have much to add to the discussion, but it often makes for interesting reading.

Anyway, I can attempt to understand, but probably don't fully, why reading some stuff from an anti-semite can anger a Jew and posting something like that...well I don't blame you. Those people are bad guys, end of story, and being angry with them is normal for me as a non-Jew. I couldn't really begin to understand what a Jew would think.

But I think it's a little over the line and misdirected, especially the bit about I had nothing to do with that being the wrong answer. That's a gross oversimplification, and I'll tell you why:

Me myself, I'm mostly German, a smattering of other white backgrounds, and part American Indian, who came to the US before the Civil War, never owned a slave, and fought for the North. One set of my grandparents were the types of not really into church and all that Catholics that got a divorce and both remarried, while the other set was and still is mad devout Catholics, and all three of my grandfathers fought in WWII. I'm of the "don't really care"-ism religion, but my ma and my grandma and my wife all is, my whole ancestry as far as I can figure is and was some form of Christian. My daughter probably will be too, and that's cool with me. Or maybe she won't. Anyway, my wife is half Mexican, and half Polish, which, incidentally, both of her Grandparents fled Poland around the time the Nazis came around, but they are/were Catholic and both blind, so they'd have gotten it from the Nazis just the same regardless of religion. And that's just what I could figure out, I don't even know about the majority of my family.

See what I mean? If you want to be bringing up things that didn't even happen in my lifetime, where do I even start? I'd have to apologize to myself, who I'm not even mad at, for driving myself off my own land. My daughter's got all kinds of reasons to be mad at herself for being a Polish German who fled from herself into land she stole from herself in both New York and Texas...?

That's a bit ridiculous, no?

I mean, what you're asking here is for me, when the day comes I have to explain this stuff to her, that she should feel bad about the Holocaust and all that other stuff she had nothing to do with. I'm not going to tell her that, and I'm not personally going to feel bad either.

Maybe I missed the point, but that's what I got out of it.
 
--

The thing I, as an atheist, find odd about the argument you're making, cnorman18, is that it seems to involve a fundamental category-confusion. Surely the question at stake in "should I be a Jew or a Christian (or an atheist)" is "who is right about God" not "which group of people behaved best, historically."

The fact that you say no true Jew would ever become a Christian because of the history of Christian mistreatment of Jews suggests that you don't really believe there's any question of veracity at stake in these issues. It's just a question of which team you want to identify with. I mean, I'm sure you'd agree that it would be insane for someone to say "I won't believe in the scientific validity of DNA because that James Watson is such a racist prick (and follow that up with a long account of the awful costs of racism throughout the centuries)." But obviously it's not insane (although it is debatable) to say "I would never support such-and-such a sports team because look how horribly they have behaved over the years." Are you really wanting to suggest that religious belief is of the same order as choosing which team you root for?

Now, perhaps you agree (with me and others) that the claim that Jesus was the son of God, born of a virgin etc. etc. is absurd, utterly lacking in evidence, and rightly to be disregarded. But then I wonder why you would think that the claim that God spoke to Moses from a burning bush (etc. etc.) is any more worthy of consideration? If the question of "who got this right" is simply off the table then the question of "who tends to have behaved best" becomes relevant, but seems to be dwarfed by the obvious third option: "why bother with any of these absurd beliefs to begin with?"

You misunderstand my argument. I never said that "no true Jew would ever become a Christian."

First, there is no such thing as a "true Jew" as opposed to some other kind. One is Jewish, or one is not. There is no "true Scotsman" argument available in Judaism. One may be an apostate Jew, an observant Jew, a criminal Jew, or an even an atheist Jew, but all these are still Jews.

Second, any Jew may certainly become a Christian; but then one forfeits the right to call oneself a Jew.

Lest I be misunderstood; that also applies to Islam, Hinduism, and any other religion that recognizes a god other than the God of Israel. One may be a Buddhist or an atheist Jew, because those have nothing to say about God. Remaining a Jew with no God is one thing; remaining a Jew while worshiping some other god is quite another. The history of Christianity's relations with the Jews makes that religion particularly problematic, but the prohibition is not unique to it.

"why bother with any of these absurd beliefs to begin with?"

Yeah, I sorta figured I'd see that one here.

Very many Jews are indeed atheists, especially since the Holocaust. Not all; not even most. We regard that as an individual and deeply personal decision, and we do not condemn or argue with each other about it--from either side. Atheist Jews are not called traitors, infidels or "faithless" by Jews who believe; believing Jews are not called fools, "illogical," or "superstitious" by those who don't. We leave each other's beliefs to each other and affirm and support each other as Jews.

We have an old, old saying about differences between ourselves: "When the pogroms start, it won't matter."

Because they have always started again. Always.
 
The phrase "the chosen people" is so widely misunderstood, and has brought us so much grief over the years, that we don't much use it any more. It refers only to the fact that we were chosen to bring the Torah to humanity. We did. End of implications. It never implied any special privilege or favor. History seems to have borne that out, too. Many Jews would (and do) say that it means "chosen to take a lot of crap." Then there is the old Jewish joke: "Why can't God choose somebody else once in a while?"
Note: had you been Muslim, not Methodist, and converted to Judaism, you might be ruled apostate and might, in some places, face severe sanction. Of course, in those same places, adhering to Judaism might get you some crap anyway.
All branches of Judaism have always accepted converts, and by Jewish law, they are considered as Jewish as one born so. It is even forbidden to mention that one is a convert unless that person brings it up first, lest we be discriminated against in any way. Traditionally, the first convert was Jethro, Moses's father-in-law. Anyone who ever told you that Jews must be born Jewish is full of feces.
Three words. Sammy. Davis. Junior. :cool:
One will be judged on the basis of what one does--and no man can know what that judgment will be, but only God alone.
So ya gotta walk the walk if ya talk the talk. ;)

DR
 
We have an old, old saying about differences between ourselves: "When the pogroms start, it won't matter."

Because they have always started again. Always.
If you get a tip on when the next ones start, feel free to come to my house.

Got firearms. Got ammo.

That might give a few of those pogromers pause.

DR
 

Back
Top Bottom