Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
I did not agree. I said I understood what you were trying to say, not that your incorrect statement didn't matter.To the point I was making it makes no difference, as you agreed...
I did not agree. I said I understood what you were trying to say, not that your incorrect statement didn't matter.To the point I was making it makes no difference, as you agreed...
I did not agree. I said I understood what you were trying to say, not that your incorrect statement didn't matter.
Here's a guy doing magic tricks for three different chimps using an Ipad, but the Chimps don't seem to get that anything at all that's happening is so bizzarre.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2016/feb/15/chimps-amazed-ipad-magic-tricks-video
I don't think, orangutans can understand the way we do, so tricks might mean nothing to them.
I don't think, orangutans can understand the way we do, so tricks might mean nothing to them.
this here is a far better illusion and absent is any sign of hilarity.
That's because it's only an illusion from the camera's point of view, not the orangutan's.
I don't get it. I mean, as a human.
The magician holds the card up to the glass and it "travels" through to the other side. Is that the "magic" trick? Okay, I have no way to know how that's done, and it matters. Did the trick appear the same to the orangutan? Did something need done off camera that the orang could see but I couldn't? I have no idea. So I can't judge what the orang's reaction should be because I have no idea what he saw.
In the other magic tricks, I can guess that the orang saw pretty much the same thing I did, so it doesn't matter how it was done. I can guess what an animal/person's typical reaction would be.
Definitely not.
Not sure what the rules are anymore. Under these circumstances, can someone describe how a magic trick is done? Otherwise, there's no way to move forward with the discussion about the orangutan's behavior, because there's no way to know what he/she saw.
That's because it's only an illusion from the camera's point of view, not the orangutan's.
So in saying that are you arguing that the first video shows the orangutan laughing because the poorly done illusion was funny or because it fell for the trick?