• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Princess Diana Revisited

The Atheist

The Grammar Tyrant
The Atheist
Joined
Jul 3, 2006
Messages
36,364
The British inquest into Princess Diana's death is about to become fodder for all CTists with an idiot Kiwi ex-spy, Richard Tomlinson, of all things being responsible for statements like these:

Mr Tomlinson, a highly controversial figure who worked for MI6 and was later sacked by the organisation, claims the Princess' death was curiously similar to a fate planned by MI6 for Serbian leader President Slobodan Milosevic in the early 1990s.

He also claims the Princess and Al Fayed's driver, Henri Paul, who was also killed in the crash, worked for MI6.
Click to expand...

link

Meanwhile, on the other side of the equation, we now have Henri Paul apparently tipping the paparazzi off.

Compared to what Diana CTists believe, merely kidnapping thousands of airline passengers and staging the CD of WTC buildings while suborning thousands of firemen and cops was a piece of cake.

Prince Philip's most dastardly, diabolical murder of Princess Diana is easily the most cunning plan of all. Taking into account Tomlinson's testimony, it now seems that events worked out like this:

Henri Paul tips off paparazzi to make sur ethey chase him. He then gets drunk the point of insensibility. After starting the car, he ensures that Diana and Dodi are seat-belt free then tears off towards a tunnel which he knows the car cannot navigate at the speed he drives. Leaving off his own seat-belt to ensure the cover-up works, Paul crashes the car, killing all occupants barring the security guard. The security guard must live to show that had Diana been wearing a seat-belt, she would have probably survived. Such is the deviousness of Prince Philip's mind. No doubt, there has been a secret payoff to Paul's family for his successful suicide at the behest of the Royal Family.

Fortunately, even when the inquest rules as it must - that the deaths were a horrible accident resulting from a number of factors which alone would probably not have proven fatal - the real truth will still be known to a few lucky ones.

Just stay well clear of Buck House.
 
The seat belt is what really makes me roll my eyes at the CTs here. After all of that, to have the entire plan foiled if Diana had just fastened her seat belt? Some plan.
 
Well, the most outlandish there is Henri Paul as the "suicide killer".

I can understand when you kill yourself for a cause.

But happily heading for suicide in order to eliminate Lady Di, that's a bit far-fetched, no?

"For the Queen!"? Henri Paul isn't even English...
 
One of the "revelations" is that two SIS (MI6) operatives were....in Paris that day.

Seriously, that's it. What do they think SIS are for, for god's sake?

It's a fricking joke is what it is. Meanwhile the contents of the Stockwell 1 file re the shooting of an innocent foreign national by the Metropolitan Police remains closed, and prosecutors are forced to resort to Health and Safety law to bring them to some kind of justice. It doesn't take a conspiracy theorists' mind to realise that this kind of investigation helps to distract attention from such awkward stories. I'm not suggesting the two cases are in any way linked, just that it's fortuitous for the government and the police that they are co-inciding.
 
...claims the Princess' death was curiously similar to a fate planned by MI6 for Serbian leader President Slobodan Milosevic in the early 1990s.
Click to expand...

They were going to have the paparazzi chase Slobo? Who knew he was in such demand by the tabloids?



peguyjaures said:
Well, the most outlandish there is Henri Paul as the "suicide killer".

I can understand when you kill yourself for a cause.

But happily heading for suicide in order to eliminate Lady Di, that's a bit far-fetched, no?

"For the Queen!"? Henri Paul isn't even English...
Click to expand...

Agreed. I don't see how the CTs can keep a straight face when they suggest such nonsense.

Steve S.
 
The odd thing is that people actually believe this - well, assuming you class women as people. I know two women quite well who believe Philip ordered Diana killed and the crash in Paris was murder. Both of these women are seemingly quite sane: good management jobs, only one head & two eyes, able to tie their own shoelaces, yet they believe the CT.

I'm sure a lot of it is simply women who identified with Diana so strongly that they can't let go. Bit like women who used to see Elvis at every petrol station.
 
I don't think Prince Philip is capable of ordering anything much beyond a G & T
 
It's a wonder the Royal family had time to organise this, what with running the world drug trade and all.......
 
assuming you class women as people
Click to expand...

Stupid women - incapable of thinking logically, always believing in silly conspiracy theories. It's not surprising most of the 9/11 Truthers, Holocaust deniers and moon-landing conspiracy believers are female.

Oh, wait...
 
Princess Diana's death was due to a drunk driver, no seat belts, drunk driver fleeing paparazi, and a controlled termite mini-nuke demolition that caused the car to crush into it's own footprint.
 
Lucy82 said:
Stupid women - incapable of thinking logically, always believing in silly conspiracy theories. It's not surprising most of the 9/11 Truthers, Holocaust deniers and moon-landing conspiracy believers are female.
Click to expand...
Truer words were never spoken. Durned wimmins.

Look at Olivette Stone's JFK.

Or Davida Fay Wray Griffin's Debunking the Debunkers.

Or Erika von Daniken's Chariots of the Gawds.

Why do females do it? Why?!?
 
Annoying thing is this sodding "investigation" is costing 10 million pounds. 10 Million squid to point out the bleeding obvious. It's the most annoying thing I've found out this week.

The 2nd most annoying thing is that the civil servant in charge of controlling government spending has spent £27,000 of taxpayer money on meals over four years.
 
8den said:
The 2nd most annoying thing is that the civil servant in charge of controlling government spending has spent £27,000 of taxpayer money on meals over four years.
Click to expand...
Do you want to compare that expense account with a private sector executive of a similar level?
Would you be just as annoyed?
 
brodski said:
Do you want to compare that expense account with a private sector executive of a similar level?
Would you be just as annoyed?
Click to expand...


Straw Man Argument.
A guy in the private sector is not spending the Taxpayer's money.
Now if I were a stockholder in the company I might get upset but still....
 
dudalb said:
Straw Man Argument.
Click to expand...
Where have I misrepresented anyone's position?

A guy in the private sector is not spending the Taxpayer's money.
Click to expand...
And explain why that is different? The expenses are essentially part of his renumeration package, if you want top flight people, you have to pay for them.

Now if I were a stockholder in the company I might get upset but still....
Click to expand...

How about a customer?
 
I don't like how the poll assumes she died in the crash. It is all a big conspiracy that she organised to escape HRH and her lizard brood.
 
8den said:
Annoying thing is this sodding "investigation" is costing 10 million pounds. 10 Million squid to point out the bleeding obvious. It's the most annoying thing I've found out this week.

The 2nd most annoying thing is that the civil servant in charge of controlling government spending has spent £27,000 of taxpayer money on meals over four years.
Click to expand...

He's not in charge of controlling government spending - he's in charge of the auditing of government expenditure. Also after reading this report: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7039089.stm I was amazed at how little he does spend on travelling, meals and so on.
 
Lucy82 said:
Stupid women - incapable of thinking logically, always believing in silly conspiracy theories. It's not surprising most of the 9/11 Truthers, Holocaust deniers and moon-landing conspiracy believers are female.

Oh, wait...
Click to expand...


:D That's what I thought when I read that. Or rather, it was the second thought that came to mind…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom