Does 'rape culture' accurately describe (many) societies?

Citation.

Citation.

Citation.


All from a self-confessed desensitised porn advocate. No experts, no articles, no studies. Nothing.
Yawn. Don't need to. Read about him and his organization. No peer reviewed studies and so called data pulled out of his ass. Very typical of the sources you reference.
 
Yawn. Don't need to...blah blah blah
Still no citations, no experts, no articles and no studies. Zero. Nada

The Lucy Faithfull Foundation:
Around 140 people from various backgrounds and disciplines with a range of knowledge and abilities make up our diverse and skilled workforce, all dedicated to making a difference.

Our UK-wide practitioner team consists of psychologists, former probation officers and police officers, social workers and those with specialist experience working with children and young people. Our Stop It Now helpline is staffed by a team of dedicated advisors with diverse backgrounds, including teaching, working with children with disabilities and counselling. Our administrative teams provide unwavering support to all.


No one is going to take the ramblings of a desensitised porn apologists seriously.
 
Still no citations, no experts, no articles and no studies. Zero. Nada

The Lucy Faithfull Foundation:
Around 140 people from various backgrounds and disciplines with a range of knowledge and abilities make up our diverse and skilled workforce, all dedicated to making a difference.

Our UK-wide practitioner team consists of psychologists, former probation officers and police officers, social workers and those with specialist experience working with children and young people. Our Stop It Now helpline is staffed by a team of dedicated advisors with diverse backgrounds, including teaching, working with children with disabilities and counselling. Our administrative teams provide unwavering support to all.


No one is going to take the ramblings of a desensitised porn apologists seriously.
You believe that because that's how this guy describes his organization. You will believe anything. Probably ten activists working out of thir bedrooms. I mean zealots.
 
Two in a row of unrelated studies and grotesque exaggerations. And yet the legal pornography is readily available in the UK. Wake me when they come for me.
Come back when you decide to actually address what I have asked for (multiple times now).
 
Come back when you decide to actually address what I have asked for (multiple times now).
I don't care what you ask for. That is irrelevant. As is what you think constitutes evidence. I agree, there are creeps on the internet. But you are not providing any link between that and legal porn. And by the way, that creeps also look at porn is not a causal link. Correlation is not causation,
 
I don't care what you ask for. That is irrelevant. As is what you think constitutes evidence. I agree, there are creeps on the internet. But you are not providing any link between that and legal porn. And by the way, that creeps also look at porn is not a causal link. Correlation is not causation,
#4,689
 
Evidence that sexual preference changes with porn consumption?
........
You may have not found the right pornography for you. People, not women, not men, like what they like. I think it's also important to understand that our tastes change. What did it for you before is boring today. And things you couldn't imagine being interested in when you're younger now are delicious.
Correlation is not causation,
Presumably, it is perfectly fine to describe porn that intends to portray the underage as 'delicious'?
#4,689
 
Last edited:
It's less morally bankrupt than every church.
Not the subject of the thread. You remain in need of a Christian debater.
Don't say it's not out there. And if you Google the search terms, Pornhub, barely legal, and the UK, you will find hundreds of videos. Not hard to find if you look for it.
Where have I ever suggested otherwise? All my posts on the subject have confirmed it's existence.

It is very sad to see someone so blind to the damage they are causing by feeding the creation of this material. That the UK has criminalised it should give cause for some scruple but you are doubling down.
 
Not the subject of the thread. You remain in need of a Christian debater.

Where have I ever suggested otherwise? All my posts on the subject have confirmed it's existence.

It is very sad to see someone so blind to the damage they are causing by feeding the creation of this material. That the UK has criminalised it should give cause for some scruple but you are doubling down.
Me and billions of others. What I think is sad is the dishonesty of your posts. Non stop, you post things that are not true.

You still have failed to present any evidence of damage. On the other hand, I can show how religion has broken up families and led to the murder and torture of hundreds of millions of people. So when you say that you find images of people enjoying each other as sick and disgusting I laugh and feel sorry for you. As you have been missing out on the natural joy of humanity.
 
Indeed.

Based on expert evidence - of which you have cited precisely ZERO. Go back and look at all the failed requests for such.
No, you have posted the opinions of zealots. They are not experts.
The UK outlawed barely legal type porn because some nutcase said it might be bad?
They didn't.

Off topic again.
It's very much on target. We are talking about activities that damage. I am merely pointing out that you don't actually care about protecting anyone. Because if you did, you would be interested in what really damages people.
Is wanking to what looks like a child in porn a natural joy of humanity? Is it delicious? Your apologia promotes reckless entitlement.
They don't look like children and if you looked at any you would know.
 
No, you have posted the opinions of zealots. They are not experts.
Not demonstrated and you failed previously to uphold that Sheath was religious.
They didn't.
You appear to have forgotten the laws the Darat posted. Now cite an expert that disagrees. Not an expert that points out the loophole - someone who affirms that the UK does not ban this type of content.
It's very much on target. We are talking about activities that damage.
Nope. Stop.
I am merely pointing out that you don't actually care about protecting anyone. Because if you did, you would be interested in what really damages people.
Post your obsession with religion elsewhere.
They don't look like children and if you looked at any you would know.
Gabby Bertin watches porn...and they look like children.

You didn't answer the question - those videos of virtual children - are they delicious?
 
They're zealots. Calling them experts is absurd.
Start engaging with requests for citations that back up your assertions. You said Sheath was religious - citation?

I'll post this YET AGAIN - The Guardian (28th June 2025)
Officials at the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) guided her through short clips of extreme material to help her understand the nature of easily available harmful content. She remains disturbed by the material she saw – content designed to appear to be child sexual abuse, set in children’s bedrooms – roles played by young girls, who may be over 18 but are acting as children. “The titles are very problematic, things like: ‘Daddy’s going to come home and give his daughter a good seeing to’ or ‘Oops I’ve gone too far and now she’s dead’ or ‘Kidnap and kill a hooker.’” This content would be prohibited by the BBFC in the offline world, but is unregulated online.

Now comment on that last sentence which is UNAMBIGUOUS.
 
Last edited:
Start engaging with requests for citations that back up your assertions. You said Sheath was religious - citation?

I'll post this YET AGAIN - The Guardian (28th June 2025)
Officials at the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) guided her through short clips of extreme material to help her understand the nature of easily available harmful content. She remains disturbed by the material she saw – content designed to appear to be child sexual abuse, set in children’s bedrooms – roles played by young girls, who may be over 18 but are acting as children. “The titles are very problematic, things like: ‘Daddy’s going to come home and give his daughter a good seeing to’ or ‘Oops I’ve gone too far and now she’s dead’ or ‘Kidnap and kill a hooker.’” This content would be prohibited by the BBFC in the offline world, but is unregulated online.

Now comment on that last sentence which is UNAMBIGUOUS.
I have no idea what she looked at. But I'm sure they looked like young adults. And Bonnie Blue doesn't look underage. Let alone a child.
 

Back
Top Bottom