• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: The behaviour of US police officers - part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Before I started having an interest in USA policing I would have been at a total loss to understand how this could have happened but now it can seem almost inevitable given how the police are trained and the attitude they have that this type of cold blooded murder happens.
 
Washington State Police Officer suspended for one shift after making Tiktok video while in uniform, sitting in patrol car, telling people that she's allowed to drive any speed she wants and if you don't get out of her way she's "find a reason" to pull you over.

"If we’re driving on the freeway in our police car, get the (censored) out of the way,” Office Breanna Straus says in the video “I can go 90 miles an hour, you can’t. You can’t do that. So get the (censored) out of the way. If us officers stay behind you long enough, we can find a reason to pull you over.”

https://www.seattleweekly.com/news/federal-way-officer-receives-suspension-for-over-tiktok-video/
 
Washington State Police Officer suspended for one shift after making Tiktok video while in uniform, sitting in patrol car, telling people that she's allowed to drive any speed she wants and if you don't get out of her way she's "find a reason" to pull you over.

"If we’re driving on the freeway in our police car, get the (censored) out of the way,” Office Breanna Straus says in the video “I can go 90 miles an hour, you can’t. You can’t do that. So get the (censored) out of the way. If us officers stay behind you long enough, we can find a reason to pull you over.”

https://www.seattleweekly.com/news/federal-way-officer-receives-suspension-for-over-tiktok-video/
What a dope. I mean, cops speed plenty, and it's expected, and of course if they're actually running siren and lights, drivers are obligated to pull over, so how stupid do you have to be to make a video about how you abuse your position, and actually essentially publicize the fact that you'll make false arrests?
 
Think back to that old episode of South Park where Cartman does his "respect my authoritah!" bit.

It's supposed to be funny because it's over the top and extreme, but it's like the police embraced that identity.

I said it upthread, but a few weeks ago I watched Robocop with my son, and I observed that that seems to be a rose-tinted portrait of US policing rather than a biting satire.

The cops were putting their lives on the line in order to protect the public. The corporation was corrupt, but that's a different matter.
 
What a dope. I mean, cops speed plenty, and it's expected, and of course if they're actually running siren and lights, drivers are obligated to pull over, so how stupid do you have to be to make a video about how you abuse your position, and actually essentially publicize the fact that you'll make false arrests?

I mean she got suspended for one shift. She basically got an afternoon off. Nothing actually happened to her. I can't imagine she's "learned a lesson" or anything remotely like that in this case.
 
I mean she got suspended for one shift. She basically got an afternoon off. Nothing actually happened to her. I can't imagine she's "learned a lesson" or anything remotely like that in this case.
Well, cops is cops. On the other hand, if I were a motorist and I got a ticket from this person I'd make sure I had that video in my defense.
 
Clear Creek County deputies shoot and kill man who asked for help after car crash

The man seemed to be having a bit of a mental health crisis - his car was stuck in a ditch or a bush or something and he was convinced that it was a trap. He would not get out of his car. He seemed to just want help with getting his car unstuck. He was an amateur geologist with the tools of the trade in the car with him - a little hammer, a rubber mallet and a pair of little knives.




The entirety of his offense seemed to just be his refusal to get out of the car, along with actually following the order to not throw the knives and hammer out the window.

:(:(:(

Here's a bodycam video. Video cuts out just before shots are fired, audio goes on for a few more seconds.



For a fair bit of the time the poor fellow is just staring at the cops - not a hostile stare, but more of a befuddled look. Other times he just stares off into the middle distance. There is discussion between him and a female cop of him unlocking the door, he seems to think he is unable to do that. She seems to be trying to work with him to get the car unstuck.

A particularly aggressive cop insists on standing on the hood with his gun drawn, as if poor Glass is going to stab someone through the windshield or closed door.

So they break the passenger side window. Everything was pretty calm until then - other than the hyper-escalatory idiot standing on the hood. But once they pop that window Glass freaks out in a big way, clutching the knife and screaming. He appears to be in a complete panic and incoherent. Just looking straight forward, knife in hand next to his face with the blade not pointed at himself nor anyone else and just screaming in panic.

So they use the bean bag gun and then tase him and then shoot him.

It is clear to me that he was utterly and completely unable to follow instructions and that the police utterly and unnecessarily escalated the hell out of the situation.
 
Police excuses used to justify rapid escalation up to lethal force have always been largely baloney, but there used to be some sort of grotesque logic to them at least. You know, that "gotcha" rules-lawyering ticking-the-boxes-in-bad-faith-but-still logic.

But it's starting to not even make THAT little bit of sense anymore. Beanbag shotguns are a riot control weapon, you shoot them at violent mobs who are advancing toward the police, in order to drive them away. What is the point, at all, even theoretically, of breaking a car window and shooting a beanbag point-blank at a person who is sitting, contained, in a seat inside a vehicle? Someone please explain to me what the intended consequence of that action is.
 
The police response to the man stuck in the car seems like a grownup version of "if you don't stop crying I'll give you something to cry about." Basically, he's afraid the cops will shoot him, so to prove him wrong they smash into the car and shoot him.
 
https://www.themarshallproject.org/...year-but-that-s-where-the-accountability-ends

Highlight and bold by me
...snip...
In the spring of 2016, the city of Cleveland agreed to pay $6 million to the family of Tamir Rice, the 12-year-old boy who was shot and killed by a city police officer in late 2014. ...... After the payout was announced, the Rice family said they hoped the settlement would “stimulate a movement for genuine change in our society and our nation’s policing.”.

But five years later, Cleveland has paid more money in police misconduct settlements than in the five years before Rice was killed. In 2017, according to public records obtained by FiveThirtyEight and The Marshall Project, the city paid $7.9 million (including $3 million for half of the payment to the Rice family). In 2019, it paid $6 million. That’s more than the city spent on police misconduct in the entire five-year period between 2010 and 2014. ...snip....

But police settlements are their own bramble of contradictions. Including Cleveland, we obtained public records from 31 of the 50 cities with the highest police-to-civilian ratios in the country. Our analysis shows the cities have spent more than $3 billion to settle misconduct lawsuits over the past 10 years. 3 (You can access all of the data in our Observable notebook.)But as with Cleveland, the data mostly left us with more questions than answers. Shoddy, confusing, or incomplete record-keeping combined with a host of other local factors to make it nearly impossible for us to conclude if anything was changing in any given city—much less whether those shifts were for better or worse. Those problems, in turn, mean that it’s very difficult to know which cities are more successfully reducing police misconduct than others, and how the burden on taxpayers is shifting as a result. ...snip...

Really interesting article/report - plenty of data citations.
 
Guilty of sitting in your own truck while black:

Black Man in Oakland Handcuffed After Being Accused of Stealing His Own Truck

A Black man in Oakland was wrongfully accused on Tuesday of stealing a truck that belonged to him. Nicole Hirsch, the wife of the victim, says that he was seated in his truck at 11:30 am at 35th and MLK when he was approached by a couple.

“He described it like they were looking in his truck bed and he rolled down his window and said to them ‘Can I help you with something?’ and they said to him something to the effect of ‘Our truck was stolen,’” Hirsch told local ABC 7 reporters.

Nicole’s husband, who works as a landscaper, had his tools in the bed of the truck, easily visible to the couple who stood firm in their stance despite the obvious. The victim even went as far as to show the couple a picture taken of himself and the same truck four years ago, and yet, they remained unconvinced. Minutes later, the Oakland police surrounded the area, and the man ended up in handcuffs.

“He put his hands up is my understanding and followed their orders,” Hirsch said. “He told me that it’s embarrassing to be in handcuffs on the street with many cop cars around. It’s humiliating. It’s infuriating.”

Hirsch told ABC 7 that her husband spent a great deal of time explaining that the truck in question was actually his.

“They put him in handcuffs before he was even asked for his license or registration,” she said. She further expressed that she believes beyond the shadow of a doubt that he was treated this way because he’s Black.

“I definitely do,” she said. “Just like this couple that is claiming this is our truck. He is also a person and why is his voice and his opinion not given the same weight and credence that the couple was given.”

In a statement made by the OPD, the stolen vehicle was later reported as found.

Thank goodness he didn't make any moves that could have gotten him shot dead by trigger-happy pigs.
 
Guilty of sitting in your own truck while black:

Black Man in Oakland Handcuffed After Being Accused of Stealing His Own Truck



Thank goodness he didn't make any moves that could have gotten him shot dead by trigger-happy pigs.

It ought, I think, to be obvious here that the police were doing their job wrong. Every vehicle these days has a VIN visible through the windshield, and any cop can look it up via radio. If there's a similar truck stolen (quite possibly given how many are out there) it should be a simple matter of asking the driver for the registration and cross checking it.

Although not quite such a black and white matter, the couple whose truck was stole ought also to have had the VIN handy, and have been able to look and see that it was not theirs.

At the very least it's poor procedure, and that's being unnecessarily generous.
 
It ought, I think, to be obvious here that the police were doing their job wrong. Every vehicle these days has a VIN visible through the windshield, and any cop can look it up via radio. If there's a similar truck stolen (quite possibly given how many are out there) it should be a simple matter of asking the driver for the registration and cross checking it.

Although not quite such a black and white matter, the couple whose truck was stole ought also to have had the VIN handy, and have been able to look and see that it was not theirs.

At the very least it's poor procedure, and that's being unnecessarily generous.

Also, all vehicles have license plates with numbers on them. If you search the license plate number, it will tell you the make and model of the vehicle and the owner and the VIN.

Oh sure, they can go with the "True, the license plates don't match those of the stolen vehicle, but they could have just switched the license plates out," but then you'd have to say, "by taking the license plates off another black Ford F150." Until you get to the VIN, and find out that the license plate matches the VIN, and then there is nothing left.

How racist do you have to be to presume that the person in the car switched the license plates on the stolen vehicle with another set of license plates for the same make and model vehicle? Presumed guilty....
 
Also, all vehicles have license plates with numbers on them. If you search the license plate number, it will tell you the make and model of the vehicle and the owner and the VIN.

Oh sure, they can go with the "True, the license plates don't match those of the stolen vehicle, but they could have just switched the license plates out," but then you'd have to say, "by taking the license plates off another black Ford F150." Until you get to the VIN, and find out that the license plate matches the VIN, and then there is nothing left.

How racist do you have to be to presume that the person in the car switched the license plates on the stolen vehicle with another set of license plates for the same make and model vehicle? Presumed guilty....

That is of course also true, but it's still routine and unquestionably more foolproof than license plate checking to look at the VIN, which is why, for ***** sake, it is required to be visible through the ******* windshield!
 
This one is just plain dumbassery.

Woman seriously hurt after Platteville police car she was placed in is hit by train

A 20-year-old road rage suspect was seriously injured when the parked police patrol vehicle she was detained in was struck by a freight train in northern Colorado.

The Colorado Bureau of Investigation says multiple law enforcement agencies responded to a report of a road rage incident involving a firearm in Fort Lupton on Friday evening. A Platteville police officer stopped the woman’s car just past a set of railroad tracks and parked the patrol vehicle on the crossing.

The Greeley woman was placed in the back of the police vehicle, which was hit by the train as officers were searching her car. The suspect name and details of her injuries have not been released.

The Fort Lupton Police Department is investigating the road rage report, while the Colorado State Patrol is investigating the crash. The Colorado Bureau of Investigation is looking into the woman’s injury while she was in police custody.
 
I just recently noticed a rail crossing with a sign warning people not to stop on the tracks. Next up, "Restaurant puts up sign telling customers not to put beans up their nose."

People are exceptionally dumb when it comes to level crossings. My old commute to work had a level crossing for a commuter rail line (so trains coming about every 20 minutes each direction). There's a stop light not far beyond the crossing. It's a very busy road so when that light is red, cars back up to the crossing.

There's been a lot of times where I approached the crossing and it was clear that there wasn't enough room for my car to clear the tracks and I stopped short of the tracks. Ya know, in case a train comes. The amount of times that's been met with honking from the car behind me is disturbing. And it's not like they can't see what's in front of me. The amount of times I've seen cars just stop on the tracks when there wasn't enough room to clear them is also disturbing. I'm honestly shocked there's not a monthly collision with the train.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom